1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Marketing and Prejudice Get the Better of Consumers with PC Processors: Test

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jan 24, 2012.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,632 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,363
    that. but at least it gets them some good pr unlike the bulldozer team. fire all engineers and hire more pr people?
    HumanSmoke and Andrei23 say thanks.
  2. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,435 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    3 monitors? At that resolution both setups were GPU limited so there really wasn't a difference.
  3. Rowsol

    Rowsol

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    566 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    AMD has a much better integrated graphics. It's common knowledge. It's no surprise that without a graphics card the intel is going to suck. And as for the triple monitor test that's lol worthy. The cpu isn't even a factor. With that said the A8 does have some great budget build applications if you are okay with medium settings in games.
  4. cavemanthreeonesix

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    54 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    odd that seeing when i benched my 2600k against my phenomII 965 it didnt beat it is any test until i started ramping the clocks up, apart from cpu tests like in 3d mark, 26k had a healthy lead in these from the start.

    For gaming I found the 26k to begin with quite dissappointing
  5. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,476 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,936
    i always say and will say it again, AMD systems just feel a lot faster or snappier than those of intel, and thus i will always get AMD ones.

    and this tests just prove my point.
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,384 (3.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,086
    And we keep telling you you are so wrong it's silly.
  7. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,892 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Exactly, that's why you have 100+ fps in GTA:SA while I only have 60 fps...because I have V-Sync on.
  8. Kaynar

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    161
    Seriously, HOW can they expect and i3 to perform in gaming? They wanted to play pacman with it?
    ensabrenoir says thanks.
  9. Jarman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    388 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Location:
    Wrexham UK
    how hard would it really be to skew the high end test by using a beta driver or something for the 7970 on the 2500k? Or clock down the 2500k, or use low frequency ram etc, etc....or even overclock the bulldozer and use some nice 1800 ram.

    The tests seem very open to manipulation if you ask me
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  10. kajson

    kajson

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    144 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    The 8150 system also functions as roomheater, thus the gaming experience probs felt a lot cozier :twitch:slap:
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  11. General Lee New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    51 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Yeah, nice of AMD to show how you don't need an FX-8150 since the game is totally GPU bound. :D
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  12. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,124 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Alright, prove it. You did the benches right? So show me what every non-bias tech review site failed to.

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/102?vs=288
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i5-2500k-and-core-i7-2600k-review/1
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/Gaming-Left-4-Dead-2,2433.html

    But I'm sure all these people are lying. I don't want to derail the discussion, so pm me the results, and if they are valid I will no longer hold the idea that the i5-2500k is a better value.
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  13. Kaynar

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    161
    I will always believe that AMD is better value for money, but Intel and nVidia have the top performance high-end stuff, no matter what u do to try to proove me wrong :D
  14. digibucc

    digibucc

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    4,863 (2.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,465
    this thread is depressing
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  15. Mistral

    Mistral

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    397 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Location:
    Montreal
    It's quite simple, really.

    Systems are named A and B, with B being the AMD. People, left to their own devices, will tend to try system A first, B second.

    In the case of the "low end" PC, you have a clear gaming advantage on AMD's side.

    In the case of the "high end" gaming PC, you have a very comparable gaming experience, but the joy had on system B is fresher in the participants mind, hence why you see more selecting it as the "better" one.
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  16. Andrei23 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    243 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    See, to me it feels the exact opposite, therefore I must be right about my judgement, following your logic (or lack thereof) here.
  17. Andrei23 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    243 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    GTFO computer tech enthusiast forums then


    Bulldozer reminds me of this image

    [​IMG]

    For fanboys these are God's hands (Crapdozer analogy), for people who can think for themselves (people who base their judgements on results i.e. REALITY not marketing fluff and gut feelings) it's something completely different.
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2012
  18. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,309 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    544
    Location:
    AZ
    this and the first test the A8 is obviously a better choice for on-chip graphics.

    so biased testing sure, but still proves that experience is influenced by marketing and brand loyalty.
  19. suraswami

    suraswami

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    6,054 (1.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    790
    Location:
    Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
    There are 143 total votes for the basic system and only 141 for the high-end system. So there were 2 who had no idea what was happenning and left the tent? Or they got so dizzy with the awesome i3 frame rates and fainted?
  20. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,476 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,936
    i see a lot of intel fanbois here.
  21. coldtortilla New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    39 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    comparing the i3 with the A8 using integrated graphics is kinda unfair. They should both be using some lowend GPU. Then we'll see who has better preformance. :) (core i3 owner)
  22. Spectrobozo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    I remember some people complaining about HT causing some trouble, stuttering in some games, maybe they tested it with HT on in one of these games?
    because it doesn't make any sense, so you will probably need find another factor to explain,
  23. badmau5

    badmau5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    14 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    we will never know all details about this test cause its not even test, just another portion of marketing type of crap, the point is AMD vs Intel comparison organized by AMD is kind of hard to trust - unless you are hardcore AMD fanboy which is just silly, like any other fanboyism. It has been proved by numerous reviews already that bulldozer is significantly slower than sandy bridge chips, consumes more power and even somewhat slower than phenom II in many cases and every time someone tries to prove the opposite its just silly noise. AMD isnt bad company - they have amazing GPU's and lots of potential in general but bulldozer is a fail, and every "but our bulldozer feels a lot smoother!" type of statement is a fail as well.
    Andrei23 says thanks.
  24. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,476 (5.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,936
    the price of each build was the same ainnit?
    you dont get the point. AMD offers more for less. thas what they tried to say.
  25. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    843 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    66
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    :shadedshu

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page