• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Super Computer!!??

i'm running huge programs like AutoCAD 2009, World of Warcraft, crysis, and tons of other home designing programs.

Have a look at workstation layout at My dream computer, though I'd wait a bit for dual-processor system (seem to come out in 2-3 months). The chipset will be the same (or nearly the same). You would not need more than 8 cores (really most Windows software cannot use even two).

Two-core system will also allow bigger (ECC!) memory per processor and will allow creating ram-drive (quite helpful for ACAD) - 4GB DDR3 ECC already exist.
 
Well everyone else on the thread was saying it was a stupid idea, lol. and that it wouldn't work.

well people give their opinions but you dont need to listen everyone will tell you intel everyone will tell you i7 or core2 but if i read your post right you want this right? so go for it w/e its your system. people wanted my to get 4870X2's but i didnt listen i like nvidia atm
 
yes it does work, but its a waste of money
 
yes it does work, but its a waste of money

im sorry he asked tyan or supermicro not what you thought of his spending habits go play with your i7 before you start to troll.

here is a list of procs that will work with that board

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340727%2050001028%201652741693&bop=And&Order=PRICE

and the ram

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010170541%201052121731%201052408745&name=DDR2%20667%20%28PC2%205300%29
 
That particular board might not be for sale yet. I can't find any prices on it. They all just say that it is coming out Q1 2009. I suspect it would cost well over $1000 USD and it doesn't look like an ATX Extended board either... too tall. It is probably a CEB something or other board. As such, I'm not aware of any cases that can fit it...
 
That particular board might not be for sale yet. I can't find any prices on it. They all just say that it is coming out Q1 2009. I suspect it would cost well over $1000 USD and it doesn't look like an ATX Extended board either... too tall. It is probably a CEB something or other board. As such, I'm not aware of any cases that can fit it...

maybe a super tower?
 
some where in 2009

2009 q 1 Nehalem-EP (Gainestown) 4 (8) cores LGA-1366

2009 q3/q4 Nehalem-EX (Beckton) MP server 8 (16) coresLGA-1567
 
I could probably make it work in mine, its pretty big already. I could just put the power supply outside.

just make sure you put some type of feet on it.
 
I should bring this up now because it could have a major impact on your decision. "Workstation" operating systems (Windows XP/Windows Vista) are limited to two sockets. If you want more than two sockets, you'll have to get Windows Server 2003 (Standard Edition or better) or Windows Server 2008 (any edition).

Except Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition, Windows Server does not have 3D graphic support. That is, you can't even install a FireGL or Quadro (it'll be running off of default Microsoft display drivers). Because AutoCAD is a priority for you, bigger is not better.

If you're thinking Linux or some other OS then don't mind me.


Windows Server Standard usually goes for around $700 USD w/ 5 CAL packaged as OEM. Vista/XP obviously go for much less.
 
Last edited:
i just want to give my opinion on this subject.

first off, i have no experience with server or workstation hardware. all i've ever dealt with are desktops and laptops.

with my desktop, i've done all the things you plan to do with your supercomputer, on a lowly q6600. never had it slow down, or even max all 4 cores at 100% usage.

if you just want to spend money on the best/fastest. build normal with desktop hardware. just buy the top of the line every thing. get 3 gtx280x2's(if ever released) an extreme edition cpu, the best ram and motherboard.

unless you have an actual need for server/industry class hardware your just wasting money to grow a bigger e-penis. i can almost guarantee a top end core i7 rig would pwn it in any game or normal usage.

i dont want to rant or belittle you, you've already gotten enough of that. but i think what your asking for is just not realistic.
 
I use this for my AutoCAD needs, very powerful:
hamster-wheel-race.jpg
 
I'm gonna give my input here:

I always have music running, along with Firefox, and files constantly being downloaded while playing L4D. My poor little AMD Athlon 3800+ single core (OC'd to 2.7ghz) runs all those things AT ONCE just fine. How would you need anymore power than that? 4 monitors is different, but I do have 2 running, and my single core processor handles all the things at one adequately. If you got a quad core you would be MORE THAN HAPPY. Don't waste money on a "super computer" that will be super until 1 month later and octal core processors are released or some shit like that. Don't fail it, just go i7 like all the wise people above have said. (mainly dan).
 
We all respect danthebanjoman not because he is the Señor Moderator, but because he is knowledgeable. You would do well to listen to what he has to say no matter how blunt. I guarantee you, with less cost, the i7 965 will outperform any dream you have of running a "supercomputer".
However if you are serious, and i indeed have no idea what im talking about, please feel free to go to http://www.nvidia.com/tesla.
EDIT: BTW welcome to TPU. we are of course glad to have you.
 
omg how mutch did that cost?

$4 at petsmart.
Then another $250 for the rotary-to-electric power converter.
produces 1 milliwatt per hour, very efficient.
 
Back
Top