• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AM5 + cheapest DDR5 = ?

Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
4,332 (4.93/day)
Location
Russian Wild West
System Name D.L.S.S. (Die Lekker Spoed Situasie)
Processor i5-12400F
Motherboard Gigabyte B760M DS3H
Cooling Laminar RM1
Memory 32 GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) RX 6700 XT (vandalised)
Storage Yes.
Display(s) MSi G2712
Case Matrexx 55 (slightly vandalised)
Audio Device(s) Yes.
Power Supply Thermaltake 1000 W
Mouse Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress...
Keyboard Makes some noise. Probably onto something.
VR HMD I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one.
Software Windows 11 / 10 / 8
Benchmark Scores My PC can run Crysis. Do I really need more than that?
Straight to the point. I got an upcoming AM5 build of MSI MAG B650M MORTAR WIFI with Ryzen 7600X. The point is my client who already ordered the CPU and the mobo is unexpectedly completely tight on money so he can't afford anything better than two cheapest 8 GB modules. He's fine with the fact he won't get sweet timings, optimal latencies etc, his (and mine) only concern is only will it actually work stable. None of the modules are listed as compatible on the vendor's page. And I am completely no expert in Zen 4 IMC behaviour.

Do we need to expect something worse than having to upper the voltage/lower the frequency?
 
Poor gaming performance is really the only downside. Ryzen 7000 is more memory sensitive especially with timings than Ryzen 5000 was and even that benefited from Bdie.
 
Just get whatever with SK Hynix chips and you'll be fine, as it should be quite tweakable.
I have XMP only RAM that is no QVL and it works great with XMP enabled.
 
It's basically the same as AM4, but FCLK is not tied to memory now. Keep it in 1:1 ratio. Stick to DDR5 5600-6000 lowest possible timings. If you are going to tweak it yourself, grab a cheap CL40 kit that is using SK Hynix ICs. Easy to get it to CL32-36-36-90 @ 1.4v without much effort.
 
Same here: no EXPO, no QVL, works fine.

Also, so what if performance is slightly impaired initially. Presumably the owner will at some point be able to upgrade the RAM and improve matters. Given the limited cost of a decent 32GB set of DDR5 I'd say that if that remains out of his financial bounds for long, then he's got worse problems than slightly sub-optimal performance in games.
 
Presumably the owner will at some point be able to upgrade the RAM and improve matters
Yeah, later this year. He just needs anything to actually run his PC tomorrow evening and he can't make scratch for 32 GB. Gaming is not intended, his only GPUs are a trio of GT 1030s.
It's basically the same as AM4
As if I knew how AMD IMCs actually work...
Keep it in 1:1 ratio. Stick to DDR5 5600-6000 lowest possible timings.
This is already known to me, Intel shares the same vibe with a little bit higher frequencies.
as it should be quite tweakable.
Unnecessary. My client doesn't care about RAM speed, his only concern is RAM amount. He doesn't work with anything RAM speed sensitive.

So as far as I gathered, we'll be fine since the only ACTUALLY important thing is making it to the OS and working without crashes, glitches and other unpleasant stuff. Low speed is fine. Thanks guys.
 
Get the cheapest 4800 kit you can find.
That was the original plan. I just wanted to know it doesn't have any flaws besides poor speed.
 
Unless it's actually faulty it'll work just fine. There are no out of the ordinary concerns with AM5 as long as you update to the latest BIOS/Agesa. Prior ones are not great as far as memory compatibility is concerned, although 4800 would have worked on any of them.
 
That was the original plan. I just wanted to know it doesn't have any flaws besides poor speed.
Besides the 24GB DIMMs, Micron, Samsung and Hynix work on the base launch BIOS.

Of course updating to the newest BIOS is recommended.
 
More RAM trumps faster RAM any day of the week - well, at least up to point.

That is, I would MUCH RATHER have 16GB of the slowest RAM than 8GB of the fastest.

When comparing slow 16GB RAM to fast 16GB RAM, the slow RAM will NOT offer "poor" performance. It just will not be as "good" as the fast. And it will still be significantly better than than 8GB.

I do hope, however, his budget allows for a SSD rather than a HD.
 
Back
Top