Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by Laurijan, Sep 11, 2012.
one from me. Win8
You just need one core you can boot with 4 and pick which one is the fastest by setting it under the task manager
I wasn't laughing because I thought you weren't telling the truth, just from a few past reviewers on this website... They'll definitely let you know they're a reviewer.
Assholes are everywhere. Everybody has one and everybody can be one.
Being a reviewer doesn't give you forum rep unless your cadaveca ( No offense dave)
I wasn't going to drop any names, but yeah, he's definitely one of them, lol.
Of course we're not picking on you, Dave, just admiring all of the free sexy hardware you get
Here is mine.
Ha, as if it was free. Memory and motherboard came cheaply though, for sure. The rest I paid for with my wife's cashish.
Dunno I can get much better right now, might have to try the 3770K out. Which I also paid for.
My apologies then. I quit doing reviews recently BTW, It was too much of a burden
Checksum in superpi is missing - look at the pic in 1 post and then you see how i want it
You paid for one of the two 3770Ks you have...
Unless Intel made you send back the other?
What is the difference it completed?
I have no received any hardware from Intel....ever.
That means that every Intel CPU, I paid for. From P55 on, every Intel chip used for reviews here on TPU was bought with my own cash. As to AMD chips, AMD gave me A10-5800K, A8-5600K, and FX-8350. I'll be adding those scores here soon, once I get a chance to bench them again(probably this weekend).
A very kind company rep that shall remain nameless sent me my second 3770K chip, but it arrived after I had bought the first, since I had purchased the first since I had deadlines to keep.
Being a reviewer ain't all fun and games and free hardware. Honestly, as I've posted before, it's just a hobby I have a lot of time for.
If you actually knew how little.. yes little ...that I get out of doing reviews, financially, compared to the time I put in...it's really not worth it. However, I have nothing better to do. Next fall I go back to school, and until then, I'm basically stuck at home all day long, with a lot of time here and there to get stuff done. In the end though, I'm actually losing money a bit doing reviews, having to pick up other hardware. Doesn't matter to me though..I've got a lot out of this community, so it's my turn to give something back.
So running benches like this..is great. I can start a bench, come back 10-15 minutes later, or a couple of hours, take my screenshot, start the next...
Anyway, I think it might be nice to see what we could all get at the same clocks, and see who's got the best efficiency here in this bench.
That would be sweet.. perhaps in a different thread. Like limit the clock and memory speed to something reasonable for each CPU, and go from there. We do this as a benching team at OCF to knock off the rust for the tweaks on each benchmark.
There you go again covering up perfectly "wow" desktop backgrounds:shadedshu
Nice runs Metal
Funny I posted a thread similar to this though I ran all the tests and this was what I got for a response. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=173765
With all due respect, benchers care about 1M and 32M as its at hwbot, the rest... not. Not to mention it takes a while on slower machines too. Nobody wants to spend 30+ minutes to bench super pi for no reason (meaning nothing to compare it too). Also, you have no table for results so as its stands it would be a thread with results in posts... a bitch to compare and find anything. It was doomed from the start Im afraid. Perhaps make a table and people will come? Oherwise, dont pout.
Can't have a table with out some participation. Who is pouting? I am not. Perhaps you could leave out the insults till they are needed this is NOT the GN Forum.
You came to another competing thread(more or less) to report that nobody was playing in yours...my apologies if I read that wrong. Sure seemed like your were upset reading both threads. You took your ball and went home with telling the mods (instead of reporting it so they see it) to delete your thread in about 24 hours. Thats mad bro.
Anyhoo, posting a table up at the ready with your results to start shows something. It shows that the thread wont be a massive vomit of results impossible to sort through. That said, I will help you out this weekend and post up some results.
EDIT: Though with all the times in there, you may want to create a table for each result... man is will that be a pain to update!!
Yeah you read that wrong. All I am saying is that there are more than enough of these threads already as stated in the one I started. This is why there was no one participating.
Please do not bother.
another from me, getting better!
5Ghz will getcha in the 7 sec range
Inch by inch. I set 1.275V in BOIS, that's the most this chip has ever got.
I was more checking to see if the ram would handle it. does 2D fine ,but no 3D, maybe I need to tweak a bit.
Just picked up a new chip from MC.
I suppose with the addition of all these ~7.5s runs, I might as well post a score I've been sitting on for a while.
More to come
Separate names with a comma.