- Joined
- Jan 31, 2005
- Messages
- 2,053 (0.29/day)
- Location
- Denmark
System Name | Commercial towing vehicle "Nostromo" |
---|---|
Processor | 5800X3D |
Motherboard | X570 Unify |
Cooling | EK-AIO 360 |
Memory | 32 GB Fury 3666 MHz |
Video Card(s) | 4070 Ti Eagle |
Storage | SN850 NVMe 1TB + Renegade NVMe 2TB + 870 EVO 4TB |
Display(s) | 25" Legion Y25g-30 |
Case | Lian Li LanCool 216 v2 |
Audio Device(s) | B & W PX7 S2e |
Power Supply | HX1500i |
Mouse | Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition |
Keyboard | Scope II 96 Wireless |
Software | Windows 11 23H2 |
This thread is NOT about beeing Intel/AMD fanboy !!
So I have recently made a shift from a FX-8150 BE to an i5-3570K.
The AMD mobo was a ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2
The Intel mobo is a ASUS Maximus V Gene.
The FX-8150 OC = 4.4 GHz (24/7)
The i5-3570K OC = 4.6 GHz (24/7)
All other stuff is the same (see System Specs)
One of the reasons I made the shift was: I got the stuff really cheap!
Second - I thougt the Intel thing was overall faster.
And here is the question: In allmost all synthetic benchmarks I made myself, the Intel
CPU is faster - BUT in real life use is seems to be slower - why??
I know the FX-8150 has 8 cores and the i5 has 4 (no hyperthreading) - is that the reason??
System boot times and general use (Office/picture viewing/mail etc etc) no noticeable diff.
I crunch (WCG) - there the diff. is huge (due to 4 more cores)
In Freemake Videoconverter the diff. is huge - the FX-8150 is 30% faster.
In games (BF3/FarCry3/Metro2033/Skyrim/Dishonored) I can´t see/feal any diff.
In 3DMark benchmarks the i5 is faster - no doubt.
In a total system scan (with Kaspersky Internet Security) the FX is 10 minutes faster (total scan time is 1 hour and 21 minuts with FX)
So my conclusion is:
The i5-3570K cost around 220 $ and the FX-8150 around 180$
There is no way I can justify to buy and Intel CPU over an AMD.
(If I do benchmarks all the time the answar is YES - but who does that?)
I don´t know if it is right to compare those two CPU´s - if i am totally wrong please slap me
So I have recently made a shift from a FX-8150 BE to an i5-3570K.
The AMD mobo was a ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2
The Intel mobo is a ASUS Maximus V Gene.
The FX-8150 OC = 4.4 GHz (24/7)
The i5-3570K OC = 4.6 GHz (24/7)
All other stuff is the same (see System Specs)
One of the reasons I made the shift was: I got the stuff really cheap!
Second - I thougt the Intel thing was overall faster.
And here is the question: In allmost all synthetic benchmarks I made myself, the Intel
CPU is faster - BUT in real life use is seems to be slower - why??
I know the FX-8150 has 8 cores and the i5 has 4 (no hyperthreading) - is that the reason??
System boot times and general use (Office/picture viewing/mail etc etc) no noticeable diff.
I crunch (WCG) - there the diff. is huge (due to 4 more cores)
In Freemake Videoconverter the diff. is huge - the FX-8150 is 30% faster.
In games (BF3/FarCry3/Metro2033/Skyrim/Dishonored) I can´t see/feal any diff.
In 3DMark benchmarks the i5 is faster - no doubt.
In a total system scan (with Kaspersky Internet Security) the FX is 10 minutes faster (total scan time is 1 hour and 21 minuts with FX)
So my conclusion is:
The i5-3570K cost around 220 $ and the FX-8150 around 180$
There is no way I can justify to buy and Intel CPU over an AMD.
(If I do benchmarks all the time the answar is YES - but who does that?)
I don´t know if it is right to compare those two CPU´s - if i am totally wrong please slap me