1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Geekbench

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by lemonadesoda, Mar 18, 2009.

  1. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    Geekbench is a nifty benchmarking utility, focusing on math crunch and memory speeds. It is a CPU benchmark, not GPU. OK! Let's see your scores.

    Instructions
    1. Download Geekbench 2.1.x http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/2188/GeekBench_v2.1.4.html *Note 1
    2. Install and run the 32-bit test
    3. You can either 1) Use the "submit" button in geekbench, and then copy the hyperlink of the results to this thread (preferred), or alternatively post the screenshot of Summary and System information using TPUCapture!
    4. Post the <table> data as shown below, and remember to calculate the value in the last column GeekScore / Ghz, example = 4555 / 2.70 = 1687
    *Note 1. Geekbench is updated from time to time. I have found v2.1.x to identify my dual xeon system correctly as 2 processors, 8 cores total. But using the lastest GeekBench 2.4.x gives the WRONG CPU info, it says, 1 processor 8 cores, and also gives quite different results. So please download GeekBench v2.1.x from the link above.

    Name CPU (2x for dual) Speed MemoryType GeekScore Integer FP Memory StreamScore GeekScore/Ghz comment
    1
    2 lemonadesoda Q6600 2.7 Ghz DDR 400 4555 6348 5326 1670 1352 1687 AGP system, W2K3. ASROCK 775i65 v2.0
    3 lemonadesoda Atom 280 1.66 Ghz DDR2 911 932 778 1023 1085 549 Sony VAIO W
    4 lemonadesoda Atom 330 1.60 Ghz DDR2 667 1211 1403 1225 961 995 757 Shuttle X27D
    5 lemonadesoda Atom D525 1.80 Ghz DDR2 800 1444 1601 1392 1283 1401 802 Supermicro X7SPA-HF result
    6 lemonadesoda P4EE 3.2 Ghz DDR 400 1489 1595 1556 1290 1285 465 Done over RDP, quite a lot of overhead
    7 lemonadesoda 2x L5420 3.00 Ghz FB-DIMM 800 8511 12286 10566 1775 1586 2837 Single channel FB.DIMM
    8 lemonadesoda 2x E5420 2.50 Ghz FB-DIMM 667 7162 10313 8823 1570 1512 2865 DUAL Channel FB-DIMM
    9 lemonadesoda 2x E5420 2.50 Ghz FB-DIMM 667 7346 10439 8843 1996 1989 2938 QUAD Channel FB-DIMM
    10 lemonadesoda 2x E5472 3.00 GHz FB-DIMM 800 8712 12426 10540 2097 2549 2904 Workstation
    11 lemonadesoda i5-3210M 2.50 GHz DDR3 800 4960 4835 5612 4172 4693 1984 AsRock Vision HT 321B
    12
    13 alexp999 Q6600 3.6 GHz DDR2 1000 6262 8271 6987 2926 3369 1739 W7
    14 PSYCHoHoLiC i7 920 4.0 GHz DDR3 10365 11504 13079 5964 5687 2591 Vista
    15 PSYCHoHoLiC i7 920 3.6 Ghz DDR3 1098 7463 . . . . 2073
    16 Xternal E7200 3.16 Ghz DDR 800 3487 4549 3790 1981 1730 1103 Meh...Winxp
    17 A Cheese Danish AMD Opteron 170 2.95 GHz 4GB DDR400 3091 3251 4147 1677 1665 1048 Windows XP x64 running the x86 version of geekbench
    18 BiNGE Molly i7 i7 920 4.2 GHz DDR3 1600 11113 12182 13919 6305 7169 2646 Vista 64
    19 Slyfox2151 E7300 3.33 Ghz DDR2 800mhz 3686 4772 3975 2136 1978 1116 Vista / anti viri running
    20 DOM X3350 4GHz DDR2 1066 7061 9523 7869 3171 3404 1765 Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1
    21 btarunr X4 9750 2.40 GHz Ganged DDR2-1066 4372 4795 5536 2902 1765 1822 Linux x64
    22 Pete1burn 2x FX-70 2.6GHz 4gb DDR2 800 4247 4648 5993 1733 1765 1633
