im done here your not using reasoned arguments yourself its fail because its not as advanced as intels best thats absolute ass chowder, its not great but mine works fine..
no what i said was they set out to do something said what they were going to do. then cut corners, cut costs. and managed to produce a limp wrist-ed Shadow of what they tried to do..
if i set out to build a house to hold 12 people in comfort. using eco friendly materials, and have renewable energy built in so i had no electricity bills.
then decided to cut corners. Ended up with a shed that could hold 4 people cramped made out of cement and its power came from the national grid, that would be a fail..
If i tried to climb mount Everest, arrived at the bottom and decided to take a shortcut that only took me 1/2 way up then i came back down.. That would be a fail..
so if amd say they are going to make a 8 core low tdp high ghz cpu that will show intel whats what. then all they manage is a over clocked cpu that runs hotter than the sun using twice as much power and at best can only manage to achieve similar performance to an intel chip of the same price. then that is a fail..
If they said We are going to make a ridiculously power hungry and hot cpu that has 4 fully featured cores and then 4 kind of bits of cores added on and call it 8 cores. that will just about manage to compete with an i7 but it will cost you twice as much to run and will need a really good mother board and water cooling to even think about achieving its potential.
Then it would have been what they said.. probably wouldnt have been the best marketing idea ever. and probably wouldnt have sold many. but atleast they would have achieved what they set out to do.
thats pretty well explained as in "amd failed to achieve their goal"
Then we have the fact that
It is power hungry needs a expensive mother board and water cooling to perform the same as the same priced i7..
so thats a fail there again. amd are suposed to provide more bang for your buck. but with this chip they managed to provide less than intel did whilst at the same time costing you more in electricity, and making you pay more for a mother board, also you need really good and expensive cooling..
So thats multiple fails on all points..
so this chip is a fail.
is that reasoned enough for you "mr lets edit my last word in after i think no one will read any more of this"
