1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD "Vishera" FX-Series CPU Specifications Confirmed

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Aug 27, 2012.

  1. repman244

    repman244

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,099 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    450
    Do you think that the transition to GCN based integrated GPU won't require a change in socket? I know it is kind of a silly question but still.
  2. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,823 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,899
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I don't see any reason why. GCN uses a similar memory interface as previous chips, and uses similar power, if not less. The changes within the GPU core design aren't really what I think would affect socket design, at all. IT would make hte most sense for them to implement those change NOW, with the FM2-switch, as they should be relatively minort, if for power delivery.

    Of course, I could very well be wrong, but who knows. Overall pwoer consumption soulhd decrease, while perforamcne increases overall. The APUs have the benefit of being able to show increase from both CPU adn GPU design hcanges, while future CPUs will only have the core changes to rely on, which has me far mroe excited for APUs, anyway.
    repman244 says thanks.
  3. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    Is it too late or too early to play this card:

    [​IMG]
    eidairaman1, _JP_, ensabrenoir and 3 others say thanks.
  4. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    That is if they make it that far and they don't completely shut down the company. :roll:
  5. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,754 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    Interesting, if this is true, then AMD is going to release the 8-Core FX CPU's in October 2012 and the 6-Core and Quad-Core in December 2012. Who knows, and I am wondering if it would be worth upgrading my current FX-8120 for the upcoming FX-8320 :confused::D Performance speaks, it all has to do with gaming performance.

  6. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,823 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,899
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    TheLaughingMan says thanks.
  7. WC New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    FPU hopes...

    From all that I have read and what I can estimate, AMD is gearing towards leveraging their GPU to perform the necessary FPU calculations for the CPU. That is why I believe they are pushing HSA and OpenGL programming. They are making headway into clearing up the FMAC and breaking up the decode into one per module though on the CPU so hopefully we can see some performance improvements. I still think there is plenty of headroom for improvements and advancements. This one is a wait and see event, I think AMD has something here, but new architecture is always rough when first starting out.
  8. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,184 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,137
    AMD does have something, I believe it has been called a turd already, now they are just attempting to polish it.

    Poor compared to any equally priced Intel offering, and a step back in performance from the last generation of chips in all except a few specific benchmarks and applications.

    On the server side it isn't much better with their "server" chip.

    AMD has the issue of promising great things and underwhelmingly falling short of even the smallest semblance of those ideas, now their APU series is good for laptops and light weight gaming, but not much else. Now they are talking about "fabric" and all of a sudden they are trying to leverage hardware to run software they hasn't been built, and won't until someone see the need, or pays for it, and historically they won't. And by the time the performance need catches up with the production of such hardware and software the performance of the CPU may overtake what is reasonably needed, thus creating the void AMD keeps falling into.



    Famous for creating hardware with functions that aren't needed to run software that doesn't exist, to fill a self proclaimed need, only to later ignore it. AMD, yep, that's us.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  9. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,550 (1.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Location:
    Australia
    IF OBR slides are correct then im sorta happy realy, i was after a CPU that is as good as a 2600K and going by that it is. Which was AMD's original plan with the 8150, so to bring it up to the 2600K level is good enough for me and worth the upgrade :)
  10. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    I am impressed, i could not have put it better myself.
    That pretty much sums this up Folks.
    You better get use to it.
  11. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    OFFS.
    Some surprise there's no mention of desktop Steamroller in a presentation about plans for HSA family.
    :rolleyes:

    There will be a desktop non-APU Steamroller as long as there's an enterprise non-APU Steamroller in the pipe.
  12. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,371 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    562
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    +1idge ;)
  13. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Keep dreaming :laugh:
    Why was it not mentioned at all then, in any of their presentations?
    They did not even show what they have coming up with vishera piledriver.
    Now you can fall on the floor and start crying. :roll:
  14. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    1. The presentation was about enterprise CPUs, HSA and Fusion
    2. Desktop Steamroller is not part of any of the categories above
    3. You said it, wonder why upcoming desktop Piledriver (Vishera) was not mentioned, either. Strange is it not?

