• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 16 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,841 (3.74/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Priced at NVIDIA MSRP of $430, the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Infinity 3 is a cost-effective choice if you're looking for a model that doesn't break the bank. Palit didn't compromise on the cooling solution, our review confirms: it runs cool and at quiet noise levels.

Show full review
 
Literally the only card reviewed today that I have any interest in at all, and even then, it's still not that appealing for $430. I will never understand the people willing to throw out money on a card with a $100+ premium over MSRP that has less than a 1-2% increase. This will now be year 9 for my $230 GTX 1060 I think, and it looks like it will make it to 10.
 
A 60Ti not beating the previous gen 70. Just call this thing 5050 Ti Nvidia.
 
For the Indiana Jones benchmark, is the "Ray Tracing" benchmark just base game performance, or with Ray Tracing turned on in graphics settings? Because the game uses ray tracing by default, and the "Ray Tracing" option is actually path tracing. So default game performance should go in the ray tracing section, and RT on should go in the path tracing benchmarks.
 
Reasonably priced at 470 euros, but 16 fps average over the 3060ti on 1440p

This is the most absurd thing I've ever seen. Hard pass.
 
For the Indiana Jones benchmark, is the "Ray Tracing" benchmark just base game performance, or with Ray Tracing turned on in graphics settings? Because the game uses ray tracing by default, and the "Ray Tracing" option is actually path tracing. So default game performance should go in the ray tracing section, and RT on should go in the path tracing benchmarks.
Yes, it's "just" RT
 
A 60Ti not beating the previous gen 70. Just call this thing 5050 Ti Nvidia.
Just what I said before - RTX 5060 Ti will not beat RTX 4070.
I expected it will be somewhere 5% below RTX 4070, somewhere between RX 6800 XT and RTX 4070, not 13% below RTX 4070 LOL.

You can get roughly +45% performance uplift with RX 9070 for additional $129. With 75mV undervolt, it will even be on par with RTX 5060 Ti power-draw wise.
being the todays most efficient GPU. RTX 5060 Ti should have been priced $349 to make any sense.

This Blackwell generation is helluva disappointing. Apart from DLSS4 and MFG, it has no additional value compared to RTX 4000 series.
Even after totally disastrous RX 9070 series launch, these new Radeon cards actually bring some notable improvements.
 
just wait for an 8gb version - that will be an absolute "treasure"
nvidia "trust" 8gb version so much they basically enforced embargo on reviewing 8gb version on launch and only send 16gb samples .
The fact that this card is still trailing 2 generations old rtx 3080 and can barely beat rtx 3070 is a joke .
it beats my 3 gens old rtx 2070 super (got it as a second hand part 3 years ago for 250 bucks) by only about 30% and rtx 5060 will be even worse .
nvidia has been "scamming" customers for 3 generations now - it started with 30xx series ...
20xx was not that bad yet - rtx 2070 super was beating 1080ti slightly and rtx 2060 had the performance of gtx 1080 .
20xx was the last decent generation ...
 
Last edited:
RTX 5060 Ti should have been priced $349 to make any sense.

it's not even a question of pricing, only people on very old cards should consider buying this.
 
it's not even a question of pricing, only people on very old cards should consider buying this.
It is always a qestion of pricing, especially bang for buck. As others sometimes say: there's no bad card, just card with bad price. That's it.

So this RTX 5060 Ti 16GB will retail for ~540 € incl. 20% VAT, Assus TUF version for >600 €. Meanwhile, RX 9070 can be bough from 670 €, being much better bang for buck.

Yep, why did Nvidia forbid to review 8GB version of RTX 5060 Ti is good question.
 
Literally the only card reviewed today that I have any interest in at all, and even then, it's still not that appealing for $430. I will never understand the people willing to throw out money on a card with a $100+ premium over MSRP that has less than a 1-2% increase. This will now be year 9 for my $230 GTX 1060 I think, and it looks like it will make it to 10.
My 1070 Ti will keep it company. Today's market is ... I think it should be named circus. Not sure if to laugh or cry, a lot of big announcements, but all just a charade
 
It is always a qestion of pricing, especially bang for buck. As others sometimes say: there's no bad card, just card with bad price. That's it.

So this RTX 5060 Ti 16GB will retail for ~540 € incl. 20% VAT, Assus TUF version for >600 €. Meanwhile, RX 9070 can be bough from 670 €, being much better bang for buck.

Yep, why did Nvidia forbid to review 8GB version of RTX 5060 Ti is good question.

this one cost 460 euros VAT included here, and it's available since day 1, demand is not great at all
 
1745042765161.png


In my country it starts at $707... And Gigabyte is official.
 
Back
Top