    23 HammerON E8500 3.16 GHz DDR2 1066 4607 5882 4905 2916 2489 1458 Vista 32bit
    24 DanTheBanjoman 2x L5310 2.4 GHz FB-DIMM-667 7039 9902 8509 1890 2173 2933 Should fix my memory
    25 DrPepper Q6600 3.8 Ghz DDR2-1138 6767 8985 7549 3126 3557 1760 Cake
    26 DrPepper Q6600 2.4 Ghz DDR2-800 4236 5560 4666 2063 2448 1765 Stock FSB 266
    27 DrPepper Q6600 2.7 Ghz DDR2-800 4732 6263 5247 2329 2378 1752 FSB 300
    28
    29 A Cheese Danish T9300 2.5 GHz DDR2 667 2767 3572 2949 1644 1564 1107 Windows 7 Ultimate
    30 A Cheese Danish Atom 270 1.6GHz DDR2 533 873 894 736 986 1063 546 Windows XP x86 SP3
    31 3870x2 T2600 2.16 GHZ DDR 667 2259 2700 2522 1375 1572 1046 My Work Laptop
    32 mlee49 Q9450 3.21 Ghz DDR2 1066 5762 7501 6226 3115 3346 1795 Vista x64
    33 angelkiller E8400 4.3GHz DDR2-956 4815 6120 5102 3405 2793 1119 no comment
    34 angelkiller E2180 3.0 GHz DDR2-600 3329 4240 3566 1986 1999 1110
    35 angelkiller T2500 2 GHz DDR2-667 2001 1380 3042 1553 1428 1000 Lenovo T60. Core Duo, not Core 2, 1GB of RAM.
    36 angelkiller Pentium D 945 3.4GHz DDR2-800 2266 2614 2179 1841 2209 667 commie? Windows 7
    37 angelkiller Athlon 3000 2.4GHz DDR-400 1852 1778 2242 1537 1379 813 commune?
    38 JrRacinFan E5200 3.33 Ghz DDR2 800 CL4 3631 4639 3873 2359 1806 1090 24/7 clocks
    39 FordGT90Concept 2x E5310 1.60 Ghz FBDIMM-667 4691 6240 5655 1459 1739 2932 TYAN__ D1808___
    40 hoss331 Q9650 4.34 Ghz DDR2 1157 7841 10418 8596 3845 4176 1807 Vista 64
    41 FordGT90Concept Core i7 920 2.77 GHz DDR3-1066 7245 7791 9095 4333 4686 2616 HT and Turbo on (2.66 GHz stock)
    42 chuck216 Athlon x2 5600+ 2.90 Ghz DDR2 667 3042 3130 3932 1962 1783 1049 Vista 64 with 32 bit geekbench
    43 wolf2009 Intel Q9450 3.20 GHz DDR2-800 5478 7417 6144 2367 2584 1712 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/136525
    44 MRCL Intel E6300 1.86 GHz DDR2-667 2175 2488 2167 1722 2022 1169 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/136528
    45 freakshow Core i7 920 4.1Ghz Gotta get back to on that one 10761 11833 13276 6530 6669 Vista x64 Ultimate
    46 r1rhyder i7 920 4.2 Ghz DDR3 2000 11177 12034 13565 6994 8189 2661 Windows 7
    47 chuck216 Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.50 Ghz DDR2 800 6368 7599 8547 2520 2136 1819 32 bit version
    48 rickss69 Core i7 965 4189.6MHz DDR3 11533 12710 14367 6595 7379 2759 Game rig
    49 jellyrole i7 920 D0 4Ghz 1600 Trident 10284 11659 12447 6017 6440 2571
    50 Fatal Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.70 Ghz DDR2 1066 6766 8005 8823 3022 2725 1828 32 bit version
    51 BarbaricSoul 2600k 4.20 Ghz DDR3 1600 12797 13242 1682 7976 9384 3046 2600k system in system specs
    52 MetalRacer i7 3930k 5.2GHz DDR3 2133 20767 23498 26279 9649 14153 3993 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/537533
    53 MetalRacer i7 3770k 4.8GHz DDR3 2133 15330 16261 18787 9850 10934 3193 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1319510
    54 Aquinus i7 3820 4.62 Ghz DDR3-2400 (10-12-11-33-1T) 13131 13827 15091 8923 12254 2842 128.6Mhz bclk
    55 chevy350 2600k 4.4GHz DDR3-1866 13228 13994 16661 7937 9120 4017 32bit 64 bit
    56 Melvis FX-57 2.8 GHz DDR 500 2144 2103 2657 1627 1529 763 Windows XP 32
