• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

What 1440p freesync monitor?

Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
24 (0.01/day)
Processor Ryzen 2600
Motherboard MSI B450 Gamin Carbon Pro AC
Cooling Corsair h100x
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair LPX 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56 Sapphire Pulse
Storage SSW WD Blue 500GB
Case iTek lunar 23r2
Audio Device(s) Asus Strix Raid Pro
Power Supply EVGA 750W BQ
Mouse Razer
Keyboard Coolermaster Devastator
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I'm looking for a monitor with 1440p resolution, I prefer the quality instead the speed so a 75hz Freesync is perfect for me and my Vega56.

Dell S2719DM?
Iiyama Prolite XUB2792QSU-B1?
Acer Nitro VG270U?

Others???
 
that dell is 60hz
Q3279VWFD8 is a nice budget option if you want 32",but it's a big,cheap IPS so I worry the backlight bleed will be outrageous
 
Last edited:
that dell is 60hz
Q3279VWFD8 is a nice budget option if you want 32",but it's a big,cheap IPS so I worry the backlight bleed will be outrageous
yeah 60hz with Freesync so is 75hz refresh!
 
I'd stay at 27" for 1440p.

PPI is simply too low for 1440p at 32" IMO. If you have seen 1080p on 27" it's pretty much the same thing. I can see the pixels from normal sitting distance.

I'd also get more than 75 Hz tbh. With LFC support.

Budget?
 
The Iiyama would be a good choice.
 
I'd stay at 27" for 1440p.

PPI is simply too low for 1440p at 32" IMO. If you have seen 1080p on 27" it's pretty much the same thing. I can see the pixels from normal sitting distance.

I'd also get more than 75 Hz tbh. With LFC support.

Budget?
about 400 euro
 
PPI is simply too low for 1440p at 32" IMO. If you have seen 1080p on 27" it's pretty much the same thing. I can see the pixels from normal sitting distance.
It is the same as 24" 1080p, if that is too low for you, ok, but for most people is just right, me included.
I'd also get more than 75 Hz tbh. With LFC support.
I agree that 144hz is better than 75Hz, but at 1440p you need at least a 1080Ti to go over 75 fps with Ultra details on 1440p resolution in AAA games.
@floop tell us what GPU and CPU you have or fill System Specs from your profile.
 
It is the same as 24" 1080p, if that is too low for you, ok, but for most people is just right, me included.

I agree that 144hz is better than 75Hz, but at 1440p you need at least a 1080Ti to go over 75 fps with Ultra details on 1440p resolution in AAA games.
@floop tell us what GPU and CPU you have or fill System Specs from your profile.
i have ryzen 2600 oc, 16gb ddr4 3000, ssd WD and a Vega 56 pulse...
 
I'm sure your next GPU upgrade will make your games run above 75fps easily.
Better look at 144/165Hz 1440p monitors, this way you can still use it with future GPU upgrades IMO.
 
Last edited:
Vega 56 is capable of a lot at 1440p too. I had gtx 1080 and it was ripping 1440p. +90 fps is probably very achievable on v56 since I could get +100 fps on plenty of games using gtx1080. Especially shooters where it matters most,like for example
BF1 ran well over 100fps
Batllefront 2 ran at around 100 fps
Division 2 was only getting like 80,I get well over 100 with a 1080Ti though.110-120 mostly.
Shadow Warrior 2 slightly above 100 fps most of the times
Prey ran at 100 fps or close to it
DOOM could go as high as 130-150 fps
Wolfenstein got above 100 fps too
Dying Light 100 or close
all at max quality

A 27" 1440p 144hz monitor you probably won't be upgrading for a long while.Your next gpu upgrade will push a 1440p 144hz monitor close to its capabilities. IMO it's worth it cause 100-120 fps is very noticeable over 75.I'm only slightly concerned with how ryzen can push high refresh gaming.For v56 it's fine,for a ~2080 or equivalent it'd most likely bottleneck in many cases.
 
Last edited:
Well 165 Hz monitors are Gsync, but 144 Hz is fine. You can get that for 400 bucks.
75 Hz is kinda worthless, it's pretty much the same as 60 Hz and VRR is useless because most of those monitors are 48-75 Hz without LFC!

I see a big improvement over 60 Hz at 90+ (pref. 100+ Hz/fps) and you should be able to get that if you compromise on image quality slightly.

I can't tell 60 Hz from 75 Hz. I've even seen some of those 75 Hz monitors do frameskipping because it's simply OC'ed 60 Hz panels..
 
Well 165 Hz monitors are Gsync, but 144 Hz is fine. You can get that for 400 bucks.
75 Hz is kinda worthless, it's pretty much the same as 60 Hz and VRR is useless because most of those monitors are 48-75 Hz without LFC!

I see a big improvement over 60 Hz at 90+ (pref. 100+ Hz/fps) and you should be able to get that if you compromise on image quality slightly.

I can't tell 60 Hz from 75 Hz. I've even seen some of those 75 Hz monitors do frameskipping because it's simply OC'ed 60 Hz panels..
well 75 fps is a noticeable upgrade over 60 for my eyes,but yeah +90 is where you want it.
 
I confess that i didn't see the difference between my actual AOC VA 1080p144 freesync with Vega56 beetween the Dell 1080p60 and Nvidia gtx970 about lag, response etc...
For this reason I looking for 75hz freesync monitor... asd it's strange? maybe but it's the true

well 75 fps is a noticeable upgrade over 60 for my eyes,but yeah +90 is where you want it.
for your eyes but not for mine ahahah
 
You could also consider Dell U2515H/U2715H or something if you don't really care about the gaming performance that much. 60 Hz 1440p AH-IPS with decent input lag and okay'ish pixel response times.
 
I confess that i didn't see the difference between my actual AOC VA 1080p144 freesync with Vega56 beetween the Dell 1080p60 and Nvidia gtx970 about lag, response etc...
For this reason I looking for 75hz freesync monitor... asd it's strange? maybe but it's the true


for your eyes but not for mine ahahah
I mostly see more fluid animation at higher fps,but lower lag is something I notice while playing too.I'm not much of a competitive player though so frankly I don't care about lag that much as long as it isn't something terrible like v-sync on at 60 fps.

but if you don't care then go for 75hz,sure.You can also try 3440x1440 although that'll cost you.
 
Last edited:
I mostly see more fluid animation at higher fps,but lower lag is something I notice while playing fps too.I'm not a hardcore player so frankly I don't care about lag that much as long as it isn't something terrible like v-sync on at 60 fps.

but if you don't care then go for 75hz,sure.You can also try 3440x1440 although that'll cost you.
3440x1400 are the resolution of monitor 21/9, are too big for my desk...!!!

Iiyama Prolite XUB2792QSU-B1

this? Costs 320 euros on Amazon IT...
 
Back
Top