• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

PSU recommendation for RTX 5090

I wouldn't know. He was clear that:
NZXT, XPG, CORSAIR, MSI MEG, SUPER FLOWER, BE QUIET all have good PSUs

And obviously I don't consider just him in my analysis of things, but yeah, I'll trust jonnyguru over a lot of other people. He's not failed me in the past

Do you have a source for this? It seems crazy that JonnyGuru would just blanket recommended brands. You NEVER blanket recommend brands, all brands have bad models.

You shouldn't "trust" anyone, you should always confirm and verify across multiple sources.
 
Ok, after looking at the connector from superflower, the psu side has dimples and there are 2 groves,
and the gpu side has 1 groove and i don't see dimples, but it is small enough that i could make mistake, but the front has that small triangular cutout so it looks like second iteration.
I've shown the grooves (slits) that I talk about at this.
View attachment 400111
View attachment 400119View attachment 400120View attachment 400121
(T-40 is for focus :D )
I don't see dimples inside the connector on the gpu side.
ps thanks, cause of this thread now I know how to make photos of stuff for closeups :D
Edit: And I thought I could destroy something again xD and now it is not needed :(
Thank you very much for this contribution!
I also appreciate the fact that you didn't destroy the connector.
:toast:
The picture from post #41 wasn't clear enough but now I am at peace in this regard, the receptacles are the NTK design, 1 slit, 4 leaf spring which is regarded as the best.
On top of that I found a comment on newegg saying the same thing.

/////

Okay now regarding the insulation and temperature rating, also addressing some things jonnyguru said.
We have to pay close attention to the details.
So he said that the wires almost hit 80°C with a 4090. That one draws about 450W not 600W which is the cable rating.
Then he says that when he tested the cable at 600W draw the temperature at the GPU connection (not the wires!) exceeded 80°C.
Apples and oranges much?
But okay let's assume that both areas reach similar temps.
Aris says he wants the thermistor as close to the pins as possible. Why is that? Because the point of entry on the GPU is the weakest link in the chain and there's the quickest way to catch the danger not further along the cable. The examples I've seen of melted connectors were mostly (by far) on the GPU side and regarding the actual connector, not the wires that follow it. Sure if the damage was severe the insulation behind the connector eventually melted but it all started from the point of entry in the GPU and not the floating portion of the cable getting so hot that it ignited the insulation.

Then this test here:
Different PSUs and each tested with its own cable. Similar temps for both areas in some examples although there are differences in others.

Jonnyguru says "almost 80" with the 4090, that would mean above 75, because if it was lower he would've said "almost 75". Then with a 5090 type of load it's below 85, otherwise he would've said "exceeded 85". So from 75 to 85 it's 10°C maximum, but minimum it could be only 5 from 77-78 to 82-83.
Even if we assume equal temp between the wire and connector, 5-10°C more on the 5090 compared with the 4090 is quite low, I would expect at least 15 given the power draw difference and the cable running close to max rating.
^Also here it's mentioned the wires get as hot as the connector. But look at the actual temps and the load compared to Jonny's claims!

In his test below, he says max temp of about 53°C, using a power draw similar to 5090 not 4090.
So which is it? Also he's using the "squid".

Also he had an exchange with a user about the temperature testing of the cables:
For Corsair we have this here:
And not much else.
I don't want to throw shade at him but I think he's confusing things, the connector is supposed to rated at 105°C, not specifically the wire insulation:
About the insulation, the only mention I've found is Igor's article which then lead to a GN video.
These are linked in his website page with the connector test above.

These tested ones are all "squid" adapters, the wire is 14AWG not 16, and indeed they are rated 105°C, but from further reading online it appears that insulation type is also correlated with wire type. So are 16AWG cables really supposed to be rated at 105?
Looking at 8 pin VGA/PCI-E cables I see 16AWG 80°C 300V on them, and the 12VHPWR to 2x8 pin cable is basically two 8 pin cables terminating in this connector, so why would the wires be different than regular 8 pin?
I am taking a gamble but I say he is confusing things.

Owners of Corsair PSUs could help us in this matter, I have searched high and low online for a close-up picture of a cable (the wires not the connector) and to no avail.
The cable that I'm talking about is CP-8920284. This is bare, I don't know if there are markings on it to be honest, I found one picture where it looks like it has markings but it's not legible.