    57 Melvis XP 2100 1.85Ghz DDR 266 1138 1195 1591 547 544 615 Going for Lowest Score
    58 Melvis AMD X2 4600+ 2.4GHz DDR500 2618 2667 3397 1677 1605 1091 Windows XP 32
    59 Melvis Phenom II X4 965 3.4 Ghz DDR3 1333 6317 7353 8291 2960 2501 1858 Windows 7 64
    60 Melvis AMD A8-5600k 3.8 Ghz DDR3 1333 6063 6427 7646 3884 3612 1596 Customers Comp
    61 Melvis A10-5800K 3.8/4.2 Ghz DDR3 1333 6697 7112 8712 3959 3671 1762 Customers Comp
    62 Arctucas i7 950 4273 MHz DDR3 1600 11207 12518 13688 6496 7366 2622 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1373607
    63 Melvis AMD FX 8350 4.0/4.2 Ghz DDR3 1600 9773 11312 12821 4304 4657 2443 Main Rig
    64 HammerON i7 970 4.0 GHz DDR 3 1066 13848 15684 18003 5612 9360 3462 Win7
    65 Compgeke Atom Z520 1.33 GHz DDR2 533 725 625 757 803 704 529 Dell mini 10
    66 de.das.dude AMD X4 945 3.0 GHz DDR2-1066 5255 6443 6958 2004 1642 1751.7 Win7 x64 result
    67 TRWOV Core i5-2320 3.5Ghz DDR3-1600 8407 8807 9119 7079 7176 2402 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1610900
    68 AphexDreamer FX6100 4530Mhz DDR3 1333 9916 10043 14350 4237 5314 2189 Main Rig http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1610983
    69 rickss69 980X 3.99GHz DDR3 1600 13691 15670 17432 5622 9797 3431 gamer
    70 phoen i7-3770K 4.80GHz DDR3-2400 14932 15914 17017 10100 13869 3110 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1612049
    71 TRWOV QX6800 3.19Ghz DDR400 5407 7464 6249 2155 1771 1694 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1614648
    72 rickss69 980X 4.3 GHz DDR3 15121 17961 18910 5949 10268 3484 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1619412
    73 rickss69 Atom N270 1.60 GHz DDR2 800 856 682 802 1021 500 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1620264
    74 Durvelle27 AMD FX 4100 4.6GHz DDR3 1333 7612 7471 10644 4231 4261 1655 Main Rig
    75 Melvis AMD E2-1800 1.7GHz DDR3 1333 1782 1731 2051 1442 1700 1048 Lenovo x131e
    76 phoen i7-3770K 4.90GHz DDR3-2400 15825 16287 19009 10237 14248 3229 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1629545
    77 uuuaaaaaa AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition 4013Mhz DDR3 1333 10100 12067 13646 4000 3011 2516 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1629839
    78 Melvis Intel Pentium D 945 3.4GHz DDR2 533 2271 2795 2210 1735 1724 668 http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=52337
    79 TrainingDummy AMD A8-3870 3.1GHz DDR3 1333 5894 6831 7575 3039 2444 Blah http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2273447
    80 MightyMission i5 2500k 5000mhz 2 x 4 GB Ripjaws X 2133 11788 12562 12978 9409 9680 2357.6 http://img.techpowerup.org/130826/GB2.jpg
    81 Compgeke Core i5 520M 2.4 GHz PC3-10600 3719 3995 4399 2542 2728 1549.48 Lenovo Thinkpad T410 http://goput.it/6c45.png
    82 Compgeke 2x E5405 2 GHz DDR2-667 FBDIMM 5943 8290 7087 1833 1945 2971.5
    83 HammerON i7 4770K 4.7 GHz DDR 3 2666 14752 15939 16718 9040 15145 3139
    84 Compgeke VIA CoreFusion "Luke" 1 GHz DDR-400 321 282 433 243 224 321 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/2348895
    85 Melvis AMD A10-7700K 3.4GHz DDR3 1600 6832 7452 9102 3555 3279 2009 New Customers Build


