Post your 3dmark06 SCORES !!!! =p

[zOaib]

well my x1800xt at stock speeds dished out a whoopin

3700 , HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAh !!!

 

[KennyT772]

single core P4 3.0@3.2 HT
radeon 9600pro 256meg
512mb ram corsair

432 marks
208 sm2
589 cpu score

 

[zAAm]

Has anyone gotten more than 1fps on the CPU tests yet? My first run is 0.2fps and the second is like 0.45fps or something. You'd need a killer of a dual core CPU to actually see what's happening in those tests!

 

[Macoland]

X800GTO OC'ed gave me 2070

 

[BIOHazard87]

2091 with a Intel 2.8E @ 3.33 | 1.388 vcore and a ATI X850 PRO @ 16 pipes 526/567


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8281

 

[Lekamies]

A64 3000+ venice@2736Mhz & C3D x800gto@16pp 630/555 (pci-e 8x) gives 2472

 

[zOaib]

 

[Kryten]

2739 not too shabby with my setup..

 

[infrared]

wtf... have you got a screenshot??

I beat your 3dmark05 score by miles (6186), yet you leave me standing here by more than 600 points!

I think your 3dmark03, 3dmark05 and AQ3 scores are lined up about right... but the 3dmark06 seems too good!

 

[Kryten]

what resolution did you have it on? i set mine to 1024X768 the same that i play games at.

 

[infrared]

default... i didn't touch the settings

Very nice scores thought! All of them!

 

[Kryten]

here you go i had to run it again cause i didnt have a screen shit of the first run.

 

[Kryten]

default... i didn't touch the settings

Very nice scores thought! All of them!

thanks

and i changed my sig to match my screenshot.

 

[infrared]

cool... i wander what's holding my card back?!?! I got 2097

 

[W2hCYK]

2460 or whatever my sig currently says, i keep it updated, lol...

check stats to left

 

[Lekamies]

2739 not too shabby with my setup..

Run test with default settings (1280x1024), then we can compare.

 

[GeeForce11]

4553 3DM06 with my X1800XL 700/700 1.4/2.2/2.0 WaterCooled & 2.65GHZ X2

SM2=1765
HDR/SM3=1839
CPU=1939

 

[Kryten]

Run test with default settings (1280x1024), then we can compare.

2147 on defualt settings

 

[Solaris17]

819

sm2.0 397
cpu 777

puter was runnin all day system on the left its updated ill try again with closed programs no running processes a defrag etc.... maybe a tad more oc'in and ill break a grand :-D

 

[AMDCam]

I got 1912 on my laptop (specs under this message), pretty happy. The tests suck in my opinion, they're not good looking (like WOW, this is the future), especially that dumbass sand level, that has HORRIBLE graphics and I'm guessing it's just one of those "eat up RAM" level tests, I don't see HDR or SM3.0 effects anywhere in it. Also most of the tests are updates from 3DMark 03 and 05. I know graphics and the scenes have nothing to do with what the application is built for, but dang, they could have put a little effort into it for our entertainment. It's not even fun to watch the FPS anymore because you've already seen the clips, there's nothing new

 

[ThorAxe]

4105

Sm2.0 1772
Hdr/sm3.0 1823
Cpu 1102

 

[Solaris17]

I got 1912 on my laptop (specs under this message), pretty happy. The tests suck in my opinion, they're not good looking (like WOW, this is the future), especially that dumbass sand level, that has HORRIBLE graphics and I'm guessing it's just one of those "eat up RAM" level tests, I don't see HDR or SM3.0 effects anywhere in it. Also most of the tests are updates from 3DMark 03 and 05. I know graphics and the scenes have nothing to do with what the application is built for, but dang, they could have put a little effort into it for our entertainment. It's not even fun to watch the FPS anymore because you've already seen the clips, there's nothing new

exactly i hate battle of proxycon and errrr i hate it!!!!!!!! its soooo boring give me a pretty level with cool colors and stuff like the forest tests or something.......3dmark 06 -10 pts

 

[infrared]

i'm gonna get an x850xt mastercard to go in crossfire with my x800, then we'll see what happens!

i agree though 3dmark06 is crap. All they've done is turn the resolution up a tad, and put some more detail into it. Wasn't worth downloading and i cirtainly won't be buying it (not that i would anyway! )

 

[trog100]

anything that isnt an X1000 latest generation ATI card or late-ish nvidia card dosnt do SM.30..

this puts the overclocked x850 or x800 ati cards out of the running.. the canyon and the deep freeze tests do not get run and do not get counted in the scores..

as far as these earlier generation ati cards go.. 3dmark2006 no longer produces an accurate real world gaming comparison..

also unless u run the benchmark at it default settings there aint much bloody point in posting scores for comparison.. he he he

mine are about 2300 if i max everthing out.. not much point for
a benchmark that my card wont run properly..

in the real world if your card dosnt do SM.3 in a game it just gets turned off and your frame rates go up.. which of course is why 2006 dosnt let such cards run the SM 3.0 loaded tests..

my system..

gto2 16 pipes clocked 616/630 scores just over 7000 in 2005

cpu amd 64 at 2.9 gig.. my single core chip probably also gets a downgrade in 2006 cos i am sure it will be dual core biased..

for todays real world games and half the gaming systems on the planet 2006 probably gives a totally false result.. at best its just a guess at what might be tommorow.. when (if) games get SM.30 loaded and are optimized for dual cpus.. that one for quite some time to come is just a big "IF"...

trog

ps.. and looking at the difference tweem proxycon 2005 and proxycon 2006 at 1/4 the frames rates.. errr four of my current cards running together to get the same fps.. well i recon someone has lost the plot.. he he he

 

[AMDCam]

Damn thorax congrats on that. I literally am getting each spec you've got except my graphics card is gonna be a 7800GT 256mb for SLI and cheapness. I got double the power of my old hardware to look forward to now. Thanks for that score lol