At least Super Flower is honest, it doesn't hide anything, the cables could have easily been given a matte coating, sleeving or some shit to cover up the markings, no?
How do we know other vendors are using 105°C cables, are they marked?
Jonnyguru is basically swimming in PSUs, can't he gather cables from each one, put them on a table and take photos? He could clear up this situation within the course of an afternoon.

Why would Super Flower be so stupid as to gimp the cable by cheaping out on the wire insulation?
The connector has the best receptacles, why would that be paired with wires having subpar insulation?
Well apparently not.
Lo and behold, the same cable, so much for SF being an outlier.
But yeah, specifically the nzxt c1500 and c1200 I linked to him seemed to have his approval.
The hwbusters review is positive.
But what about the cable?
Because the only issue with the SF was the cable, how can you make sure that a different PSU has a 105°C cable assuming this is really a thing?
How did no one cover this topic during these years? Not him, not Aris, not GN, not Igor, not Roman, no one, reddit comes out empty when searching for this.

I think we started a witch hunt, but there's no witch in sight.
If he wants to be worthy of his legend status he should step up and clarify, I'm sure he has the stockpile and gear to prove whatever is needed.
It's easy to sit in his ivory tower and hurl loogies at everyone, if he wants to contribute something valuable and help the community he should step up.

That's why nVidia got away with this shitshow, because the experts did not work together to cover all aspects and direct criticism at nVidia and other parties involved to enforce full standardisation of this garbage connector/cable not just parts of it.
 
Do you have a source for this? It seems crazy that JonnyGuru would just blanket recommended brands. You NEVER blanket recommend brands, all brands have bad models.

You shouldn't "trust" anyone, you should always confirm and verify across multiple sources.
I'm certain that when he named those brands he had specific PSUs in mind. Everybody knows that within a same brand you can have trash PSUs and top tier PSUs obviously. I think when he mentionned specific brands, he probably meant who their components come from, who makes them (CWT etc..)

And yes of course, I make my own research, I ask questions.... I seek more knowledge to make better choices, this thread and many others I have made on TPU are proof that I do exactly that, all the time.

But I'll say it again, jonnyguru has earned my trust over the years. It's not blind trust obviously, but yeah, I'd trust him more than some other random person who doesn't have his kind of expertise
 
The AWG can be obtained from hwbusters, they have all cables from psu reviews listed with AWG, but without temperatures on cables, I've searched some psu's and all that I've searched had 16AWG for HPWR.
 
If he wants to be worthy of his legend status he should step up and clarify, I'm sure he has the stockpile and gear to prove whatever is needed.
It's easy to sit in his ivory tower and hurl loogies at everyone, if he wants to contribute something valuable and help the community he should step up.

That's why nVidia got away with this shitshow, because the experts did not work together to cover all aspects and direct criticism at nVidia and other parties involved to enforce full standardisation of this garbage connector/cable not just parts of it.
yeah him or aris could realtively easily gather 10 -20 best 850w-1kW-1,2kW units and investigate the provided cables on each of them .
that being said it baffles me that even the most reputable psu brands are not too transparent about this either and not to eager to share information,
especially after the initial fiasco around 12VHPWR .
it should be common practice to disclose max rated operating temperatures for the cable and the connector (if not on the marketing page than at least in the psu manual itself)
 
yeah him or aris could realtively easily gather 10 -20 best 850w-1kW-1,2kW units and investigate the provided cables on each of them .
that being said it baffles me that even the most reputable psu brands are not too transparent about this either and not to eager to share information,
especially after the initial fiasco around 12VHPWR .
it should be common practice to disclose max rated operating temperatures for the cable and the connector (if not on the marketing page than at least in the psu manual itself)
I would say that the brands I already posted (and others which I will post below) where you can see the markings they are transparent about it in a roundabout way (at least it's a bare wire so everyone can see).
It's that one company that supposedly has sky-high temp rating that is so illusive, I can't find a single goddamn picture (word of mouth FTW).
Identical cable to the Super Flower and Enermax mentioned previously. Notice the 2 empty slots in the 8 pin sockets. Markings are visible, as expected 16AWG 80°C 300V.
Seasonic putting mesh on each wire to hide the truth. Notice the length and empty slots on 8 pin sockets. We all know what's underneath, apart from the mesh it's an identical cable to the ones previously mentioned.
Seasonic sleeved, you can see the markings, 16AWG 80°C 300V.

What was Jonny saying again?
That most vendors he knows use 105°C rated cables, and that SF is an outlier?
Nice try, go sell your BS elsewhere.