    ==============================================================================


    ========== WANTED =============================================================

    Would someone kindly run the following:

    Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper!

    Nehalem-EP
    Xeon E5400 systems Thanks Compgeke!

    Xeon E5500 systems
    Xeon E7 systems
    A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2.
    Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish!

    Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer
    Atom D2600/D2800
    Via Nano or C7
    AMD C-350 and C-450 APUs


    Favourite "multicore" benchmarks, Fritz, Geekbench, EVEREST PhotoWorxx
    (updated to post#177)
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2014
  2. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    [​IMG]

    alexp999 | Q6600 | 3.6 GHz | DDR2 1000 | 6262 | 8271 | 6987 | 2926 | 3369 | Not optimized
     
  3. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,896 (13.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,304
    When I run it, it says it's not a valid Win32 application. :ohwell:
     
  4. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    Is that the installer or the program?
     
  5. alexp999

    alexp999 Staff

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Messages:
    8,045 (3.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Dorset, UK
    I ran it fine on Win 7 x64
     
  6. Psychoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    517 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    it says 2.79ghz, but its really 3.8 with turbo so 3.99ghz

    [​IMG]
     
  7. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    Atom330:
    lemonadesoda | Atom 330 | 1.6 Ghz | DDR2 400 | 1211 | 1403 | 1225 | 961 | 995 | 757 | Shuttle X27D
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2009
  8. Psychoholic

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    517 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    did a 3.6ghz run with HT Turned off for a clock vs clock comparison with the q6600 for curiosity.


    PSYCHoHoLiC | i7 920 | 3.6 Ghz | DDR3 1098 |


    [​IMG]
     
  9. Xternal

    Xternal New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Puerto Rico
    [​IMG]
    Xternal | E7200 | 3.16 Ghz | DDR 800 | 3487 | 4549| 3790 | 1981 | 1730 | 1103 | Meh...Winxp
     
  10. A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,963 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    413
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    Could not load screen shot atm...:shadedshu
    A Cheese Danish | AMD Opteron 170 | 2.95 GHz | 4GB DDR400 | 3091 | 3251 | 4147 | 1677 | 1665 | 1048 | Windows XP x64 running the x86 version of geekbench
     
  11. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,752
    Location:
    PA, USA
    [​IMG]
    BiNGE Molly i7 | i7 920 | 4.2GHz | DDR3 1600 | 11113 | 12182 | 13919 | 6305 | 7169 | 2646 | Vista 64
     
  12. slyfox2151

    slyfox2151

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,611 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    525
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    [​IMG]



    Slyfox2151 | E7300 | 3.333mhz | DDR2 800mhz | 3686 | 4772 | 3975 | 2136 | 1978 | 1116 | Vista / anti viri running
     
  13. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    On ASUS DSEB:
    lemonadesoda | L5420 x2 | 3.0 Ghz | FB-DIMM 800 | 8511 | 12286 | 10566 | 1775 | 1586 | 2837 | Single channel FB.DIMM at the moment
     
  14. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    DOM | X3350 | 4GHz | DDR2 1066 | 7061 | 9523 | 7869 | 3171 | 3404 | 1765.25 | Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1
     
  15. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Why does Solaris get his own version?
    [​IMG]
     
  16. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    I guess someone just hasnt compiled the build yet. Not a lot of call for it, possibly?

