Nvidia Pascal - GT / GTX10xx Owners Club [With Poll

[newconroer]

For now as i have said before my card is OC'ed at 2126MHz with power limit at 100%, tonight i will try to push it a little bit more.

Is it holding 2126mhz 95% of the time under load, or is it dropping down? I'd be super impressed if you were at that speed consistently, and not hitting the TDP limit.

I can hit 2175mhz boosted and run tests, but there's no way it's staying at 2175mhz.

 

[GreiverBlade]

Oh LOL, didn't read that, I only looked at the picture...
Too bad it's not metal, would make it a little more exlusive.
Expensive than for a piece of plastic though...
But still, looks nice

well they are custom made so ... i think for having the work done, it's ok for me, plus they also have it in white with black logo and text, in case i want to push more on the white accent of the Armor cooler and decide to seek a white mobo

 

[FireFox]

not 2126mhz, what is your "real" base clock outside of boost i'd like to know,

1860MHz

Is it holding 2126mhz 95% of the time under load, or is it dropping down? I'd be super impressed if you were at that speed consistently, and not hitting the TDP limit.

That's right 2126MHz without dropping down.

 

[P4-630]

1860MHz


That's right 2126MHz without dropping down.

View attachment 80174

Let it run some benchmark, like heaven or valley and make a screenshot of the GPU-Z graphs, then you can see if it's running at that speed all the time during the benchmark run.

 

[FireFox]

Let it run some benchmark, like heaven or valley and make a screenshot of the GPU-Z graphs, then you can see if it's running at that speed all the time during the benchmark run.

Tonight after work i will.

Don't try this at home

Joke

 

[GreiverBlade]

1860MHz


That's right 2126MHz without dropping down.

View attachment 80174

WHAT?!!?? ... i do 2100/2088 with 1706 (1070) and a 1080 need 1860 to do 2126? it feels weird...

Let it run some benchmark, like heaven or valley and make a screenshot of the GPU-Z graphs, then you can see if it's running at that speed all the time during the benchmark run.

technically it can drop in benchies but not in games for instance i get 2088 in Heaven but it run 2100 in ROTTR, oh well we should list : [base clock/average boost/max boost] when we put the core clock... suggestion

 

[FireFox]

WHAT?!!?? ... i do 2100/2088 with 1706 (1070) and a 1080 need 1860 to do 2126? it feels weird...

Sorry but i guess that i didn't understand your question, it happens when i am at work and have to run from one airplane to another
Btw, back on topic.
Your question was, my stock speed without boost, or my OC speed without boost?

technically it can drop in benchies but not in games

+1

 

[GreiverBlade]

Sorry but i guess that i didn't understand your question, it happens when i am at work and have to run from one airplane to another
Btw, back on topic.
Your question was, my stock speed without boost, or my OC speed without boost?


+1

nono you did understand well, i was just surprised that a 1080 need a 1860mhz base clock to reach a 2126 boost (stable) while my 1070 only need 1706 to reach 2088 (stable 2100 max)...
i understand better now, why the 1070 is a better value over a 1080 albeit being GDDR5 only (not that GDDR5X give tremendously better result over the previous gen ... and if Nv launch the 1080Ti with GDDR5 and not X ... i guess it would mean they had some issues with it )

"base clock" = OC or not ... aka GPU Clock on the 1st tab in GPU-Z so ... yep you did understand well

 

[FireFox]

nono you did understand well, i was just surprised that a 1080 need a 1860mhz base clock to reach a 2126 boost (stable) while my 1070 only need 1706 to reach 2088 (stable 2100 max)...
i understand better now, why the 1070 is a better value over a 1080 albeit being GDDR5 only (not that GDDR5X give tremendously better result over the previous gen ... and if Nv launch the 1080Ti with GDDR5 and not X ... i guess it would mean they had some issues with it )

"base clock" = OC or not ... aka GPU Clock on the 1st tab in GPU-Z so ... yep you did understand well

I was sure i didn't understand your question and so it's.

My base Clock it's 1721MHZ

 

[GreiverBlade]

I was sure i didn't understand your question and so it's.

My base Clock it's 1721MHZ

that's the base factory OC of the card then 1721, base manual OC is/was indeed 1860 ... you did read/understand it correctly at 1st, because i asked what clock you needed to reach 2126mhz max boost (otherwise i would have wrote "default Clock" in GPU-Z 1st tab )

stating max boost is wrong (at last for me ) i.e.: if i say core 1706/2088/2100 (manual OC) or 1556/1979/1984 (at stock factory OC) formatted as [base clock/average boost/max boost] it's more understandable.... i think

 

[FireFox]

that's the base factory OC of the card then 1721, base manual OC is/was indeed 1860 ... you did read/understand it correctly at 1st, because i asked what clock you needed to reach 2126mhz max boost (otherwise i would have wrote "default Clock" in GPU-Z 1st tab )

stating max boost is wrong (at last for me ) i.e.: if i say core 1706/2088/2100 (manual OC) or 1556/1979/1984 (at stock factory OC) formatted as [base clock/average boost/max boost] it's more understandable.... i think

I got your point.