Even if Corsair has higher rated cables what the hell are we all supposed to do, switch to Corsair en masse?
And if they do, so what it's mostly marketing, otherwise everyone who uses other brands would have their PC blow up in their face.

Case closed for me, the burden of proof is on him.
 
I just got my super flower Leadex vii XP platinum 1200w and I'll be able to provide pictures of the cables, conenctors and ratings
 
I just got my super flower Leadex vii XP platinum 1200w and I'll be able to provide pictures of the cables, conenctors and ratings
I'm curious if it's something different from My Super Flower Leadex VII Gold 1000W :).
 
I just got my super flower Leadex vii XP platinum 1200w and I'll be able to provide pictures of the cables, conenctors and ratings
Looking forward to it.
I'm curious if it's something different from My Super Flower Leadex VII Gold 1000W :).
This one has special 9 pin sockets.
But I'm willing to bet everything else is the same, and the 9 pin sockets will have 3 empty slots. :eek:
The more you know:
Rendered images but 100% 3 slots will be empty.

/////

Regarding my previous post, I have one more example:
Based on the examples I've posted it looks like Corsair is the outlier, provided it truly uses 105°C insulation.

Also regarding Corsair cables, this is the official webpage, with idealized rendered image, all 8 pin slots populated:
And this is the reality:
 
I mean they can't take all 16 pins from the dual 8 pin and make them 12 pin though so I'm not sure what is the issue. Even if they were populated they'd just be dummy pins anyways.

only 3 supply power anyways afaik.

Spsgx (1).png
 
I mean they can't take all 16 pins from the dual 8 pin and make them 12 pin though so I'm not sure what is the issue. Even if they were populated they'd just be dummy pins anyways.

only 3 supply power anyways afaik.

View attachment 400499
The quality of the Super Flower cable came into question at post #41 because it has 2 empty slots in the 8 pin socket.
The examples I've posted of other cables having the exact the same config, are meant to show that there is no problem.
Aris also said the missing sense pins are of no concern.
 
Also regarding Corsair cables, this is the official webpage, with idealized rendered image, all 8 pin slots populated:
If You count the cables it is only 12 main. it looks like dummy pin.
 
Here are the pictures of the super flower Leadex vii XP platinum 1200w

80c rated cables
 

Attachments

  • 20250520_152822.jpg
    20250520_152822.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 34
  • 20250520_152817.jpg
    20250520_152817.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 47
  • 20250520_152814.jpg
    20250520_152814.jpg
    776.3 KB · Views: 40
80c rated cables
Along with the examples I've posted from Enermax, Phanteks, Seasonic and be quiet! I think we can put this to rest. There's no cause for concern in this regard.
 
Do you have a source for this? It seems crazy that JonnyGuru would just blanket recommended brands. You NEVER blanket recommend brands, all brands have bad models.

You shouldn't "trust" anyone, you should always confirm and verify across multiple sources.
We were talking about specific models

Well... There's been a lot of back and forth here. I'm not going to directly address anyone, so I'll just start typing and you can choose to read it or not....

I'm late to the conversation. Some feelings were hurt... a cool down period was required... we're good now.

Keep in mind that the following post is "stream of thought", so as the great Prince once said, "forgive me if it goes astray".

Along with the examples I've posted from Enermax, Phanteks, Seasonic and be quiet! I think we can put this to rest. There's no cause for concern in this regard.

I'll start with this one....

The Phanteks is made by Seasonic, so there's that. The high end beQuiets do use 105°C, I'm fairly certain. Might be OEM dependant because that's a thing and I'll get to that in a bit.... And Enermax is using some random China based supplier, so all bets are off there....

Is the recommended temperature for the wire insulation AND connector 105°C?
1748887709624.png

Let's use our heads guys... if the connector is 105°C and the insulation goes up to and partially into the connector, how do you achieve 105°C operating temperature spec without 105°C rated wire?

The contradictions I see here and on Reddit are baffling. Truly an exercise in human behavior for those inclined to study it.

On Reddit, multiple people said, "Jon was hired by Corsair to reduce costs while Corsair maintains their high profit margins". Then why are we using more expensive 105°C wires? Why are we using more expensive Hong Hua fans? Why do we use an MCU to control a PWM fan when using an analog controller with a variable DC output is much cheaper. Surprising.