    ****

    On another note, this benchmark is bringing my L/E5420 system to BSOD. I think it may be the northbridge/memory system. I can bench from cold boot up. But a warm machine BSODs. No problem with other benchmarks. Something I need to look into...

    Dan, kindly do an OC L5310 system.
     
  17. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    On ASUS P4P800-VM:
    lemonadesoda | P4EE | 3.2 Ghz | DDR 400 | 1489 | 1595 | 1556 | 1290 | 1285 | 465 | Done over RDP, quite a lot of overhead

    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/119814

    I find it amazing that an Atom 330 can keep up with a P4EE 3.2Ghz. While the P4EE will game better (faster performance for the single core), for productivity software that can multithread, the Atom 330 is a perfect, cheap, silent replacement for such machines. Quite simply, if you have ANY P4 machines in your office, they should be immediately retired. Their power consumption/performance ratios as well as noise means they should hit the scrap heap. A $100 Intel Atom 330 board and a $20 stick of DDR2 will outperform it. The only point against this upgrade is the loss of AGP video cards and using onboard video... which we can do due to double TFT setups. :-(
     
  18. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    [​IMG]
    Evil laptop.


    You have L5420's, nice, been wanting those due to the x7 multiplier. Though actually buying them for the slight increase would be a waste.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2009
  19. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    I've mixed a L5420 and E5420. Same 45nm and same stepping. I would have preferred 2xL5420 for power reasons... but I took what I could get at a great price. The E5420 has active cooling. The L5420 has passive, but gets "hit" with a little airflow from the E5420 fan.

    BSEL mod. FSB 1600.

    I'm having stability troubles at the moment. I think it is the Northbridge/FB-DIMM. I hope this and not a issue with mixing CPUs. Stable when cold. Unstable when warm... therefore I suspect Northbrdge/FB-DIMM.
     
  20. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    I have two HR-01 X's on my CPU's, single 120mm fan on them. BSEL to 1600 as well, can overclock further but have been lazy. I sShould raise voltage by a lot and see how far they go. Memory shouldn't be a real issue, two of my modules are 667Mhz forcing my memory to 667. I know they can do 780 at least. (they did on my X7) And my other two modules are 800 stock so should do 780 as well, even with the lower timings.
     
  21. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    I have those too. But the Thermalright HR-01 X are a complete pain. Had I realised how their fixing mechanism for s771 worked, then I would have bought the Noctuas. The HR-01 X's are a disaster for mounting/unmounting due to the location of their bolting mechanism on s771. It takes forever and twisted fingers and a risk of slipped screwdrivers or spanners to install and remove. When you see how easy an Intel stock cooler or the Noctuas are to install... they are worth $20 more just for the time they save.

    The Thermalright HR-01 is OK on s775 however. But absolutely cannot recommend them for s771 though!
     
  22. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    I completely agree, they are a hell to install/remove. I actually made that comment on XS a few days ago. Though in the end it's performance that matters, it's not like I should be removing them every other day.
    Also, they'd fit better on certain boards, being able to rotate them 90 degrees makes them nice. It's a shame few boards will allow that.
     
  23. Marineborn

    Marineborn New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,144 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    312
    that bench told me im pretty much a noob, BAH at it
     
  24. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,864 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,716
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    At 2.40 GHz: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/claim/?&id=119922&key=589338

    btarunr | X4 9750 | 2.40 GHz | Ganged DDR2-1066 | 4372 | 4795 | 5536 | 2902 | 1765 | 1821.66 | Linux x64

    I disabled Cool'n'Quiet and C1E from the BIOS. When enabled, Linux keeps playing with the CPU speeds on a per-core basis. It is likely that Core 0 clock speed was 1.20 GHz in my previous run, which is why the result looked funny. Count this:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2009
  25. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,267 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    That's more like it! I was thinking the Phenom had passed out.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page