its 1650 super worth a cash still?

[potato580+]

might sounds weird but i dont have any cards anymore, recently sold all rest of my collection to my cousin and my 2200g alr gone too, pretty much my pc is a junk now, becouse dont have a display, so i need a temporary gpu and i looking for a cheap worthy card for long term use, probably get a 1650 4gb(not super) or rx 5500xt, just wonder those card worth a $160, or should i go with a used 980ti anniversary asus for $200+, what would you rather guys, let me know thx

 

[londiste]

1650 Super is the bang-per-buck leader in that segment.

Edit:
5500XT is about the same performance but costs more.
980Ti is a little faster but also older, bigger, hungrier and probably not worth it for $200.

 

[potato580+]

1650 Super is the bang-per-buck leader in that segment.

yes i figure it, but sadly the price of our country kinda mess, market over quality, so you need to pay extra $50 for the super which i think isnt worth abuck anymore

 

[dgianstefani]

1650 super is amazing value for money, it's 5% faster than the 1060 6GB, which is basically the benchmark card for good 1080p, 60fps gaming.

You can also find variants of it that use less than 75W at peak load, which means you don't even need a PCIe connector.

 

[oxrufiioxo]

5500XT is substantially better than a vanilla 1650... around 20-30% faster.

 

[P4-630]

i dont have any cards anymore, recently sold all rest of my collection to my cousin and my 2200g alr gone too

Just buy one good fast card, maybe wait for new cards coming from AMD and Nvidia this year.

 

[dgianstefani]

5500XT is substantially better than a vanilla 1650... around 20-30% faster.

Haha you sure?

For $30 more too lmao.

And that's not even testing against an aftermarket 1650 super, all of which have higher clock rates than the founders edition.

1650 super is almost as fast as a RX590, while using a 2/5ths of the power.

 

[zenlaserman]

Haha you sure?

No, are YOU sure? He said 20-30% faster than _vanilla_ 1650, which, according to the picture you posted, is the slowest card on the list @ 51.4 fps. 5500XT on same list is actually over 30% faster than that.

 

[dgianstefani]

OP is asking about 1650 super, so if this guy decides to talk about vanilla 1650 that's his problem.

 

[MrGRiMv25]

Out of the choices OP listed I'd probably get the 5500XT, if he could up the 1650 from standard version to 1650 Super then the Super would be my choice.

 

[potato580+]

actually i prefer looking for cheaper one hehe, but i might consider pay extra for super yes, it think aero itx would be great, question is do it affect performance? i meant what about the other model that have 6 pin power vs a non power thx

 

[MrGRiMv25]

It's a healthy jump in performance for the extra cash, I've never really worried about the extra 6 pin connector on any card so I'm a bit of a bad reference for that. The 5500xt requires quite a bit more power than both cards, the 1650 Super (on average) consumes ~30w less and the standard 1650 is about 40-50w less than the XT.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Out of the choices OP listed I'd probably get the 5500XT, if he could up the 1650 from standard version to 1650 Super then the Super would be my choice.

remember the 4gb 5500xt struggles on pci-e 3.0 incredibly

frametimes are god awful too

Imo he should get the 1660 super,neither the 5500xt nor 1650 super.Or 5600xt/2060.Just get ONE GOOD GPU instead of a thousand low end ones.

If I were to choose three 3600+gtx 1660 super rigs or one 3900x+2080 super,I'd go with one.

 

[dgianstefani]

remember the 4gb 5500xt struggles on pci-e 3.0 incredibly

frametimes are god awful too

Imo he should get the 1660 super,neither the 5500xt nor 1650 super.Or 5600xt/2060.Just get ONE GOOD GPU instead of a thousand low end ones.

If I were to choose three 3600+gtx 1660 super rigs or one 3900x+2080 super,I'd go with one.

You don't seem to understand the concept of a budget.

3 low end rigs vs 1 high end one is irrelevant. The OP is asking about a specific card.

 

[cucker tarlson]

You don't seem to understand the concept of a budget.

3 low end rigs vs 1 high end one is irrelevant. The OP is asking about a specific card.

well,you don't seem to understand the concept of reading the OP.
if 980Ti is within the limits of his budget,1660 super is too.
the title is "worth it" and 1660 super is more worth its price than 1650 super and 5500xt are worth theirs.

 

[MrGRiMv25]

remember the 4gb 5500xt struggles on pci-e 3.0 incredibly

Imo he should get the 1660 super,neither the 5500xt nor 1650 super.Or 5600xt/2060.Just get ONE GOOD GPU instead of a thousand low end ones.

If I were to choose three 3600+gtx 1660 super rigs or one 3900x+2080 super,I'd go with one.

Totally forgot about that, it's a shame AMD crippled it in that way - it would have made much more sense for them to enable 16x in PCIE3 and 8x in PCIE 4 somehow.

EDIT: Looked at the graph again and it seems the XT is having a heart attack instead of rendering frames.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Totally forgot about that, it's a shame AMD crippled it in that way - it would have made much more sense for them to enable 16x in PCIE3 and 8x in PCIE 4 somehow.

or just pci-e 3.0 16x
makes no sense but thats amd for you.

 

[MrGRiMv25]

Yep, as much as they've done good in the CPU sector they've made a few stumbles GPU wise - I suppose working on CPU/GPU's at once is a bit hard considering their size but that oversight with the bus rate is pretty bad.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Yep, as much as they've done good in the CPU sector they've made a few stumbles GPU wise - I suppose working on CPU/GPU's at once is a bit hard considering their size but that oversight with the bus rate is pretty bad.

I think they're unrelated.
success in cpu design does not translate to gpus.well,they have the design actually,they're just incompetent.

 

[MrGRiMv25]

I think they're unrelated.
success in cpu design does not translate to gpus.well,they have the design actually,they're just incompetent.

Haha, could well be.

 

[cucker tarlson]

Haha, could well be.

full article

PCI-E 3.0 vs. PCI-E 4.0: Was bringt PCI-Express 4.0 mit einer RX 5500 XT wirklich?

Welche Vorteile bietet PCI-Express 4.0 wirklich? PCGH hat eine RX 5500 XT getestet und die Ergebnisse sind beeindruckend!

www.pcgameshardware.de

look at far cry results
4.0 is 1.78x faster

 

[Outback Bronze]

Nothing wrong with a used 1070 either..

 

[cucker tarlson]

Nothing wrong with a used 1070 either..

True
Its like 1660 super with 8gb

 

[oxrufiioxo]

actually i prefer looking for cheaper one hehe, but i might consider pay extra for super yes, it think aero itx would be great, question is do it affect performance? i meant what about the other model that have 6 pin power vs a non power thx

The 1650 super aero itx has a 6 pin power connector..... Do not buy a vanlla 1650 without external power it makes an already terrible card even more terrible.... maybe if it was like $80-100 it would be worth considering but even at that price you should be able to find a substantially better 570 for only slightly more.

OP is asking about 1650 super, so if this guy decides to talk about vanilla 1650 that's his problem.

OP said (not super)

 

[eidairaman1]

Skip it, it is doa