- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Messages
- 137 (0.03/day)
- Location
- Northern California
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5800X3D |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus Ultra X570 |
Cooling | Cooler Master ML360R AIO w/ 6 fans in push/pull |
Memory | 64GB G'Skill DDR4 3600 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4080 FE |
Storage | Samsung 960 Pro + Samsung 980 Pro |
Display(s) | Samsung C32HG70 32" 1440P 144Hz |
Case | Corsair Obsidian 800D |
Audio Device(s) | X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro + Maverick Audio TubeMagic D2 DAC |
Power Supply | Superflower Leadex III Gold 850w |
Mouse | Logitech G600 |
Keyboard | Corsair K55 |
its hardware limitation not driver ,run dx11 on hd 4000 is impossible,its not only tesselation
That is simply wrong. DirectX11 is able to run directly on DirectX10 and 10.1 hardware. I explained how it is able to do that quite clearly in my previous post even including developer documentation directly from Microsoft for further reading. Plugging your ears and repeating your incorrect assumptions isn't going to change the facts here.
Please post a list of successful games that ran on dx10 cards through dx11 executable.
How about a list of DX11 games that don't run on DX10.1 hardware? It would be a pretty short list, if it had any games on it at all, because that would be the exception rather than the rule.
I've run my 4870x2 cards for many years now and I can't think of even one single DirectX11 game that has ever given me issues when played on my DirectX10.1 hardware.
I didnt mean that DX10 could run DX11 games. I meant that most DX10 and DX11 games have DX9.0 support and it can look almost the same. Most people won't notice the visual quality difference so it isnt worth losing frame rate on small selection of games for effects you won't care about.
In no way does Running a DirectX11 game on 10 or 10.1 hardware mean you have to revert back to using DirectX9. The reason games still include a DirectX9 executable has nothing to do with DX10/10.1 hardware, but rather, so that the game is able to run on WindowsXP.