• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3090 AMP Extreme Holo

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,986 (3.74/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The ZOTAC RTX 3090 AMP Extreme Holo is the longest graphics card we ever tested. At more than 350 mm long, this triple-fan, triple-slot monster has enough power to handle all the latest games at 4K resolution. The RTX 3090 GPU is highly overclocked, and the power limits have been raised, too.

Show full review
 
There is a size comparison mentioned on page 2:
See what I mean? The AMP Extreme Holo is huge, noticeably bigger than even the RTX 3090 FE. The two small cards on the left? Those are the RTX 3080 Founders Edition and Radeon RX 6800 XT—not so small at all.
However, I can't seem to find any such image?
 
It doesnt matter, if a 3090 as top of the top card doesnt fit in a case, than its to small case for 3090. Obviously but also practically as heat output is enormous.

Manufactures really need to stop with this garbage of making cards longer than necessary.
I am sure they just wanted reviewers to label it the longest card we ever tested.
 
There is a size comparison mentioned on page 2:

However, I can't seem to find any such image?
ahah i wrote the text and made a mental note to shoot that image, and forgot to add it, fixed now :)
 
Last edited:
Damn! That power usage is crazy. 448 watts gaming.
 
I'm curious to how the average FPS at 1080p chart shows the 6900xt faster than this card and the vanilla 3090, but the relative performance 1080p chart shows this card faster than the 6900xt.... Does that make sense. Granted, I didn't evaluate the math employed and whether certain outliers are excluded in calculating one or the other, so maybe this isn't an error... Maybe someone could explain it to me?

P.S. - I'm not trying to start a fight, I don't care which one is faster, just wondering why these two charts indicate two different outcomes
 
Does that make sense.
It's a slightly different calculation. Average FPS uses Geomean of the FPS scores. Relative Performance normalizes every game's FPS result first, so that the tested card is at "100", and then averages the results.
 
Have you got 3070ti evga ftw3 ultra maybe for testing? Sorry for offtopic.
 
Have you got 3070ti evga ftw3 ultra maybe for testing? Sorry for offtopic.
EVGA didn't sample this card, at least not to me
 
Last sentence in the review...

"doesn't have the 24GB VRAM either"

I'm not sure the arguement on 16GB versus 24GB is relevant really. Shader power becomes the bottleneck prior to VRAM.
 
Back
Top