• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Tech Helping Design Prototype Fusion Power Plant

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,486 (2.47/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
What's New: As part of a collaboration with Intel and Dell Technologies, the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) and the Cambridge Open Zettascale Lab plan to build a "digital twin" of the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) prototype fusion power plant. The UKAEA will utilize the lab's supercomputer based on Intel technologies, including 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, distributed asynchronous object storage (DAOS) and oneAPI tools to streamline the development and delivery of fusion energy to the grid in the 2040s.

"Planning for the commercialization of fusion power requires organizations like UKAEA to utilize extreme amounts of computational resources and artificial intelligence for simulations. These HPC workloads may be performed using a variety of different architectures, which is why open software solutions that optimize performance needs can lend portability to code that isn't available in closed, proprietary systems. Overall, advanced hardware and software can make the journey to commercial fusion power lower risk and accelerated - a key benefit on the path to sustainable energy."—Adam Roe, Intel EMEA HPC technical director



Why It Matters: Fusion energy, with its potential to provide near limitless and highly sustainable energy, is often heralded as the ultimate alternative power source, but a functioning fusion power plant that can deliver energy to the grid is still years away. Engineering a new breed of power plant requires a lot of advanced tools and massive amounts of modeling and simulations, all while fusion research and technology continue to advance.

As they work toward the functioning fusion facility, UKAEA and the Cambridge Open Zettascale Lab will use supercomputing and a "digital twin," or prototype, of the STEP machine design to accelerate engineering and help future-proof progress, even as things evolve.

"I firmly believe the future of sustainable energy will rely upon supercomputing," said Rob Akers, director of Computing Programmes, UKAEA. "The world has an urgent need to provide energy security and combat climate change. This is a journey we must embark upon together, delivering access and capability to all those who will be instrumental in delivering commercial fusion energy."

How It Works: Working inside the industrial metaverse - a digital representation of an industrial environment that people can interact with - the UKAEA team can adapt their design as new information becomes available and technologies are developed. The supercomputer at the Cambridge Open Zettascale Lab leverages Dell PowerEdge servers based on 4th Gen Xeon processors to run the massive amounts of modeling and simulations needed for fusion research.

oneAPI, which allows developers to use a single codebase to deploy applications across multiple architectures, addresses one of the biggest inhibitors of simulation functionality and performance: code portability. Intel oneAPI tools and optimized AI frameworks deliver performance for deep learning and molecular dynamics. As a oneAPI Center of Excellence, the Cambridge Open Zettascale Lab is focused on broadening this application set to include engineering, fusion materials and plasma simulation.

Storage speed is another potential roadblock in fusion research, which involves large simulations running across thousands of graphics processing unit nodes and then transferring a huge amount of data for fast post-simulation analysis. A single plasma turbulence simulation can output hundreds of petabytes of data in a very short window. Intel DAOS is an open source, software-defined, scale-out object store that provides high bandwidth, low latency and high I/O operations per second (IOPS) storage containers for high performance computing (HPC) applications. For fusion research, it offers a fast and frictionless pathway for analysis and calculations that need to happen in an incredibly small window of time.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Well at least Intel does have the chiller experience ;)

Jokes aside, this needs to be pushed.
 
Around 2077, that fusion reactor will finally generate more power than Xeons that simulate it consume.
 
Tokamaks are dead end technology IMO. The future is in stellarators. Tokamaks have sucked down gargantuan amounts of money and still have little to show after 40 years and even if they build a viable commercial Tokamak it will be gigantic and obscenely priced. No one will get a return on their money unless energy prices are sky-high and good luck with keeping the thing running. Expect another 20 years before we see Tokamaks being built commercially. Stellarators have far fewer technical issues and inherently more stable, are much much smaller and they could actually be in production by 2030 at least in the 100MW range, perfect for small towns.
 
Tokamaks are dead end technology IMO. The future is in stellarators. Tokamaks have sucked down gargantuan amounts of money and still have little to show after 40 years and even if they build a viable commercial Tokamak it will be gigantic and obscenely priced. No one will get a return on their money unless energy prices are sky-high and good luck with keeping the thing running. Expect another 20 years before we see Tokamaks being built commercially. Stellarators have far fewer technical issues and inherently more stable, are much much smaller and they could actually be in production by 2030 at least in the 100MW range, perfect for small towns.

Funny... The pics of prototype Stellarators look closer to what I imagine a 'Fusion Core' would look like, than the Tokamak-inspired fictional descriptions.

(quasi-)Related content (if you'd like a laugh):

-General Motors-
PS: Please stop asking us about self-sustaining fusion reactors already.
 
Tokamaks are dead end technology IMO. The future is in stellarators. Tokamaks have sucked down gargantuan amounts of money and still have little to show after 40 years and even if they build a viable commercial Tokamak it will be gigantic and obscenely priced. No one will get a return on their money unless energy prices are sky-high and good luck with keeping the thing running. Expect another 20 years before we see Tokamaks being built commercially. Stellarators have far fewer technical issues and inherently more stable, are much much smaller and they could actually be in production by 2030 at least in the 100MW range, perfect for small towns.

I, too, am nuclear physicist.
Gargantuan amounts of money is highly debatable. Even the speculated final budget is ridiculously small for something this important (and realistically - not that big at all, especially considering this is multicountry project), and the "big money" started coming in only relatively recently.
 
Around 2077, that fusion reactor will finally generate more power than Xeons that simulate it consume.
Meh, we'll have time travel faster/earlier than we get portable/workable fusion reactors!
 
Meh, we'll have time travel faster/earlier than we get portable/workable fusion reactors!
If you're a fan of "Internet History"
John Titor already brought us the tech from an alternate timeline. :p
 
I, too, am nuclear physicist.
Gargantuan amounts of money is highly debatable. Even the speculated final budget is ridiculously small for something this important (and realistically - not that big at all, especially considering this is multicountry project), and the "big money" started coming in only relatively recently.
I'd describe both of you as nuclear accountants.
 
Back
Top