• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Post your Final Fantasy XV Benchmark Results

FFXV 1080 5-26-24.jpg
FFXV 2160 5-26-24.jpg
 
4K high for pure interest :)

1716831516371.png
 
No idea if this is any good for a R9 5900x and a RX 6700XT combo, but I'll survive if it ain't ;) .

FFXV 1080.gif


FFXV 1440P.gif


FFXV 2160.gif


I do however notice the limitations of the GPU when the resolution increases.
 
AVATARAT said:
Your 1080p result is not by rules from the first page.
This benchmark need faster single thread/high frequency for better result.
Click to expand...
Yup my bad, didn't read it all :shadedshu:.

Below 1080p at standard settings and full screen. Looking at the results on page one I'm pretty much on par with the RX 6700XT scores. Indeed if I have time to tickle the CPU a bit I might increases. My CPU is capable to do 5150 MHz single core, just needs some tweaking.
 

Attachments

  • FFXV 1080P standard.gif
    FFXV 1080P standard.gif
    226.6 KB · Views: 74
Noci said:
Yup my bad, didn't read it all :shadedshu:.

Below 1080p at standard settings and full screen. Looking at the results on page one I'm pretty much on par with the RX 6700XT scores. Indeed if I have time to tickle the CPU a bit I might increases. My CPU is capable to do 5150 MHz single core, just needs some tweaking.
Click to expand...
Nice boost there, with PBO+200 my 5800X hits up to 5.05 :)
 
Keullo-e said:
Nice boost there, with PBO+200 my 5800X hits up to 5.05 :)
Click to expand...
Your lucky you got a good 5800X mine wouldn't do above 4850MHz without throwing WHEA errors no matter the voltage thrown at it
 
Athlonite said:
Your lucky you got a good 5800X mine wouldn't do above 4850MHz without throwing WHEA errors no matter the voltage thrown at it
Click to expand...
-20 CO also for all cores. Maybe some fine-tuning would allow to put more for some cores but meeeeeh, it's fine like this.
 
Apparently, I was running an old version.

V1.3:

ff xv 13 1980 standard 5-28-24.jpg
ff xv 13 1980 high 5-28-24.jpg
 
Keullo-e said:
Can you run at 4K? Would be interesting to see how 4070 TiS manages that.


My run with 6700 XT :)

View attachment 349099
Click to expand...

Sure, later today.

I did a 4K run with the old version in Post #953 above^. Will do it with V1.3 after work.

One thing I noticed monitoring the runs with RivaTuner, the frame rate never goes above 240FPS.

Here it is:

ffxv 4k 5-29-24.jpg
 
Last edited:
Arctucas said:
Sure, later today.

I did a 4K run with the old version in Post #953 above^. Will do it with V1.3 after work.

One thing I noticed monitoring the runs with RivaTuner, the frame rate never goes above 240FPS.

Here it is:

View attachment 349161
Click to expand...
what clocks you using for gpu, im running at 2580 and getting 10500 4k normal mode, but it is only using around 200 watts
 
I think loose some Fps because I use the UHD 770 for display... can make the 4060ti in idle mode 6.81w
Not Bad for a 35w cpu :D
final fantasy.png
 
FF XV i7-11800H RTX 3050 Laptop - ASUS TUF F15

FF XV i7-11800H.PNG
 
Finally managed to complete a run on my Arc A380. Before this, it would always artifact and crash during the battle scene.

I'm not sure what the deal is, but turning the power and temp limits to 40W and 85C (from 45W and 90C), respectively, seemed to make all the difference. This time, it started artifacting and freaking out toward the end of the Shiva scene, but then it was completely fine for the rest of the run.

This is the only game/program where I've had this kind of issue with this card.

ASRock Arc A380 LP, ReBAR enabled, PCIe 4x 3.0 (because Dell)

ffxvbench-a380.png
 
I finally got it working on my $50 ASRock BC-250 crypto-mining server blade (runs a cut-down version of the PS5's CPU). All it took was a premade Linux image and a custom BIOS to adjust the VRAM split.

ASRock BC-250: Zen 2 6C12T, 16GB GDDR6 shared, 24 RDNA2 CUs (slightly fewer than an RX 6600), Fedora 40 with custom GPU drivers.

ffxvbench-bc250.png


Lots of graphical bugs with this thing, but it's not intended to be used this way anyway.
 
Last edited:
9700x PBO
2x32GB 6200MT/s
RTX 4080 Super

FF_XV_2k_18997.png
FF_XV_FHD_23433.png
 
AMD 8845hs, 780m @3.3GHz
3997

3997.jpg
 
Started playing around with the BC-250 again. Ditched the premade Fedora build in favor of a fresh install followed by a community-made setup script to get GPU drivers working.

This is my third run; each one has been better than the last.

Memory split is 512MB to the GPU and the rest to the CPU.

ffxvbench-bc250-fedora41-proper.png


We're finally getting the performance I'd expect from 24 RDNA2 compute units. All of the visual issues I had with the previous build are completely gone and the benchmark ran pretty much perfectly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top