    PS.
    Relax, no need to take this as emotionally as you do.
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  15. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Well they mentioned all the rest except the dedicated performance cpus.
    Doesn't this tell you something?
    Lats time i checked, previous presentation was all about the same things and they have not mentioned anything about performance desktop cpus. Finally someone jumped up and asked them and they responded to that not very warmly. I mean two times in a row????
    I think that tells me something.
  16. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,182 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    186
    I.....think ill wait till the moonraker chips come out.....
  17. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,371 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    562
    Location:
    Manchester uk

    and i think this says it all

    a new intel PR bumphlet about,,,,,,,,,,,,,;) ,,,,,,Harnessing the potential of the gpu to increase application performance:eek::wtf:, intel must be about to close and fall apart and stop selling cpus after all ive not seen a chart for intel past 2020, the end is comeing:p

    http://software.intel.com/sites/bil...iles/PDFs/ISA_GPUProgramming_09Aug(final).pdf
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  18. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    506 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Here you go.

    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 20, 2013
  19. Goodman

    Goodman

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,519 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    324
    Location:
    Canada/Québec/Montreal
    Stupid people & the driver

    As you can see it as a flat wheel maybe something appends that was not his fault?
    But then again the guy seems drunk?

    Anyway punching a guy for that is stupid the best thing to do is get in the "bulldozer" & take the key out so the guy can't go anywhere & wait for police to get there , sad seeing how we still not civilize...

    Cars can be replace we all do have insurance for that sort of thing...

    Back on topic , I am not hoping for something great on the next gen of bulldozer but lets hope it will be at least 15% (25% be better) more performance across the board that would be at least a step forward...
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 20, 2013
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  20. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Did you see what he said?
    "use of GPGPU in that space may be a few years away"
    So always AMD is ahead of time and they fail. The thing is what do we use now.
    And the bulldozer idea was a stupid idea. Tell me how many software and apps have used this arc until now or even games?
  21. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    None, because most games and apps are still 32-bit and built for WinXP. Blame Microsoft for holding back the industry again.

    I don't understand fanboys. You want AMD to fail, yet you don't understand the ramifications.

    Intel has already slowed down innovation. Pretty soon they will be back to their old ways of charging premium prices for marginal upgrades.
    If that happens, the consumer loses.
  22. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,184 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,137
    Microsoft? Try again, they, the game designers are lazy and want to keep reusing the same engine and do a few minor updates. DX11 has been out for quite awhile, and yet look at what we have, the Xbox and PS3 are both multi-core CPU.

    I don't want AMD to fail, no one does. We just grow tired of their bullshit. Call it what it is, and stop trying to dress it up, its fine if they want to sell bulldozer as the worlds fastest 8 core as its the only one, its fine if they want to tout their few wins, but this whole new technology that never materializes is utter crap and is the cause for many to never purchase their hardware again.

    3D gates and 22nm, Knights Corner...... yeah, slowing down.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  23. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,371 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    562
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    oh and good question ,,, what is your system, whys yours not listed


    i really should try ignoreing your trolling but, intel were first to have an on chip vga component,,, intel were way before Amd fitting Fpu units in chips but behind them in x64 so whos best, neither , your way behind the whole concept of progress, and adoption rates,,,

    when everybodys carrying around a quadcore cpu with quad core gpu/gpgpu in their pockets and laptop bags there wont be the issue of who will benefit and what software will use it as it will start to become the norm, and thats not far off in the west, progress happens quicker then you think sometimes ,look at gpu's and soundcards for that matter, literally burst into being the norm from not even existing, you kids sometimes:p

    Another thing has me perplexed, how is a chip thats on par with and sometimes better then a 2600K bad anyway, its a tock + to intel , and a stepping + to AMD , isnt it a bit unreasonable to expect it to beat ivy bridge , i certainly wasnt expecting that, and i love the importance people put on IPC these days , since if they went by the good old time standards of how does it game and do word processing/ photo editing a 5800K APU would piss a 3770K in some benchmarks(clearly soley using onboard gpu/igpu) :p
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  24. AvonX New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    169 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    I do not agree with the other things you said on that post.

    Well that is why i want AMD out of the way already. They are just flooding the market with useless products. They have no competition at all against intel in any market. They are not doing any good to us "consumers". And all this is due to the fact they have decided to go "cheap" a long time ago and they are still cheap on making cpus. With AMD out of the way, the world would be a better place.

    I think they should just hand over the x86 licences they have to someone else who knows how to design chips. "Sooner the better"
  25. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    You should probably stop posting. All do is spout ignorant garbage.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page