qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 17,865 (2.98/day)
- Location
- Quantum Well UK
System Name | Quantumville™ |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D14 |
Memory | 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz) |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio |
Storage | Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB |
Display(s) | ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible) |
Case | Cooler Master HAF 922 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe |
Power Supply | Corsair AX1600i |
Mouse | Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow |
Keyboard | Yes |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit |
Nice to see when a judge understands the obvious, isn't it? I do wonder how many of those others who "don't get it" have actually been bought and paid for? They might just be clueless, but we can't discount corruption, especially with the links that some of them have with the content industry.
Thankfully, it's not the first time that such a subpoena has been denied, which should actually happen every single time, given that the evidence is faulty. We need more people like Judge Ungaro standing up to Big Content.
The link shows the full judgement.
https://torrentfreak.com/judge-ip-address-doesnt-identify-a-movie-pirate-150410
Thankfully, it's not the first time that such a subpoena has been denied, which should actually happen every single time, given that the evidence is faulty. We need more people like Judge Ungaro standing up to Big Content.
Due to the risk of 'false positives', an allegation that an IP address is registered to an individual is not sufficient in and of itself to support a claim that the individual is guilty of infringement,” wrote the Judge citing a 2012 case, one of many examples.
As in those cases, Plaintiff here fails to show how geolocation software can establish the identity of the Defendant. Specifically, there is nothing linking the IP address location to the identity of the person actually downloading and viewing the copy righted material and nothing establishing that the person actually lives in this district. Even if this IP address is located within a residence, geolocation software cannot identify who have access to that residence’s computer and who would actually be using it to infringe Plaintiff’s copyright
The link shows the full judgement.
https://torrentfreak.com/judge-ip-address-doesnt-identify-a-movie-pirate-150410