Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by lemonadesoda, Mar 18, 2009.
Pete1burn | 2xFX-70 | 2.6GHz | 4gb DDR2 800 | 4247 | 4648 | 5993| 1733 | 1765 | 1633
Did you post an image? There's nothing there for you.
No....I think he was actually talking smack to you......go get him.
On topic....I'll pick this up and give it a few runs.
Here is my lame score
Very upset with such a low score~~~~
HammerON | E8500 | 3.16 GHz | DDR2 1066 | 4607 | 5882 | 4905 | 2916 | 2489 | 1458 | Vista 32bit
Bah! I can't get my Xeon system to do this benchmrk without BSOD. Still hunting down the problem!
FAULTY L5420 it seems
full specs in sig.... <-------
im go try it
DanTheBanjoman | 2x L5310 | 2400MHz | FB-DIMM 667 MHz | 7039 | 9902 | 8509 | 1890 | 2173 | Can't find? | Should fix my memory
I took out the 667Mhz memory so it runs at dual channel 800, increases my score to 7081, quite pointless.
heh I was obsessing about 66mhz on my ram seems like it wouldn't make a difference anyway.
DrPepper | Q6600 | 3843MHZ | DDR2-1138 | 6767 | 8985 | 7549 | 3126 | 3557 | 1760 | Cake
When your system is severely bottlenecked by memory it does make a difference. Just need two 2GB 800MHz modules to replace the 667's, don't feel like wasting cash on them though
I was referring to myself though I still can't beat your bloody score I've managed to get it at 4ghz and still 21 points behind.
========== WANTED =============================================================
Would someone kindly run the following:
Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper!
A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2.
Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish!
Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer
Via Nano or C7[/COLOR]
I'l give it a go mr soda I was about to compare 2.4 to 4ghz so I've already got the results for 2.4
Melvis | FX-57 | 2.8 GHz | DDR 500 | 2144 | 2103 | 2657 | 1627 | 1529 | 763 | Windows XP 32
A Cheese Danish | T9300 | 2.5 GHz | DDR2 667 | 2767 | 3572 | 2949 | 1644 | 1564 | 1107 | Windows 7 Ultimate
Atom 270 posted.
And will have Ubuntu and Fedora up for my lappy by tonight as well.
Heres my work laptop:
3870x2 | T2600 | 2.16GHZ | DDR 667 | 2259 | 2700 | 2522 | 1375| 1572 | 1045.83333333333333333333333 | My Work Laptop
when I get home ill test my home machine.
That is very low for a T9300, my T2600 gets better than that. Might want to find the cause?
That score is pretty good for 0 MHZ ram!
Yeah, i just got up to 2164...i may do a clean install of 7 and see whats up. Then I'll probably run XP as well
Problem right there. Check CPU-Z and BIOS.
Ima edit it now. The multicore setting was disabled for some reason...
thats pretty good for 1 core, says alot for the T9300.
Lenovo IdeaPad S10
A Cheese Danish | Atom 270 | 1.6GHz | DDR2 533 | 873 | 894 | 736 | 986 | 1063 | 546 | Windows XP x86 SP3
^^nice. Dual channel DDR running on that Atom 270, right?! (Compare to my Atom 330 in the OP, which is single channel DDR2 667).
Notice that clock-for-clock the Atom 270/330 is pwning a P4 EE edition. That means that if/when they create an "Extreme" Atom 330 with just 10W, it will do very nicely. Larrabee is going to be ace. Even as a "server" processor:
e.g. Atom 330 "extreme" at 3Ghz and 10W = 2500 geekscore
"8" of these on one chip = 80W = 20000 geekscore
Compared with dual Xeons = 150W = 12500 geekscore
Twice the performance, half the power.
Separate names with a comma.