- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,278 (0.51/day)
- Location
- UK-small Village in a Valley Near Newcastle
Processor | I9 9900KS @ 5.3Ghz |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gagabyte z390 Aorus Ultra |
Cooling | Nexxxos Nova 1080 + 360 rad |
Memory | 32Gb Crucial Balliastix RGB 4.4GHz |
Video Card(s) | MSI Gaming X Trio RTX 3090 (Bios and Shunt Modded) 2.17GHz @ 38C |
Storage | NVME / SSD RAID arrays |
Display(s) | 38" LG 38GN950-B, 27" BENQ XL2730Z 144hz 1440p, Samsung 27" 3D 1440p |
Case | Thermaltake Core series |
Power Supply | 1.6Kw Silverstone |
Mouse | Roccat Kone EMP |
Keyboard | Corsair Viper Mechanical |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Right, just a Q out of curiosity...
I can have 2 overclocks resulting in say approx 2.97ghz on my opty 185:
1) 11x multiplyer and 270fsb resulting in 2970Mhz overclock,
2) 8x multiplyer and 372fsb resulting in 2976Mhz overclock (ignore the extra 6mhz)
Which overclock, both resulting in the same cpu frequency would yield the highest performance?
Does the fsb really make such a difference or is it just the final outcome, aka the distination and not the journey to be philosophical
I can have 2 overclocks resulting in say approx 2.97ghz on my opty 185:
1) 11x multiplyer and 270fsb resulting in 2970Mhz overclock,
2) 8x multiplyer and 372fsb resulting in 2976Mhz overclock (ignore the extra 6mhz)
Which overclock, both resulting in the same cpu frequency would yield the highest performance?
Does the fsb really make such a difference or is it just the final outcome, aka the distination and not the journey to be philosophical