1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung, Apple... and YOU

Discussion in 'Science & Technology' started by Sasqui, Aug 22, 2012.

  1. catnipkiller

    catnipkiller

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Messages:
    1,493 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    canada
    Apple is a joke of a company that only hipsters and children use. I hope they get sued by everyone.
     
    TRIPTEX_CAN, Super XP and _JP_ say thanks.
  2. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,768 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    yes and no imo. We wouldn't have the phones we have today if the iPhone never existed. Apple haven't been that triggerhappy about things afaik, only about Samsung and alleged infringement (which i agree with in some ways). Is the system broken? Yes, but i dont want to hold apple guilty of using the system pretty much everyone uses.

    And its interesting how apple gets more hate because of this than actual copyrirght trolls.
     
  3. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,257 (5.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,597
    Location:
    Florida
    but apple is the copyright troll they have been systematically going after everyone.
     
  4. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,768 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    You have more info?
     
  5. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,257 (5.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,597
    Location:
    Florida
    Sasqui and Frick say thanks.
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,768 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    The only ones about copyright they initiated are Samsung and HTC. Didn't happen anything in the HTC case. There are a few where Apple are being sued though.
     
  7. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,601 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    let the good times roll
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_...-apple-if-lte-device-is-released-report-says/
    http://www.appleinsider.com/article...y_note_to_amended_galaxy_nexus_complaint.html
    expect more of this from now on.

    samsung should not have threatened apple by saying they would block the LTE on the next iphone(which they can't do), now it seems apple is going to sue them again, it never ends:shadedshu
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2012
  8. Drone

    Drone

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,723 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,416
    Poor Samsung, $1.05 billion is a helluva big prize for that and even that didn't make Apple happy. They has filed a fresh patent infringement action :rolleyes: It's moronic. Apple products have Samsung parts. I bet if Samsung rebels Apple will fall.
     
  9. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,732 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,636
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Apple will find another supplier if Samsung cuts ties. They maybe already did for the iPhone 5 which is launching soon.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,946 (2.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,212
    Copy-pasta from somewhere else:

     
    NHKS, Guitarrassdeamor, _JP_ and 2 others say thanks.
  11. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,732 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,636
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Yeah, it's disgusting that nothing "tech" matters unless it appears in the same sentence as "Apple." People ought to know better.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. Iceni

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    430 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    Location:
    coventry UK
    what gets me is the patents infringed seem to be whimsical at best.

    Had apple gone after samsung for manufacturing and assembly methods, then i could see that patent holding water.

    Only apple use a milled housing with a glued on screen. It's an apple design feature, and it's also an ascetic one as well since it minimises lines on the rear of the device.

    However all samsung devices are assembled in the normal fashion Screen first back last. Meaning more lines, removable back panels ect.


    The USA courts have just proven what a mess their legal system is. Allowing a minimalist patent to hold water just sets the flood gates open for larger companies to patent a mish mash of concepts based on nothing other than ideas. What happens now when apple patents all rectangles of all sizes with a glass fronted screen and for multiple different tasks.

    Here's a minimalist infra red box. (all touch screen TV remote's are gone)
    Here's a minimalist screen with a GPS capability. (all GPS/sat navs are gone)


    What upsets me the most however is a lot of countries have thrown out the apple/samsung debate, The USA failing to do this has probably stunted the market. Now small companies are going to be wary of Android, and it's similarities to apple. And without the financial grunt of samsung those companies are left without a defence if apple wants to intervene.


    Hopefully samsung has secured the patents on those fold-able amolded screens, and plans to implement them without allowing apple to benefit. But also licences the technology to everyone else. That would just be pudding ATM.

    http://www.applebitch.com
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2012
  13. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,936 (3.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,375
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    yeah, thats pretty sick. big company just sue other company again and again and again coz they say the other competitors copy their patent. why dont apple sue other company that make stuff like their product 100%? :mad:
    like this [​IMG]
     
  14. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,601 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    suing those tiny chinese clone companies is much much harder than suing a larger company like samsung

    why go through the trouble when you have patent mines everywhere.
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2012
  15. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,601 (2.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    You guys didn't think it was over did you . . . . . .:pimp:

    I like to keep up with the news and I must say . . . . . . If I saw the nonsense unfolding in a movie I would be like ". . . . . . ummm . . . . . no."

    Hogan the foreman was sued by Seagate in 1993 but The lawyer who sued Hogan on behalf of Seagate back in 1993 is now married to a partner at Quinn Emanuel, the lawyers for Samsung, this resulted in hogan becoming bankrupt and nearly ruined him.

    So Either Samsungs lawyers did not do their job or they knew it
    Or Apples lawyers are did not do their job

    http://www.groklaw.net/pdf4/ApplevSamsung-2013.pdf

    The Preliminary Injunction on the Galaxy Tab has also now been dissolved by the judge
     
  16. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,929 (4.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,616
    beyond that Samsung probably have made their displays incompatible with Apple computers too along with the no name parts they make under a different label (every company has one)

    Honestly Apple can go fuck themselves with their own apple
     
    TRIPTEX_CAN and Super XP say thanks.
  17. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,764 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    AMEN to that. :toast:
     
  18. HossHuge

    HossHuge

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,047 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    EDM, AB, CAN

    It seems I was on to something.....:rolleyes:

    So, I guess it sounded strange to Samsung as well.

    source
     
  19. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,717 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,457
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Didn't know this thread was still alive...

    Most of them are retaliatory, like kids in a sandbox "He started it!" And Apple did start it, they are pure evil incarnate.

    Most often, large companies use patents as a defensive mechanism. Apple obviously went on the offensive, and the rest are being both offensive and defensive in response.
     
  20. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,550 (2.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    I can not for the life of me find the thread where it was discussed where Apple lost the litigation in the UK and was forced to post an apology.
    This is the apology:
     
  21. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,528 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    That's no apology. It's a slap in the face.
     
  22. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,929 (4.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,616
    yup and guess what happens to Apple, certain ICs etc being made by samsung will no longer be in apple products.
     
  23. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,946 (2.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,212
    Apple's Samsung statement reprimanded by court of appeal
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/nov/01/apple-samsung-statement
     
  24. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,550 (2.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    Nothing like a slap in the face to Apple.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page