Space Lynx
Astronaut
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
- Messages
- 16,020 (4.60/day)
- Location
- Kepler-186f
Processor | i5-12600kf @ 5.3 P and 3.9 E (1.28v) |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSi Z790 Pro Wifi |
Cooling | Frost Commander 140 |
Memory | 32gb (4x8gb) 3200 |
Video Card(s) | XFX MERC310 7900 XT (oc'd) |
Display(s) | NZXT Canvas 1440p 165hz 27" |
Case | NZXT H710 (Red/Black) |
Audio Device(s) | Jade Audio JT1, Asgard 2, Modi 3 |
Power Supply | Corsair RM850W Gold |
Mouse | Naga X |
Keyboard | Akko Fairy Switch |
Third person may be more engaging from a gameplay perspective, but if it is realism you want, then it must be 1st person.
You won’t get the option for third person combat in a real gunfight, with all its limitation on perspective etc. You’re going to see what you see in your field of view when it cones to life-threatening combat, no matter how many drones and advanced optics are on the the battlefield.
That's incorrect, if you look at the gear a lot of advanced soldiers use. I saw a video on it a couple years ago, guns with cameras that brings a camera feed to the soldiers helmet are actively being used in the military, etc. All they have to do is point the gun around a corner a little bit, no exposure, and get a 3rd person field video feed of everything to see what there next move will be. On the go, fast and tactical. Allowing for creation of new strategies on the fly.