- Joined
- Feb 24, 2023
- Messages
- 2,307 (4.89/day)
- Location
- Russian Wild West
System Name | DLSS / YOLO-PC |
---|---|
Processor | i5-12400F / 10600KF |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B760M DS3H / Z490 Vision D |
Cooling | Laminar RM1 / Gammaxx 400 |
Memory | 32 GB DDR4-3200 / 16 GB DDR4-3333 |
Video Card(s) | RX 6700 XT / RX 480 8 GB |
Storage | A couple SSDs, m.2 NVMe included / 240 GB CX1 + 1 TB WD HDD |
Display(s) | Compit HA2704 / Viewsonic VX3276-MHD-2 |
Case | Matrexx 55 / Junkyard special |
Audio Device(s) | Want loud, use headphones. Want quiet, use satellites. |
Power Supply | Thermaltake 1000 W / FSP Epsilon 700 W / Corsair CX650M [backup] |
Mouse | Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress... |
Keyboard | Makes some noise. Probably onto something. |
VR HMD | I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one. |
Software | Windows 10 and 11 |
Errr... nope?the only drawback is lower RT perf.
• Multi-monitor power issues
• Borderline complete absence of CUDA equivalent
• Absence of DLSS
• XeSS works worse on AMD GPUs than it does on Ada and Arc (Ada gets as much as Arc, just for the record)
• FSR is miles behind and it's implemented outright badly in several games
• 20+ % worse power efficiency
• Worse power spikes
• No RTX 4090 competition whatsoever, even no plans on doing so
• Absurd reliance on Infinity Cache
And yeah, RT performance is not just lower. It's much lower. Yes, leather jacket guy is trying his hardest to make it "a performance blackbox with proprietary bollocks," no denial on that. Yet AMD are still playing it Bogart like they're not 3 generations behind in RT and supersampling but rather are a real PITA for nVidia, which is untrue. We have a lot of reasons to hate nVidia but AMD deserve all the hatred even more: they do not try to be better than nVidia. Just like in the meme, "Democratic party is worse than Republican only because it's not better."