• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Kraken JavaScript benchmark 1.1

screen26.png


Result: 389.9 ms
Software: ALT Sisyphus -- LXQt -- Chromium version 120.0.6051.2 -- proprietary Nvidia driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
 
Vivaldi 6.4.3160.47 (Stable channel)
Windows 11 Pro Insider Beta Channel 23H2 22635.2850
Other specs see signature below

kraken-13.12.23.jpg
 
Jh7hAi6.png


Result: 457.8 ms
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD -- Chromium version 120.0.6099.216 -- bspwm -- open source GPU driver
 
Ekran görüntüsü 2024-01-21 183815.png

Ryzen 7900 with unlocked PBO power.
 
BvIiELW.png


Result: 385.7 ms
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Alpine Linux -- Vivaldi Flatpak version -- river wm -- open source GPU driver

This is the Flatpak version of Vivaldi that I am using here. What I have noticed in my many tests is that Vivaldi's RPM packages can outperform the Flatpak package in (many) tests with a difference that is sometimes around 10%. If I were to select the fastest RPM distribution and also use the RPM package, it might be possible for me to score higher than the above result.
 
9uf7Ko9.png


Result: 384.4 ms
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Alpine Linux, sway wm, Mesa open-source driver, Vivaldi (stable version)

I also tested my realme C3 and the result really surprised me. It scores a result higher than 10 000.
Based on the result of my realme C3, I have to say that desktop systems that are 12 years old are still quite good for surfing. (compared to some recent budget smartphones)

With my latest result, I let the Intel 12600K score about as high as the Intel Core i5-14500 (14th generation) scores here:

Selenium Benchmark - OpenBenchmarking.org

openbenchmarking.org openbenchmarking.org

I can score under 380 ms with certain software combinations that I haven't tested yet.
 
(system spec's in usual spot)

java.jpg
 
<--Specs

1712839505158.png
 
Vivaldi6.6.3271.57 (Stable channel) (64-bit)
OSWindows 11 Version 23H2 (Build 22631.3447)

2024-04-12 01.17.34 mozilla.github.io f3c27233b809.jpg

Result: 373.9ms

AMD RyZen 7 7800X3D stock clocks, GSkil Trident Z5 DDR 5 6000, Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD gen4 x4
 
Vivaldi: 6.6.3271.57
Windows 11 Pro Beta Insider Channel: 23H2 22635.34

kraken-12.4.24.jpg


system detail 4.3.24.jpg
 
Vivaldi6.6.3271.61 (Stable channel) (64-bit)
OSWindows 11 Version 23H2 (Build 22631.3447)

2024-04-15 00.36.09 mozilla.github.io 5fcd83fce9c9.jpg


same system as above in my previous post
 
feVtPE8.png


Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- 980 PRO 500GB
Software: OpenBSD, bspwm, open-source GPU driver, UFS file system, Chromium 125.0.6422.76

Chromium has gotten faster in this test on OpenBSD compared to what you can see if you look at my OpenBSD result above.
It currently only needs to be 10% faster to score comparable to (non-security oriented) Linux systems.
 
lolek86 said:
Ryzen 7600@5.5GHZ , -40CO, 6200 tuned memory, windows 11 24h2, chrome 125
View attachment 350543
Click to expand...

windows10/11 is similar to Linux in terms of JS performance, but as far as I know the networking performance of windows and windows server is much slower than Linux.
(Free)BSD used to have faster networking performance than Linux, which makes me suspect that BSD has much faster networking performance than windows.

I would be interested to see what results you get if you test real websites with windows and Ryzen R5 7600 (and specify the speed of your internet).
www.techpowerup.com

Page load time extension results for popular websites

I measured the load times of five of the most popular websites through an extension. You can find this extension in the chrome web store. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/page-load-time/fploionmjgeclbkemipmkogoaohcdbig I think it's nice to measure what the results are in reality...
www.techpowerup.com www.techpowerup.com

 
SchumannFrequency said:
windows10/11 is similar to Linux in terms of JS performance, but as far as I know the networking performance of windows and windows server is much slower than Linux.
(Free)BSD used to have faster networking performance than Linux, which makes me suspect that BSD has much faster networking performance than windows.

I would be interested to see what results you get if you test real websites with windows and Ryzen R5 7600 (and specify the speed of your internet).
www.techpowerup.com

Page load time extension results for popular websites

I measured the load times of five of the most popular websites through an extension. You can find this extension in the chrome web store. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/page-load-time/fploionmjgeclbkemipmkogoaohcdbig I think it's nice to measure what the results are in reality...
www.techpowerup.com www.techpowerup.com

Click to expand...

No problem, I will reply in thread in a moment.
 
uwmkddX.png


Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, PeKWM, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system, Chrome 128.0.6559.0
 
hFWWxRU.png


Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD, bspwm, Mesa open-source driver, UFS file system, Chromium 126.0.6478.182
 
tS1b5sP.png


Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: OpenBSD, bspwm, Mesa open-source driver, UFS file system, Chromium 127.0.6533.72

OpenBSD -current is already very stable on Intel Alder Lake + AMD RDNA 3.0
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top