The thing about making cables is you have to buy the materials up front. Some PSU factories, like CWT and HEC, for example, have their own cable manufacturing capabilities. Others do not. Some cable manufacturers are smaller than others. Not going to lie... people have seen what's happened with Corsair for using a cable manufacturer that is very good at what they do, but produce a limited supplier. Corsair is PERPETUALLY out of aftermarket cables and it pisses me off, but there's nothing I can do about that other than switch manufacturers, but with melting cables, do I want to switch horses mid race?

You walk into a cable factory. There are spools of wire that are about four feet in diameter along with spools of terminals that are about three feet in diameter... if you're going to spend the money, you need to commit. If you can't commit or are spot buying off the shelf cables, you get what you get... or rather.. you get what you pay for.

80°C is used on everything else (SATA, PATA, 24-pin, EPS12V, etc). You can go through those spools pretty quickly. A 105°C spool is not only more expensive, but would have to be on machines that are dedicated to making 12V-2x6 cables, tying up the machine and the operator. If you amortize that cost as well as the material cost into your whole cable set, your cable costs are easily doubled. Nevermind the act of qualification, destructive QC testing and nevermind having to do a CPK report (I'm sure someone in here knows Six Sigma process) is not cheap and creates a lot of scrap. For example: You can't do a pull test on a terminal to test the quality of the crimp without destroying the crimp. You can't find the thermal threshold of a cable unless you melt that cable, etc.

So... why use a more expensive wire?

Well... Fortunately, I have an engineering team that I can tie up with testing. That said, I do have to admit that I like to save most of the destructive testing for myself. If someone tells me "this PSU is probably going to blow" or "this cable is probably going to melt", I want to be hands on. :D

We tested 125°C, 105°C and 80°C cables at 55A in a 80°C chamber, 100 pieces of each. Of course, the chamber is used to equalize the ambient temperature. The actual connector gets much hotter and we measure this with NTC thermistors glued to the parts. Not a FLIR.

1748889809677.png


Of the 105°C and 125°C, none showed any damage. Of the 80°C rated, two showed signs of damage.

We then up the ante and do a test that we know the cables will failure. You simulate the "not fully inserted" test by putting a spacer between the connector and the load. At this point, you KNOW ALL of the cables will melt. You just measure how long it takes to happen. The test is repeated with a 10mm, 20mm and 30mm spacing. Surprisingly, the 125°C and 105°C survived the same period of time, so we took the 125°C out of the equation and stopped production of that product. If some of you have an RMx with one gray cable, the reason why it's gray is because we couldn't get 125°C in the same shade of black as the other wires. The 85°C wires all melted in half the time.

So, why no markings? How do you mark individually sleeved cables? Debossed cables are not marked because you wouldn't be able to read them after it gets debossed.

Also, just so you guys know... I'm not replacing Andy as the CEO. :D My role at Corsair is R&D. That doesn't mean I decide what needs to get brought to market, decide how much to sell it for or what supplier to use. The phrase I like to use is "it's my job to ensure that the product that ships isn't prone to self destruction." Some projects I put 100% into and fight to the death to get absolutely perfect. RMx and SF come to mind. Others are just "low hanging fruit" that someone else decides are the direction to go in. Someone in this thread mentioned the old CX-M and the current CX. Yep. That happens. Again. as long as it doesn't blow up in someone's face, my job is done. For example: low end CWT PSUs tend to blow up with low mains voltage. Anyone that cared to notice (I don't think anyone noticed) will note a thermistor on the bridge diode heatsink. This added cost. Is it something you market? Is it something a reviewer is going to point out? Nope. This is why I can't get too bent out of shape when some random here or on Reddit says it's my job to make Corsair PSUs cheaper.

As for the "of course he's a Corsair shill" comments: Do I have to carry the Corsair flag everywhere I go? Of course not. Corsair knew when they hired me that I was a reviewer first and foremost. CWT, HEC, Super Flower, High Power... even FSP sometimes... all make some very good products and I'm not afraid to admit that. I've also found since starting to work at Corsair that a lot of vendors are shady as shit and make a lot of garbage and try to hide it. Some I've been forced to expose and they've been made to fix their mistakes and while we've given certain suppliers second and third chances, they keep fucking up and now they're on a shit list. I think that's fair. If my argument to explain why an HX1000i is a better choice than a C1000 or an RM850x is a better choice than a MSI A850G aren't valid to a particular user's needs or budget, I'm not going to be a shill and push it. But if it's not a good product, I'll tell you why it's not a good product. But if it IS a good product, I'm not going to make shit up to change your mind.

