1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Unlocked FX Processors Announced

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 12, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,611 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD today unleashed the AMD FX family of CPUs, delivering a fully unlocked and customizable experience for desktop PC users. The AMD FX series of desktop CPUs includes the first-ever eight-core desktop processor, enabling extreme multi-display gaming, mega-tasking and HD content creation for PC and digital enthusiasts – all for less than $245 (suggested U.S. retail price). This marks the first retail availability of processors that use AMD’s new multi-core architecture (codenamed “Bulldozer”), which is included in AMD’s upcoming server CPU (codenamed “Interlagos”) and the next-generation of AMD Accelerated Processing Units.

    “AMD FX CPUs are back with a vengeance, as validated by the recent feat of setting a Guinness World Records title for ‘Highest Frequency of a Computer Processor,’” said Chris Cloran, corporate vice president and general manager, Client Group at AMD. “While overclockers will certainly enjoy the frequencies the AMD FX processors can achieve, PC enthusiasts and HD media aficionados will appreciate the remarkable experience that AMD FX processors can provide as part of a balanced, affordable desktop system.”

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    All AMD FX CPUs offer completely unlocked processor clock multipliers for easier overclocking, paving the way for PC enthusiasts to enjoy higher CPU speeds and related performance gains. Additionally, these processors use AMD Turbo Core Technology to dynamically optimize performance across CPU cores enabling maximum performance for intense workloads.



    Starting today, the below AMD FX CPUs will be available from global retailers. Additional AMD FX CPUs and systems based on the AMD FX processors will be available for purchase following the initial launch.
    • FX-8150: Eight cores, 3.6 GHz CPU base (3.9 GHz Turbo Core, 4.2 GHz Max Turbo), $245 suggested retail price (U.S.)
    • FX-8120: Eight cores, 3.1 GHz CPU base (3.4 GHz Turbo Core, 4.0 GHz Max Turbo), $205 suggested retail price (U.S.)
    • FX-6100: Six cores, 3.3 GHz CPU base (3.6 GHz Turbo Core, 3.9 GHz Max Turbo), $165 suggested retail price (U.S.)
    • FX-4100: Four cores, 3.6 GHz CPU base (3.7 GHz Turbo Core, 3.8 GHz Max Turbo), $115 suggested retail price (U.S.)
    Without spending a small fortune, users can combine an AMD FX CPU with an AMD 9-series chipset motherboard and AMD Radeon HD 6000 series graphics cards to create the AMD “Scorpius” platform for an astounding gaming and HD entertainment experience. As part of the “Scorpius” platform, AMD FX CPUs also support AMD CrossFireX technology, which allows the combination of multiple graphics cards in a PC for stunning visual experiences, and AMD Eyefinity technology support for super resolution on up to six monitors.1 With AMD CatalystControl Center / AMD VISION Engine Control Center, users can get regular updates to help improve system performance and stability, and to add new software enhancements.
     
  2. LDNL

    LDNL

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    464 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Location:
    Finland
    The epic returns as a complite fail. :banghead:
     
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,611 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    In short, FX-8150 gives you:
    • 90~95% the performance of Core i7-2600K
    • 24% lower price
    • Roughly 22% greater performance per dollar
    • Overclocks like Chuck Norris
    No fail.
     
  4. reverze

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,368 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    131
    unless you beat the fastest cpu on the market in every single benchmarkmark while being half the price its considered fail these days.
     
  5. b82rez New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    134 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Hobart, Australia
    Okay, cool! Now give me some benchmarks! :laugh:
     
  6. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    309 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    would the 8150 be worth upgrading from a PII x4 955 @4.1Ghz??? i mostly use for gaming (bc2, bf3, Arma 2 series) what kind of performance INCREASE would i see in GAMES from my current CPU?

    a stock PII x4 955 vs stock 8150 comparison would be fine if someone could provide this info. ( the 8150 should OC even more then 955 so im not worried about OCspeeds since it will be better, i just want stock to stock vs my current CPU)
     
  7. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,611 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    The times are developing a frightening liking for fairy tales, then.

    If I'd get 90~95% Core i7-2600K out-of-box performance for $80 lesser, it overclocks like crazy, and performance scales fairly well with overclocking, I'd jump into it. AMD FX-8150 is ticking all these boxes.
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  8. LDNL

    LDNL

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    464 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Location:
    Finland
    Yet still has way higher power consumption
     
  9. reverze

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,368 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    131
    And thats what is so great about AMD, whatever CPU you buy its always a good deal.

    CPUs are so fast that even a 2.5 year old phenom II 940 plays any game out there perfectly, all this performance unless time is money for the very few encoding for a living, is pure luxery.
     
    Nick89 says thanks.
  10. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    309 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    this is true but really only matters if that is something you are "concerned" about...

    i live in an apartment where electricity is covered for me, so i don't care how much power it sucks up haha
     
    hellrazor says thanks.
  11. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,611 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Power is one ground I can definitely concede.
     
    3volvedcombat says thanks.
  12. Assimilator

    Assimilator

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    617 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    Location:
    South Africa
  13. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    219 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21

    Reviews are out, and it isn't looking so hot unfortunately. It usually struggles to match a 2500k which costs less. In many cases the i930 beats it. Big time fail :shadedshu
     
  14. seronx

    seronx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    993 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    219
    Location:
    USA, Arizona, Maricopa
    W1zard was right I am sorry for doubting your infinite wisdom
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  15. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    These figures are really not what I'm seeing in the many reviews that are out there.
     
    Proph3t and shb- say thanks.
  16. caleb

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,542 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    Location:
    Poland,Slask
    I really hope for a decent review/comparison by Wizzard after all the speculation/spam about these CPU's @TPU.
     
  17. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,936 (2.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,211
    • 100~105% the performance of Core i5-2500K
    • 15% higher price
    • Roughly 15% lesser performance per dollar
     
  18. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,114
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Seems to me that it ticked those boxes were goals, and not facts, based on a lot of the reviews out already at nearly every site...except here.

    I guess I was right, and AMD marketing IS fail.:shadedshu

    Do I really need to go buy a chip and do a review? :laugh: I want to beleive you, I really do.
     
  19. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (1.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    190$ - 200$ for the 8150 and that would be hard to sell. I'm sure we can expect soon heavy price drops.
     
  20. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,936 (2.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,211
    Yeah and it's not even the starting price, right now it's actually ranging from $235-$270. Amazon, Newegg, etc. all have them out of stock though. Microcenter's not putting it out yet as well, there's "impending price updates" apparently.
     
  21. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,952 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    395
    HAHA never seen a try hard video like that one all it was missing was some retard and the end saying how great is it, also if you buy with your credit card you get a free FX DVD for a limited time only :laugh:
     
  22. TheOnlyHero

    TheOnlyHero

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Location:
    Sliven,Bulgaria
    I will be very happy to change my Phenom II X2 with FX-4100: Four cores, 3.6 GHz CPU base (3.7 GHz Turbo Core, 3.8 GHz Max Turbo), $115 suggested retail price (U.S.) :) :toast::rockout::)
     
  23. dieterd New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    120 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    w8 a second! 1100T is roughly the same preformance and costs about 60$ less! AMD you let me down - I will never see 2600k price drop if you do like this :(. and I would rather buy Phenom II if price/preformance would be my priority....
     
  24. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,671 (3.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,266
    When you throw a buttload of threaded workload at them, yes. When not so heavily threaded it falls behind Phenom II (in some cases).
     
  25. naoan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    304 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    62

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page