• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Question reguarding the use of External SSDs in motherboards USB headers

GabrielLP14

SSD DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
337 (0.24/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name Gabriel-PC
Processor Core i7-13700K (All Core 5.7GHz)
Motherboard MSI Z790-P PRO WIFI DDR4
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory 32GB Netac DDR4-3200 MT/s CL-16
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Super Colorful
Storage Memblaze P7940 7.68TB Gen5 (OS), Solidigm P44 2TB (Games) + 4x 4TB WD Black HD (Synology NAS DS1817)
Display(s) AOC G2460PF 144Hz 1ms (Kinda trash)
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Black
Audio Device(s) Motherboard onboard audio (good enough for me)
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X
Mouse Have no idea (Generic)
Keyboard Have no idea (Generic)
Software Windows 11 Pro 23H2 + Windows Server 2022 + Synology in NAS
Hey everyone, i have a good understandings of how SSDs work, however one question that i'm having trouble to find detailed information online is this:

Imagine the following scenario, you just bought a new USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) and your motherboard has a Type-C connector for it, however it's wired to an ASMedia ASM3242 (Bridge Controller), the performance would be great, and this was very common on these first gen board that came with USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 since these Chipsets like Z490 didn't have native support for USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 inside of them. Ok, however these new boards like Z590, a lot of them already offer supports for this connection wired directly for the PCH, which is cool, but i assume it could cause some higher latency performance, correct? Would there be a performance difference between then?

PS: Pardon my bad english, it's been a long time since i don't practice it
 
I doubt you'll see a huge latency difference, but yes, different USB host controllers perform differently.
I haven't done any testing since USB 3.0 was the hot stuff, but back then there was quite a big difference in performance between different host controllers.

For the ASM3242 it'll also depend on how it's connected to the chipset, as some board vendors have been known to only use one instead of two PCIe lanes for some of these types of chips.

Overall, I don't think you'll see a huge difference if the ASM3242 is integrated properly, compared to a native port.

You can find some testing here https://www.anandtech.com/show/16133/usb-32-gen-2x2-state-of-the-ecosystem-review
 
I'd agree pretty much with @TheLostSwede on this. Probably you could see some differences on synthetic benchmarks, but in real use, probably not.
 
I haven't done any testing since USB 3.0 was the hot stuff, but back then there was quite a big difference in performance between different host controllers.
First of all thanks for answering, and thats why i was asking ahah, i remember how it was like back in a day.
 
First of all thanks for answering, and thats why i was asking ahah, i remember how it was like back in a day.
Yep, some of the X58 era early usb 3.0 addon controllers were truly trash.
 
Back
Top