Oh.. and I can't believe someone brought up the whole "dimple vs. leaf spring (as Jayz calls them)" and number of splits in the terminal.

Come on guys.. we're better than this. Trust the engineers. Not the influencers. We're not living in Idiocracy (yet).
 
Last edited:
First of all thank you for posting. :)
The high end beQuiets do use 105°C, I'm fairly certain.
I haven't found a single picture online with cables that have 16AWG 105°C 300V marked on them. What I did find is that the "squid" adapters have 14AWG 105°C 300V.
So if these higher rated cables are supposed to be marked or not I wouldn't know.
Is the recommended temperature for the wire insulation AND connector 105°C?
1748887709624.png

Let's use our heads guys... if the connector is 105°C and the insulation goes up to and partially into the connector, how do you achieve 105°C operating temperature spec without 105°C rated wire?
There is one thing I would like clarified.
So the 12VHPWR to 2x8 pin is basically two 8 pin cables that come together on one end to terminate with this new connector.
The regular 8 pin VGA cables have 16AWG 80°C 300V on them (some have 18AWG, I've seen it).

So if they're regular 8 pin VGA cables the insulation is apparently enough (or maybe not, you would know better) but in this new context it's right on the edge?

But isn't the 16 gauge on the edge as well? Wouldn't it be safer with 14? It would make the cable stiffer, but I'm not moaning about that right now, if it would be safer I'd take it.

And with the 12VHPWR to 2x8 pin cable are the 8 pin connectors rated for 105°C as well?
So, why no markings? How do you mark individually sleeved cables? Debossed cables are not marked because you wouldn't be able to read them after it gets debossed.
Damn, and I was just about to ask for a picture with the markings for the CP-8920284 Type 4 cable. :laugh:
But if the insulation for the "squid" adapters says 105°C why can't the one for the native 12VHPWR cable be marked?
Oh.. and I can't believe someone brought up the whole "dimple vs. leaf spring (as Jayz calls them)" and number of splits in the terminal.
Yeah well I did, and honestly I don't regret it, if it makes no difference all the better, but in case it would've made a difference then...

/////

I don't want to be that guy, but couldn't you have brought this into the spotlight some two years or so ago? Like raise hell? You did test the "squid" adapters so why not go all the way?
Now we have the 5090 which made things worse, and because there was no prior drama other PSU manufacturers just left things unchanged, things which were on the edge before but now with the 5090 everything is pushed to the limit.

Don't take it as a personal attack it's not meant like that, but your status is different than toobers, so if you didn't engage in this to sort the facts from BS (either alone or with other professionals) then the toobers had the playground all to themselves, and that's how we got to comparing pin terminals and whatever else instead of the important stuff.

Again thank you for the info.
 
There is one thing I would like clarified.
So the 12VHPWR to 2x8 pin is basically two 8 pin cables that come together on one end to terminate with this new connector.
The regular 8 pin VGA cables have 16AWG 80°C 300V on them (some have 18AWG, I've seen it).

So if they're regular 8 pin VGA cables the insulation is apparently enough (or maybe not, you would know better) but in this new context it's right on the edge?
You're talking about 12VHPWR to 2x 8-pin or 2x 8-pin to 12VHPWR?

2x 8-pin to 12VHPWR, at least as it pertains to Corsair cables, are 105°C. 12VHPWR to 2x8-pin are rated at 80°C and do sometimes use 18g. That's because we're talking about a 12VHPWR connector that is handling up to 600W vs. only 300W.

8-pin connectors aren't seeing anywhere close to 600W each. Barely half that. So they don't need the higher rating.

But isn't the 16 gauge on the edge as well? Wouldn't it be safer with 14? It would make the cable stiffer, but I'm not moaning about that right now, if it would be safer I'd take it.
Obviously 14g is better than 16g, but the terminals only support 16g and the terminals are really the weak link. I WISH they supported more, but the don't. Nvidia's adapter isn't limited by the terminal's capability because they're not crimping the wires, they're soldering them down to a board.
1748898408168.png

I don't want to be that guy, but couldn't you have brought this into the spotlight some two years or so ago? Like raise hell? You did test the "squid" adapters so why not go all the way?
Now we have the 5090 which made things worse, and because there was no prior drama other PSU manufacturers just left things unchanged, things which were on the edge before but now with the 5090 everything is pushed to the limit.
I did. I do. But I get shouted down by influencers and downvoted on Reddit, etc. So what's the point? People are going to believe the one with the most sponsors.
 
