• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What kind of weird resolution is this?

Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
3,476 (0.60/day)
Location
Czech republic
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Asus TUF-Gaming B550-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo F4-3600C16D-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Nitro+
Storage HP EX950 512GB + Samsung 970 PRO 1TB
Display(s) Cooler Master GP27Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster AE-5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME Ultra 650W Gold
Mouse Roccat Kone AIMO Remastered
Software Windows 10 x64
I am passively looking for a new work notebook for my wife, and have noticed some of them have really weird display resolution I haven't seen before: 2048×1280. What is this? That's not an aspect ratio I recognize. I can't find it on Wiki in any standards list either.
Does anyone know anything about this?
 
I am passively looking for a new work notebook for my wife, and have noticed some of them have really weird display resolution I haven't seen before: 2048×1280. What is this? That's not an aspect ratio I recognize. I can't find it on Wiki in any standards list either.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Judging by the numbers alone, it's much closer to 16:10 than 16:9.

Or maybe 15:11. :D
 
Unsurprisingly Wikipedia has an article about the 16:10 aspect ratio:


As it points out, the 16:10 aspect ratio became the most popular aspect ratio by 2008 for non-CRT displays. That's unsurprising to me, I owned a 24" Dell LCD flatpanel monitor that was 1920x1200 pixels, purchased around 2004. It lasted thirteen years.

The 16:10 Dell was replaced in 2018 by a 16:9 aspect ratio LG monitor (27", 3840x2160 pixels) which -- as the article mentions -- had become the more popular aspect ratio by 2010.

I've owned a number of notebook PCs since 2002 and most of them had a display aspect ratio of something other than 16:9. While I didn't own any the 17" Mac notebooks from 2003-2004 had 16:10 displays so it's certainly not a "new" aspect ratio.

My current iPad mini 6th generation has an aspect ratio pretty close to 16:10.
 
Last edited:
It's 16:10, my favourite widescreen aspect ratio. I have three 24in and two 30in monitors in this ratio.

For laptops, I like 3:2 aspect ratio, to display DSLR images full screen, with no black borders.

16:10 is not as common as 16:9 or old 4:3, but it's handy if you want more "height" on spreadsheets and documents.
 
Yeah, I can dig the sentiment, a 16:10 is a much better aspect ratio than a 16:9. My Fujitsu Siemens 1920x1200 unfortunately died a year ago.
 
I'm on 16:10 with the LG GRAM and wouldn't trade it for anything. 17" of 2560x1600 perfection. I know, bigger than the usual more appealing compact laptops for easier portability but thats how I roll.

16:9 looks too squished for my liking but might suit some for media/gaming/etc or general use at the cost of more scrolling action. The 16:10 extra vertical space is definitely useful for the heavier work related productivity stuff hence no squished letterbox peek holes for me. You naughty toms! We know what the 16:9'ers are watching at that peeping tom aspect ratio hehe
 
Oh, the numbers seemed so weird I didn't even try to divide them, lol :D

16:10 is awesome, only finding an external monitor with such AR is close to impossible these days, especially if you want something higher res :(
 
I've noticed that many retailers market 2560x1440 (1440p) displays as "2K." Am I correct in assuming, at least in the consumer space, any panel with a horizontal resolution in the 2000s (e.g. 2048, 2560) is generally referred to as 2K?
Yes that's true however, I will say some marketing weenies may stretch the technical facts a little. So be sure to refer to your friend, Bing DDG Google to be sure.
 
Back
Top