• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel will change its approach to PC chip upgrades

Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,584 (2.63/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Intel believes PC users won't care about the manufacturing process, just the performance of the chips
kby_lake_s_persp_front_low_05_whitebkg-100701371-large.jpg


"Intel is changing its view on how it upgrades chips.

Rather than tying chip upgrades directly to the manufacturing process involved, Intel will look at delivering a sustained set of performance upgrades with each new chip architecture.

"We're going to be focused more on the generation by the amount of performance increment it will give us," said Venkata Renduchintala, president of Intel's client and internet of things businesses and its systems architecture Group. "I don't think generations will be tagged to node transitions."

The performance benefits will matter more, and the process technology that lives underneath is going to be less conspicuous, Renduchintala said.

Intel pursues Moore's law with plan to make 7nm chips this year ]
In the meanwhile, Intel will speed up its modem development so it can transition to 5G quickly. Intel is looking to grow in the communications market, while giving a lower priority to PCs, a market that has flattened. The company was showing off its new modems at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this week.

Intel used to deliver two generations of PC chips with each manufacturing process node, but that changed with its recent 14-nanometer process.

Intel has made three generations of chips including Broadwell, Skylake, and Kaby Lake, on the 14-nanometer process. The company recently revealed that the 8th Generation Core processors will also be made on the 14-nm node. The announcement came as a surprise because Intel's next-generation 10-nm process is ready.

Intel has made more generations of chips using the 14-nm process as it has been able to squeeze more performance through incremental design upgrades and tweaks to its existing manufacturing process.

But Intel will also deliver PC chips code-named Cannonlake -- its first on the 10-nm process -- later this year. A big question was whether the 8th Generation Core processors would also include Cannonlake chips.

Not for now, but that could change. The company hasn't yet decided how it'll brand or market the Cannonlake chips due later this year.

"If Cannonlake comes out at the end of the year, it'll be interesting what we actually market it as. We haven't decided it yet," Renduchintala said.

Intel has said its 8th Generation Core processors made on the 14-nm process will deliver a performance update of more than 15 percent compared to the current Kaby Lake chips.

The parallel shipments of 10-nm and 14-nm chips could create a branding dilemma, and Intel may have to launch 9th Generation Core chips alongside the 8th Generation chips.

With Intel's new approach to chip design, it's hard to predict how many generations of chips will be made on the 10-nm process. A rough estimate is three to four chip architectures before Intel moves to the 7-nm process.

Right now, PC chips are the first to get upgraded based on new architectures, but that will change in the coming years, with server processors getting the first shot at upgrades.

Intel is moving to a model where users can expect "a yearly cadence of platform upgrade that actually gives meaningful performance improvements from the generation that preceded it," Renduchintala said.
"

http://www.computerworld.com/articl...-change-its-approach-to-pc-chip-upgrades.html
 
I adore Intel:peace:

Ops, I believe someone out there will try to copy Intel's 10-nm/7-nm CPUs:twitch:
 
Last edited:
They just realized that NOW ? Where were they living, under a rock? All we care is performance. Why do you think I have a 22nm 5820K Hexa core instead of a 14nm 6700K Quad core even though 6700K was released at that point? My 5820K packs WAY more punch at same price.
 
Interesting timing of the article.
 
I don't think they have much of a choice to change after this, too bad it took this long.
 
They just realized that NOW ? Where were they living, under a rock? All we care is performance. Why do you think I have a 22nm 5820K Hexa core instead of a 14nm 6700K Quad core even though 6700K was released at that point? My 5820K packs WAY more punch at same price.
if you use more than 8t, indeed. Otherwise there arent any differences. Also, 5820k was more expensive than 6700k upon release. It's also currently 420 at newegg while 6700k is 310.. was 330...
 
It does annoy me that all they did was shrink the process year on year without really doing much else. It's about time they packed some more transistors in!
 
if you use more than 8t, indeed. Otherwise there arent any differences. Also, 5820k was more expensive than 6700k upon release. It's also currently 420 at newegg while 6700k is 310.. was 330...
If he didnt need all those threads he wouldn't have bought a 5820.
"Simple geometry" - Hanzo.
 
Process used to be important because it went hand in hand with performance and thermal management.

Too be honest if the performance keep[s increasing and the thermals are under control they can go back to 130nm for all I care.
 
if you use more than 8t, indeed. Otherwise there arent any differences. Also, 5820k was more expensive than 6700k upon release. It's also currently 420 at newegg while 6700k is 310.. was 330...

When I was buying it, both were around 400€.
 
All what matters is performance, reliability, durability and, of course, price.

I don't give a single f*ck whether my chip is 22 nm, 14 nm or 7 nm, as long as it can offers good performance for the reasonable price tag. I also don't give a single f*ck if my chip has TDP of 90W or 140W.
 

Rather than tying chip upgrades directly to the manufacturing process involved, Intel will look at delivering a sustained set of performance upgrades with each new chip architecture.


no shit?
 
Back
Top