- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
- Messages
- 3,188 (1.95/day)
- Location
- Germany
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock B850M PRO-A |
Cooling | Corsair Nautilus 360 RS |
Memory | 2x32GB Kingston Fury Beast 6000 CL30 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Hellhound RX 9070 XT |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 990 Pro, 2TB Samsung 990 Pro, 4TB Samsung 990 Pro |
Display(s) | LG 27GS95QE-B, MSI G272QPF E2 |
Case | Lian Li DAN Case A3 Black Wood Edition |
Audio Device(s) | Bose Companion Series 2 III, Sennheiser GSP600 and HD599 SE - Creative Soundblaster X4 |
Power Supply | Corsair RM1000X ATX 3.1 |
Mouse | Razer Deathadder V3 |
Keyboard | Razer Black Widow V3 TKL |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift S |
i own four Sapphire GPUs at the moment.
all of them have thermal paste on them that is actually worse than the worst available thermal paste on the market.
even my 6900XT Nitro+ has thermal paste on it that is so bad that my arctic MX2 (bought when haswell released!) is almost 20°C better than what sapphire has.
i don't understand how a company that uses thermal compound on a die that is so bad that you can not even find something to compare against.
for example:
6900XT Nitro+
264W load 108°C Hotspot and 81°C Edge with 2900RPM fanspeed.
repaste with arctic MX2 from late 2013:
264W load 81°C Hotspot 68°C Edge with 2150RPM fanspeed.
what is sapphire even thinking?
all of them have thermal paste on them that is actually worse than the worst available thermal paste on the market.
even my 6900XT Nitro+ has thermal paste on it that is so bad that my arctic MX2 (bought when haswell released!) is almost 20°C better than what sapphire has.
i don't understand how a company that uses thermal compound on a die that is so bad that you can not even find something to compare against.
for example:
6900XT Nitro+
264W load 108°C Hotspot and 81°C Edge with 2900RPM fanspeed.
repaste with arctic MX2 from late 2013:
264W load 81°C Hotspot 68°C Edge with 2150RPM fanspeed.
what is sapphire even thinking?