1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

No New GPUs from AMD for the Bulk of 2013

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Feb 10, 2013.

  1. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,263 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Firstly, as has been mentioned...it's WCCF :laugh:
    Secondly, seems strange that the Titan is being attributed the exact same clocks as the GTX 690
    Thirdly, online (r)etail have a history of gouging on price ( €700 for a HD 7970 for example)
    Fourthly, 512MB bus width? really? So Nvidia disabled two 64-bit controllers for a Tesla card where bandwidth is paramount, yet will enable them for a consumer card that likely would benefit less from the increased bandwidth in gaming. OK.
    erocker says thanks.
  2. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,582 (13.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,978
    I wonder if we'll see a beefed up 7970? 7990 could be a name that works since AMD never officially released one. They did this before with the 4870->4890.
  3. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,263 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    Would seem likely. My earlier post was only partly facetious, and I'd assume that the 28nm process would become more refined as it matures. Wouldn't surprise if AMD gained some headroom with voltage from a revision, which would translate to either low power envelope, or more likely, more headroom for clocking- especially if AMD implement a form of dynamic boost to take full advantage of the hardware (both low-power states and Powertune +20 for example).

    Not sure about the HD 7990 nomenclature though. If AMD are rebranding the HD 7970 to HD 8970 (OEM), then maybe HD 8990 might be an option, with HD 8980 for a similarly revised HD 7950.
  4. atikkur

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    45 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jakarta
    i'm waiting for kepler refresh with 384memory bus width and other hardware optimizations for lower or the same price. as ussualy nvidia refreshes, better performance and lower price. i'm holding back this gen for hardware refreshes or new architecture.
  5. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Too bad, was hoping AMD would respond to titan, and cause a price war.
  6. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,338 (3.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,477
    How much more could amd buff a 7970 without being obscene? If they make a card with 300tpd compared with the 7970's 250, it could not be that much of a buff even with refinements. Could it?
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. Rahmat Sofyan

    Rahmat Sofyan

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    94 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
    AMD don't care about the Titan, because they've owned PS4 and XBOX 720 project.

    and for that reason, nVidia moaning and this is the result geforce Titan...hahaha just happy as regular user, new product price war whatever...

    AMD may said, we are Spartan!!!
    Lionheart says thanks.
  8. Mr. Fox New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
  9. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,338 (3.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,477
    4% in favor of the 680 if useing the non ghz 7970... still a 7970. 4% is practically nothing.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (4.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    AMD must be mad not to compete with NVIDIA's Titan. :shadedshu Graphics cards are the one area where they remain competitive and profitable, so why are they throwing this advantage away?

    At this rate I can see AMD disappearing within 5 years or so.
  11. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,897 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    I think this is good...Take the time to make a decent card that plays all these ports even better...LOL

    I am actually happy with this decision by AMD...nothing like buying a $300 high~end video card to watch a mid level card come out 6 months later that dominates it with a $200 price tag...

    Personally I'd like to see an 18-24 month cycle with better improvements with drivers then see yearly product line releases with the older lines being abandoned before their drivers are mature.
  12. Mr. Fox New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    I agree, and the additional features, not to mention better driver support, with NVIDIA more than make up for that. In the mobile segment, 680M pretty much owns 7970M in everything other than compute function.
  13. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,338 (3.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,477
    Why I got a 7970
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. Mr. Fox New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    I went through 4 7970M and had too many functionality problems with them. The AMD mobile GPU is not nearly as good and stable a product as the desktop 7970. Finally got fed up and traded them for a pair of GTX 680M and couldn't be happier. Although, I do wish they had the same compute performance that Fermi did, I don't really need that for the way I use my system (exclusively gaming and overclocked benching).

    I agree with some of the thoughts here about having the latest and greatest rendered obsolete and getting more mileage out of having the current best that red and green have to offer. But, I kind of hate to see either one of them slacking off the pursuit of more performance. Having the two companies constantly pushing and trying to outdo one another is really a great thing for consumers regardless of brand preference.
  15. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    636
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    These guys are so uncertain of what they are going to be doing.
    Will be releasing 8xxx series Q2...then Q4....oh hold on lets make it next year.

    What I think they should be working on is their console side and the drivers for their PC side.
  16. Mr. Fox New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    United States
    AMD making consistently excellent drivers over the course of this year would be a better use of their time than making a new GPU. The 13.X Catalysts are a major improvement over the previous, but it took them way too long to release good quality drivers for the 7XXX series.
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
    Widjaja says thanks.
  17. 15th Warlock

    15th Warlock

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,699 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    960
    Location:
    Visalia, CA
    What I think is, as mentioned by others, AMD will finally release the official 7990, which in theory would still be fast enough to beat a single Titan card, they can price it close to what nVidia will charge for Titan and still proclaim to have the fastest card available.

    Crossfire scaling, in games that are properly supported by the driver, is close to 90%, and seeing the prices of 7970 cards lately, AMD could afford to price this card very competitively and still make a good profit.

    This card would carry AMD through the rest of 2013 and allow them enough R&D time to effectively counter whatever the green team releases after Kepler.
  18. tastegw

    tastegw

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    312 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    141
    prolly cause if the titan was a dual gpu card featuring 2 of the telsa chips, 85-115% performance of the 690 would be a joke on the low side.

    why go through all that trouble with a dual gpu card from the pro cards when you can just slap 2 of the the 600 series together like the 690

    im sure it would be much easier and cheaper to slap two 660ti's together than it would be 2 K20 chips.
  19. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,129 (1.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    The 690 was hardly slapped together. Nvidia actually put quite a bit of work into engineering that thing to be a beautiful well crafted card.
  20. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,203 (2.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    286
    Consoles won. RIP PC...
  21. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    498 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    This is why I said it's a "somewhat interesting" update... it's worth a read but I never meant to suggest more than that.
  22. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,582 (13.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,978
    Wait... Who said they weren't? Titan is not the 7XX series afaik.
  23. GC_PaNzerFIN

    GC_PaNzerFIN

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    505 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    469
    Location:
    Finland
    It is codenamed to be different gen than GK104. Unless you are claiming they will never release anything else but the top model with that chip and throw away all not too well working chips I can't see how this would be any different. Sure, price is this time higher but well competition has moved to play with consoles so...
  24. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,582 (13.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,978
    It's one card. :ohwell:
  25. GC_PaNzerFIN

    GC_PaNzerFIN

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    505 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    469
    Location:
    Finland
    I can guarantee you there will be like a ton of not-good-enough-for-Titan GK110s. Its massive chip with poor yields ;)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page