What's your Base clock?

 

[GreiverBlade]

I got your point.

What's your Base clock?

i left it at stock factory OC of 1556/1979/1984 that's already plenty

 

[FireFox]

i left it at stock factory OC of 1556/1979/1984 that's already plenty

I was thinking to run mine at stock, 1721/1987.

 

[P4-630]

I was thinking to run mine at stock, 1721/1987.

I run it at stock speeds as well when gaming, I get my 60fps at 1080p in all games, so no need to OC for me.
I only OC when benchmarking which isn't that often.

 

[FireFox]

I run it at stock speeds as well when gaming, I get my 60fps at 1080p in all games, so no need to OC for me.
I only OC when benchmarking which isn't that often.

I get 88fps/90fps at 2560 x 1440 and that's more than enough, so, tonight after work i will set it back to stock.

 

[GreiverBlade]

I was thinking to run mine at stock, 1721/1987.
View attachment 80188

that's also plenty, specially for a 1080

I get 88fps/90fps at 2560 x 1440 and that's more than enough, so, tonight after work i will set it back to stock.

yep for 1440 it's golden ... (i think of getting a 27" 1440, i have a 27" 1080... at that moment i would slightly OC my card )

 

[FireFox]

i think of getting a 27" 1440, i have a 27"

I have an Asus Rog Gaming Monitor 27, i was thinking to replace it with an Asus
ROG Swift PG348Q Gaming Monitor,
34-inch Ultra-wide QHD (3440 x 1440) Curved Monitor.

But honestly i don't know if it's worth.

 

[P4-630]

I have an Asus Rog Gaming Monitor 27, i was thinking to replace it with an Asus
ROG Swift PG348Q Gaming Monitor,
34-inch Ultra-wide QHD (3440 x 1440) Curved Monitor.
But honestly i don't know if it's worth.

I may buy some cheaper 2560 x 1080 IPS or 2560 x 1440 IPS next year.
I can't afford ROG Swift and such

 

[Liviu Cojocaru]

I have an Asus Rog Gaming Monitor 27, i was thinking to replace it with an Asus
ROG Swift PG348Q Gaming Monitor,
34-inch Ultra-wide QHD (3440 x 1440) Curved Monitor.
View attachment 80193

But honestly i don't know if it's worth.

I don't think it does, I would say keep the 27 one for now and wait for the prices to come down for the 34 one.

 

[FireFox]

I don't think it does, I would say keep the 27 one for now and wait for the prices to come down for the 34 one.

That's a good advice

I can't afford ROG Swift and such

That's why i have two Jobs

 

[GreiverBlade]

I can't afford ROG Swift and such

so do i, so do i .... that's why i am eyeing at AOC's offers at my local etailer/retailer ... but i am far from pulling the trigger for now

1st: retaking a flightstick for Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen, thinking of a Speedlink Airrow since it's the OEM VKB Gladiator for EU (funny ... i am Swiss and Switzerland isn't part of the EU, well physically maybe but still) with some concession like a potentiometer twist axis instead of MaRS or no extra connector for pedal/throttle, although it has a throttle on the base, and use it with my Saitek Pro Gamer Command Unit (oldie but still goodie ) for extra buttons if needed (and using the analog stick of it for freeview)
2nd: well ... ARMOR BACKPLATE FTW!
3rd: ... errrr i don't know what ... but something interesting... probably

 

[P4-630]

so do i, so do i .... that's why i am eyeing at AOC's offers at my local etailer/retailer ... but i am far from pulling the trigger for now

1st: retaking a flightstick for Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen, thinking of a Speedlink Airrow since it's the OEM VKB Gladiator for EU (funny ... i am Swiss and Switzerland isn't part of the EU, well physically maybe but still) with some concession like a potentiometer twist axis instead of MaRS or no extra connector for pedal/throttle, although it has a throttle on the base, and use it with my Saitek Pro Gamer Command Unit (oldie but still goodie ) for extra buttons if needed (and using the analog stick of it for freeview)
2nd: well ... ARMOR BACKPLATE FTW!
3rd: ... errrr i don't know what ... but something interesting... probably

I was first thinking about upgrading my CPU next year (i7 6700k or the like),
but since I know now that if you have a larger resolution screen , more pixels means less work for the CPU right?

 

[FireFox]

I forgot to mention something yesterday.

Is it my Backplate Sexy enough

 

[FireFox]

.. i am Swiss and Switzerland isn't part of the EU,

We are neighbours

If you need something you can order it in Germany and i can send it to you

 

[P4-630]

I forgot to mention something yesterday.

Is it my Backplate Sexy enough
View attachment 80194

Nice card though, but I still prefer my own card's cooler design and it's color scheme..