You're talking about 12VHPWR to 2x 8-pin or 2x 8-pin to 12VHPWR?
Wait what?
I mean the cable that has the 12VHPWR (or 12V-2x6) connector on one end and two 8 pin connectors on the other end.
2x 8-pin to 12VHPWR, at least as it pertains to Corsair cables, are 105°C. 12VHPWR to 2x8-pin are rated at 80°C and do sometimes use 18g. That's because we're talking about a 12VHPWR connector that is handling up to 600W vs. only 300W.
I was referring to the fact that if I cut the 12VHPWR connector off I am left with what would be two incomplete 8 pin VGA cables.
If I would attach the 6+2 pin connectors on the ends I would basically have two regular 8 pin VGA cables.
The wires are the same, no?

So that's what I meant, if it's a regular VGA cable the 80°C insulation is enough because it carries 300W, but if there are two cables they are each carrying 300W and only at the GPU end do they come together to put a combined 600W through the 12VHPWR connector. But until that point wouldn't the regular insulation be enough?
I hope I'm making myself clear.
8-pin connectors aren't seeing anywhere close to 600W each. Barely half that. So they don't need the higher rating.
Okay so at the PSU side the cable with two 8 pin connectors is safe in this regard. The cable that has 12V-2x6 at the PSU side doesn't have an advantage.
Obviously 14g is better than 16g, but the terminals only support 16g and the terminals are really the weak link. I WISH they supported more, but the don't. Nvidia's adapter isn't limited by the terminal's capability because they're not crimping the wires, they're soldering them down to a board.
So it was engineered to be on the edge, and with the 5090 they definitely pushed the limits.
I did. I do. But I get shouted down by influencers and downvoted on Reddit, etc. So what's the point? People are going to believe the one with the most sponsors.
If someone like you who's also backed by Corsair can't win against these guys then we're effed.
Why did PCI-SIG agree to rate this cable at 600W? 450W seems much more reasonable. And then the goddamn 5090 would've required two cables. I mean who exactly in the industry, an institution not an individual, can regulate and take action so that pet projects like this (it kinda feels like one at this point) don't go out of control?
 
Wait what?
I mean the cable that has the 12VHPWR (or 12V-2x6) connector on one end and two 8 pin connectors on the other end.
There's two different cables. One that you plug a 12V-2x6 that splits into two 6+2-pin PCIe cables that are typically rated at 80°C and often use 18g wire because they're made to support 300W TOTAL not 600W.

There are two 8-pin (not PCIe, but like Type 4, for example) that go to a single 12V-2x6. These typically use the same material as a 12VHPWR to 12VHPWR, which for me should be 16g and 105°C related insulation.

I hope you didn't see any 2x 8-pin to 12V-2x6 (or 12VHPWR, whatever), that have 18g wire. At least not one that's rated at 600W. That would be suicidal. There are 450W cables that use 18g, but the cards that support these don't even use 450W. Many of them are actually 300W cards.

Why did PCI-SIG agree to rate this cable at 600W? 450W seems much more reasonable. And then the goddamn 5090 would've required two cables. I mean who exactly in the industry, an institution not an individual, can regulate and take action so that pet projects like this (it kinda feels like one at this point) don't go out of control?
Unfortunately, the entire consortium don't get to vote on these things. Only "interested parties". Nvidia didn't seem to include an experienced engineer familiar with connectors, terminals, their tolerances, etc. until PCIe 5.1 and this individual's hands were tied with having to make something backwards compatible. You also have to consider the direction this took. The original 12-pin was more than adequate for the 350W cards they were powering. Who how and why it was decided to not completely change this connector, or at least use two, once cards that required more power came to market is beyond me.

For Nvidia to admit they are wrong at this juncture is akin to admission of guilt and I believe would put them in line with a class action lawsuit. Just look at what happened to Abit when they admitted that they use faulty capacitors during the capacitor plague. They were trying to do the right thing, said they'd replace everyone's motherboards and would only use Japanese capacitors moving forward. Instead, someone filed a class action lawsuit that contributed to Abit going out of business. Not that Nvidia would go out of business due to a class action lawsuit, but it would be painful as they would have to support and and all cards using the connector.

