1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Build a Gaming Rig or Get a PS3 ?

Discussion in 'System Builder's Advice' started by motasim, Aug 26, 2010.

  1. MN12BIRD

    MN12BIRD

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    471 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    I'm gonna jump in on this one and say this.

    If you're ONLY going to play games on a TV at 1080p and you're worried about the "extra cost" over the PS3 than your system build is WAY overkill. Seriously. Why go s1366 Ci7 at all? I say go s1156 Core i5 760 because that 2.8GHZ quad core has enough power to handle ANY game and the motherboards are cheaper.

    You could build a gaming PC that can run modern games at 1080p for half what you intend to spend and its still going to out power the PS3 graphically. Shit my $900 PC out powers the PS3 in Resident Evil 5 as I can play it at 1080p with more zombies on screen and it still runs at 60FPS. The PS3 can't even do that.

    The Core i7's extra processing power (and perhaps Hyper Threading) might be great for heavy video editing but for strictly gaming at 1080p I think it's overkill myself.

    The super hardcore motherboard might be great for hardcore overclocking but really... who cares. I mean is it really worth it for a few extra FPS here or there? Nope.

    The expensive sound card is overkill too IMHO. You're not a sound engineer or something are you? Onboard sound these days if fine for gaming. Not to mention all modern video cards already have 7.1 surround sound built into them and since you're running to a TV via HDMI you might as well just use the HDMI sound from the video card and save $200 on a sound card. I mean in games you would hardly notice that $200 sound card at all.

    I would just build mid range system with a Cooler Master 690II case, mid range Gigabyte P55 board, Core i5 760, ATi 5870, 4 or 8GB of DDR3 memory, whatever hard drives you need and a BD-ROM drive to play blue rays while you're at it.

    I mean $1,200 could probably do that.

    Then use the left over money to buy a decent Yamaha 5.1 surround receiver with 4x HDMI inputs, a decent 5.1 speaker set and a PS3 just for Gran Turismo 5.

    Bazinga!

    Okay well that's what I would do if I had $2,200 to spend and already had a nice 42" LCD TV and wanted the most gaming entertainment for it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2010
  2. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,914 (3.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,412
    I bet many of the members who bash consoles have a ps3 or x360
     
  3. choppy

    choppy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,173 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    150
    Location:
    UK
    PS3 is of course better value for youur money.

    also you cant play the likes of GT5 / MGS on a pc
     
  4. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,988 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    503
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    I'm guilty of That...LOL
    I have an XBOX 360 But it's only used for games like Guitar Hero as games like FPS are simply better on PC...
     
  5. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,282 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Location:
    Home
    My friend had that debate some time ago, but went to PS3. PS3 is more crowd oriented than the PC . Overall, I think you will get more satisfaction per dollar out of PS3, but if you enjoy small games like defense grid:the awakening, I think PC might be for you. But at the end of the day, I think you will be satisfied with whatever you buy, so flip a coin and buy one on impulse.
     
  6. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,418 (6.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,495
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    I still think the ps3+lower end pc w/high end gpu would be the way to go.
     
  7. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,282 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Location:
    Home
    In other words, get both :shadedshu
     
  8. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,547 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    you can easily overclock a PC, but not a PS3, for thet reason alone I say PC. not to mention far more control over your games (keyboard mouse and a shitload of awesome controllers) and you can do heaps more with a PC anyway, like countless applications etc.

    but really when you weight the costs, a PS3 seems way more cost effective for gaming every so often.
     
  9. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,418 (6.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,495
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    What's wwrong with halving the given budget to get both tho?
     
  10. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,282 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Location:
    Home
    Nothing wrong, but if OP can do this, he would/should have done it without asking us. Its simultaneously the best and the worst advice, because you fix all the problems in one fell stroke yet did not solve anything.
     
  11. TIGR

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,184 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,030
    Location:
    Minnesota, USA
    motasim, I'm unclear on one thing: do you already own the computer listed in your "System Specs," or is that the fantasy machine you want to build? Obviously, if you already own all that, you can add a video card for less than the cost of a PS3 that will make the computer a significantly more powerful gaming machine than a PS3.

