- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,942 (0.60/day)
System Name | Widow |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7600x |
Motherboard | AsRock B650 HDVM.2 |
Cooling | CPU : Corsair Hydro XC7 }{ GPU: EK FC 1080 via Magicool 360 III PRO > Photon 170 (D5) |
Memory | 32GB Gskill Flare X5 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 1080 TI |
Storage | Samsung 9series NVM 2TB and Rust |
Display(s) | Predator X34P/Tempest X270OC @ 120hz / LG W3000h |
Case | Fractal Define S [Antec Skeleton hanging in hall of fame] |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar Xense with AKG K612 cans on Monacor SA-100 |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-850 |
Mouse | Razer Naga 2014 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | FFXIV ARR Benchmark 12,883 on i7 2600k 15,098 on AM5 7600x |
From what I know exists, there's :
860
870
875
930
950
960
970
980X
Brief understanding is that :
A) 800 series lacks Quickpath and triple channel DDR3 support
B) 970 and 980 are hexacores
C) 980 unlocked multiplier
With this in mind, I've seen some (for example) 875s with a moderate overclock, out performing 930s and 950s in real world program scenarios, yet they lack the the Quickpath and additional RAM support.
Are these two features of any day to day value versus potentially better overclocking? Is there a correlation?
Also, any threads going about Intel chips on 2011 roadmap?
860
870
875
930
950
960
970
980X
Brief understanding is that :
A) 800 series lacks Quickpath and triple channel DDR3 support
B) 970 and 980 are hexacores
C) 980 unlocked multiplier
With this in mind, I've seen some (for example) 875s with a moderate overclock, out performing 930s and 950s in real world program scenarios, yet they lack the the Quickpath and additional RAM support.
Are these two features of any day to day value versus potentially better overclocking? Is there a correlation?
Also, any threads going about Intel chips on 2011 roadmap?