FORTUNATELY, the number of melted connectors is very few and far between. The fact that there's a "master thread" on Reddit and Videocardz reports on every one makes it seem more of an epidemic than it really is. I've only had the opportunity to see one Corsair cable that melted that couldn't be blamed on user error. The problem seemed to be a QC issue with the crimp, which is unfortunately not something easily caught in production. That said, it's my opinion that the margin of error is too great for a consumer product like this. Even if .001% are melting and 90% of those are caused by user error, that's still too high.
 
There's two different cables. One that you plug a 12V-2x6 that splits into two 6+2-pin PCIe cables that are typically rated at 80°C and often use 18g wire because they're made to support 300W TOTAL not 600W.
Oh you were referring to these:
The lower rated cables for lower wattage PSUs.
Having those around makes this situation even worse, at least they're marked. :mad:
There are two 8-pin (not PCIe, but like Type 4, for example) that go to a single 12V-2x6. These typically use the same material as a 12VHPWR to 12VHPWR, which for me should be 16g and 105°C related insulation.
But aren't the wires from these two cables (that connect to 8 pin on the PSU) the same as VGA 8 pin to 6+2 pin, only instead of 6+2 pin they come together into the 12V-2x6 connector?
iil-337171-656671.jpg
It looks like they do, it would make sense from a manufacturing standpoint, it would save a lot of money, I understand the Corsair Type 4 has different insulation for these 16AWG wires, but other mfgs use the same 16AWG 80°C 300V marked wires.
Cost-cutting, nothing new here, what I don't understand is why didn't PCI-SIG enforce the temp rating on the wire insulation as well? Even better enforce everything that pertains to this cable, they left too much open to interpretation. The problem is that the current incarnation of this cable is not maxed out within its constraints, improving and overbuilding it would require additional costs, but if the current one were fully standardised from the start a lot of melting could have been avoided even with these slim safety margins.

What is very bizarre is that the sense wires are marked 24AWG 105°C 150V. So they don't melt from all that sensing! :roll:
I hope you didn't see any 2x 8-pin to 12V-2x6 (or 12VHPWR, whatever), that have 18g wire. At least not one that's rated at 600W. That would be suicidal. There are 450W cables that use 18g, but the cards that support these don't even use 450W. Many of them are actually 300W cards.
No, I meant the VGA/PCI-E cables, 8 pin to 6+2 pin, I've seen two flavors either 16AWG or 18AWG.

/////

I understand about PCI-SIG, shame that it went like that. I would have expected Intel and AMD to have a say in this, now there are AMD GPUs with this connector, they're not risky as a 5090 but still.
Maybe I have my expectations directed at the wrong crowd.

So... can I be relaxed about using the included cable of the SF 1000W XG with a 5070 Ti? Thank you.
 
Oh you were referring to these:
The lower rated cables for lower wattage PSUs.
Having those around makes this situation even worse, at least they're marked. :mad:
That's not supposed to happen because of the sense wires. That's what the sense wires are for. If the sense wires are wired for 600W, they should be using 16g wire. If the sense wires are wired for 300W or 450W, then the cable can use lower gauge wires.
1748972090534.png

The PCIe spec says that if a lesser cable is used, the card should "clock down", but so far with 100% of the cards I've seen, the card simply refuses to POST if the appropriate cable is not in use.

But aren't the wires from these two cables (that connect to 8 pin on the PSU) the same as VGA 8 pin to 6+2 pin, only instead of 6+2 pin they come together into the 12V-2x6 connector?
View attachment 402282
On these two, yes. Because the termination is still a 600W 12V-2x6 connector. So the same rules apply. If you were not trying to power a 600W card, then a cheaper cable can be used.

No, I meant the VGA/PCI-E cables, 8 pin to 6+2 pin, I've seen two flavors either 16AWG or 18AWG.
18g is fine for a 6+2-pin that only has one connector on it. This cable is only supposed to support 150W. When you have a pigtail PCIe is when 16g should be used because you're supporting 300W at the PSU end.

So... can I be relaxed about using the included cable of the SF 1000W XG with a 5070 Ti? Thank you.
Of course. Because the 5070 is only a 300W card. You could use 80°C rated 18g wire on that thing and never see a problem.
 
We're not living in Idiocracy (yet).

Sometimes, I'm not too sure about that, mate. :banghead:

Good development on the thread. I think I learned a thing or two today :)
 
Back
Top