1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

7 mm Won't Cut It, Intel Wants 5 mm-Thick Drives for Ultrabooks

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 12, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Custodian of the Ultrabook specification, Intel pushed the storage industry to churn out slimmer devices to go with increasingly slimmer Ultrabooks sold by the various partner ODMs in the ecosystem. Even as HDD and SSD makers have only just come up with 7 mm-thick storage devices, Intel has a fresh list of changes it wishes to see with storage devices in the very near future, to be able to make it to the constantly-evolving Ultrabook specification. Intel wants near-future storage devices (SSDs and HDDs) to be no thicker than 5 mm.

    Further, it wants to see the standard SATA host interface changed from "around" (out of) form, to "along" (inside) form host interface, which further slims down the drive compartment. These proposals were floated at IDF, Beijing. While coming up with slimmer SSDs was never really a tough task for SSD makers, as SSDs are essentially just millimeter-thick printed circuit boards with millimeter-thick components (controller logic, NAND flash memory, and ancillaries), it posed a huge technical challange to mechanical HDD designers, who have had to slim down key components that work to maintain inertial motion of spinning platters. This new proposal for 5 mm-thick HDDs could pose a newer, tougher desgin challenge.

    [​IMG]

    Source: VR-Zone
     
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,537 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,642
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I smell conflict of interest. Intel wants drives unreasonably slimmer (5 mm isn't much slimmer than 7 mm), so it becomes impossible for HDD vendors (they can't go slimmer without impacting performance), and SSD remains the only viable storage device (Intel is a major NAND flash chip vendor for SSDs).
     
    theJesus, w3b, hellrazor and 5 others say thanks.
  3. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,833 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,528
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    Intel's netbook/ultrabook platforms have always been a conflict of interest. Everyone remembers the 10" screen and 1GB maximum RAM limits enforced on Intel netbooks, and then Brazos came along sans restrictions and wiped the floor with them.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,607 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    919
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Actually the limit was at 1,5GB RAM. Where 512MB was already integrated on-board. I've had one of those suckers...
     
  5. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,825 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Lol they are complaining about 2 whole mm! Who cares...
     
  6. Vulpesveritas

    Vulpesveritas

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    383 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    85
    Location:
    USA
    Umm... the HDD manufacturers which have to figure out how to shrink their mechanical data storage device height by 29%?
     
  7. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,919 (6.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,020
    The screen limit was just to call it a netbook(and frankly, anything larger than 10" shouldn't be called a netbook), the RAM and HDD limit(first 80GB then 160GB) was to be able to put an essentially free edition of Windows Home on it.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  8. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,204 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    974
    Location:
    Miami
    Intel is squeezing the platters out of ultrabooks
     
  9. ice_v

    ice_v

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    111 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    Italy
    it's just not enough!

    I want them to be also transparent! :mad:
     
  10. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,825 (1.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    I should have worded that differently, I was talking about Intel complaining. As i think it would be hard to make HDD's smaller.
     
  11. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,170 (2.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,657
    This isnt exactly true, Intel sold their stake in IMFT to micron.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  12. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,180 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    834
    Won't cut it! GET IT?!
    LOLOLOL
     
  13. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,390 (4.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,455
    intel sounds more like apple everyday
     
    de.das.dude says thanks.
  14. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    They were never that different in the first place ;)
     
    yogurt_21 says thanks.
  15. cmberry20

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    145 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Location:
    Worcester, England
    de.das.dude says thanks.
  16. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    697 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Doesn't matter, HDD's for notebooks are irrelevant anyways. SSD's rule in this category. If we were talking desktops, I'd be concerned, as it'll be a while before a 2 TB SSD is affordable enough for most consumers.
     
  17. cmberry20

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    145 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Location:
    Worcester, England
  18. imitation

    imitation New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    131 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    "Image courtesy of Western Digital". I'd think they have figured it out already.

    So you'd call a 11" Brazos device a "laptop"? C'mon.

    They've been around since 1999, probably earlier: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microdrive
     
  19. eddman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    Messages:
    35 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Guess you haven't realized that the hdd you linked to is a 1.8 inch. Currently there are no 2.5 HDDs slimmer than 7 mm.

    Yeah, and it's just 1 inch. How much storage is possible to get out of that.
     
  20. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,919 (6.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,020
    Yes, I would.

    And do you think it will be harder to get 5mm in the 2.5" form factor? It won't. The fact is we already have 5mm drives in even smaller form factors, so making a 5mm drive in the larger 2.5" form factor should be easy. However, performance will likely suffer.

    And with current platter densities, I'd guess 160GB would be easy in a 1" Microdrive today.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2012
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  21. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Agreed. And rotating the connector to make it incompatible with 100% of existing drives, or indeed, 100% of future competition, is an Intel Stink Bomb to OEMs and upgraders.

    I generally like companies encouraging industry wide progress. But this "new incompatible" standard just aint it. :mad:
     
    w3b says thanks.
  22. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Not sure what you mean there, after all Ultrabooks are meant to be flagship products, and mechanical drives does not provide flagship performance. Laptops will still be around for those who can't or don't want to afford the thinness provided by Ultrabooks, or need extra space. The threat by tablets must be pushing Intel quite hard to maintain the status quo.
     
  23. cheesy999

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,919 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    581
    Location:
    UK
    Maybe for some, but a lot of people now use laptops as their main or even only machine, and a lot of people also store their music/video collection on their laptops, meaning SSD's are not an option for a lot of people at the moment. Since most laptops only support one drive most people can't afford to have an SSD in their laptop.
     
  24. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Laptop is my only machine right now, and I have not even touched 60GB. All of my stuff are in external Harddisks. You can easily get a 2.5" 1TB drive for some money to keep your music collection etc. A careless drop will wipe everything out in your laptop, so most people I know will backup everything they have to a harddrive.
     
    cheesy999 says thanks.
  25. cheesy999

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,919 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    581
    Location:
    UK
    I'm sure you can at least see why the average laptop user might not want to carry a USB hard drive around everywhere, what the point of making the ultrabook smaller if you have to carry around more items just to allow you to store files?
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page