    But as for the gaming rig: $2200 is a lot more than you need to spend for PS3-destroying gaming performance. You could save a lot of money changing your choices in case, CPU, motherboard, PSU, and RAM, and build a rig that would perform within a few percent of the speculated build's capabilities with components that cost less than half as much—consider an AM3-based rig built with at least some used parts sold on forums like TPU.
     
  12. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,418 (6.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,495
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    How was nothing solved with that advice? Explain.
     
  13. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,282 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Location:
    Home
    Well, if he can/want to take that route, he would have done that by now, so obviously, he can't/don't want to. Its good to own both (I have access to both) but if OP can't then the advice did nothing. Hope you understand what I am trying to say. Please do not see this as an insult/slander/etc, but rather me voicing my thoughts.
     
  14. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,418 (6.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,495
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    Nothing harsh seen,viewed or heard.:)


    I'm justthhinkin all this budget when in reality both can be had. If it had to be a choice, and my own, that's which route I would take. If its down to saving cash, id go ps3 only as the op already has a laptop.
     
  15. surfingerman

    surfingerman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    209 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    i think clearly the best solution is to go PC but only spend 1500$ and then use the extra 400$ to buy your wife periodic gifts so shell stop nagging you and you can get more play time, seems good no?
     
    Easy Rhino, motasim and TIGR say thanks.
  16. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    You are right, but in this case the advantage for the PC over the PS3 in graphics will be much reduced. Also, PS3 is capable of handling games at true 1080p, but only a few titles support that.
     
  17. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    brilliant idea ;)
     
  18. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    Wow :eek: that'll be sweet! I'll keep it in mind.
     
  19. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,591 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    970
    I have to say playing a 360 game on my monitor at 720p upscaled looks better than playing a pc game at 720 upscaled. I'd blame that on the 360 upscaler chip which is still one of the best on the market. I'd use it for dvds if it weren't so damn loud. I'm not sure how far behind the ps3's falls in comparison but it's probably still better than the pc upscaling.
     
  20. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    ... :laugh: ... I love your reply :roll: ... so I take it that this goes for every one who has a high-end PC gaming rig? and only PS3 owners have sizable manhood :rolleyes: gives me something to think about. By the way; I clearly stated that I'm working on a MicroATX build, so please Freud, give us you take on that :nutkick:
     
  21. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,547 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    847
    PS3 upscales beatufully too, I've had DVD's upscaled that end up looking better than certain blu ray's, also Unchated 2 looks like a freakin dream in 720p upscaled.

    definitely agree that just running a game in 1280x720 on a 1080p computer monitor just isn't the same...

    also motasim, you should multi quote people to reply in the same post rather than triple posting.
     
  22. Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,621 (1.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Australia
    both thats why ill be doing, GT5 here i come.....
     
  23. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    You're right, I don't want to get both. The same have been suggested earlier in the thread and I already replied to that.
     
  24. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,591 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    970
    You know I'm not even sure the upscaler in the ps3 is a chip, might just be software. In which case I'd imagine it could just keep getting better and better with each update.
     
  25. motasim

    motasim

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    205 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina
    You are right, sorry!

    No, I don't have that machine; I want to build it, and it's not much of a "fantasy machine" as I already have the funds set aside for it. I'm just waiting for two things; upcoming GPUs from both AMD/ATI & nVidia and a decent MicroATX gaming case, the latter not being much of a priority.

    I agree with you, as well as with other members who kindly participated in this thread; I can build a good gaming rig for less, and I'll be considering doing just that.

    As for PS3; I didn't start this thread as a console bashing thread at all. I just really needed to have this discussion with other PC gamers since I am loyal PC gamer unfortunately surrounded here by strictly console gaming friends who never played anything on a PC other than minesweeper and solitaire :banghead: and I needn't tell you that any argument with them is pointless.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2010

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page