Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by mdsx1950, Jul 19, 2010.
I found an interesting article. Thought i'd share it
Samples shipping soon. Nice! I'm trying to be optimistic about performance, hopefully we'll get to see some leaks soon.
Awesome find bro, very interesting
This is looking promising, as long as it leap frogs the current i7 in performance they have a good chance of a good future. Bring on bulldozer.....
Looking forward to leaked specs!
what to do to get a sample?
pft 16 cores...... Bring on the 48 cores @ 5.00GHZ
srsly its not far away now, 3-5 years imo.
really want to see some benchmarks at the same clocks as an i7. wonder if its going to surpass clock for clock.
Bring on the A64 day's were AMD was more expensive , wait is that really good?
I seriously hope that this series of CPUs perform on par with Intels. I'm fed up of seeing AMD as the "weaker" yet cheaper option.
I can not remember the P4 costing more than the Athlon 64. Maybe it was a region thing but over here Intel prices it self higher regardless.
I think it is because that was AMD's priority in designing it. If AMD pumped all the money into R&D and it still falls way short of Intel's offerings, investors would be pissed.
There's no way to be certain though.
48 cores yes. 5GHz, probably not. As clock rate goes up, the heat generated and power consumed by a CPU per unit of performance become prohibitively high—Intel calls it the ”fundamental theorem of multicore processors.” This is a good intro to why the future of computing is massively parallel.
Hoping for memory width higher than 128bit...
And it will surely be interesting to see what new tricks AMD has stuffed in Bulldozer for it's been too much of evolutionary additions and not much of the revolution type since Hammer came back in 2003.
On Wikipedia, it says that the Bulldozer will support quad channel memory. Do you think this might speed up memory bandwidth enough?
QC would mean it's 256bit, double what AM3 has atm. I doubt we'll see that. Buuut I'd like to be wrong on that one. 256bits requires four populated DIMMs - do I hear memory manufacturers screaming "Quad channel kits!!one1"?
Bulldozer should use quad-channel memory (256-bit) AFAIK.
The G34 Opterons are already Quad-channel and has been promised Bulldozer, I doubt AMD will take a step backwards. Its probably gonna be like the i7 and scales back to dual channel with only 2DIMMs inserted.
were there tripple channel kits when skt 775 was dom?
why would they market quad channel kits to a market that dosnt exist?
im fairly certain intel has said they are also going to be using quad channel, with there new R Socket (2011)
As dies continue to shrink, they've got other problems besides heat and power. I remember reading something recently where one scientist said that the speed of light was just too damn slow. Amazing.
i can't wait for the reviews. With all the hype that has been put on these i hope they don't turn out to be another Phenom
All I'm hoping for is backwards compatability to AM3 and performance on par (if not greater) than the current i7 while still keeping it's pricing methods (maybe a bit higher).
Hmm, I smell 48 core Black Editions...
I get the feeling that these procs might dominate the market next year.
^ We hope so that's for sure, and for AMD's sake
If Bulldozer were pin compatible with AM3, which I hope it is not, it would mean it would have only dual channel memory as AM3 doesn't have enough pins for >128bit memory.
I'd like to see desktop BD using LGA1207'ish socket.
and if we pay attention to how amd has done things lately 9/10 the BullDozer chips on AM3 will be like the AM2+ Phenom IIs where the IMC was disabled (thats an EXAMPLE ) its no that far a fetch just because only dual channel could be used dosent mean it wouldnt still be a huge upgrade for ppl with AM3. I hope it uses AM3 because i dont need quadchannel memory. Altho i do 3d rendering etc on my off time ive found that even with huge amounts of data the number of channels dont help as much as more ram. And to be honest id only want the upgrade if bulldozer offered better gaming performance and im pretty sure dual channel DDR3 isnt the bottleneck in that senario.
Another problem is that after a couple of shrinks they're running out of atoms to work with. Then they need new materials.
Separate names with a comma.