• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Synology Launches Six New Plus Series NAS Devices at Computex 2025

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,643 (2.48/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Although Synology already announced its first plus series NAS in its 2025 range a month ago with the DS925+ and its accompanying expansion unit, the company had no less than six new devices on display at Computex. We also talked at length with the company and got an explanation as to why the company decided to move to supporting its own brand drives only and it turns out the situation isn't quite what Synology's press release made it seem like, but more on that after we go over the new devices.

The new range starts with the DS225+ and the DS425+, where the DS225+ is the new base model of the plus series. Both models are built around an Intel Celeron J4125—a chip that launched at the end of 2019—which is paired with 2 GB of DDR4 which can be expanded to 6 GB in total. Both models come with one 2.5 Gbps and one 1 Gbps Ethernet port, two 5 Gbps USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports and two or four drive bays. The DS425+ also gets a pair of M.2 2280 NVMe SSD slots, but unless the CPU information provided is wrong, these will only be PCIe 2.0 and will most likely not sport more than one or two lanes.




Next up is the DS725+ which is built around an AMD Ryzen R1600 SoC which comes with 4 GB of ECC DDR4 memory as standard and it can be upgraded to 32 GB. Synology has equipped the DS725+ with a pair of M.2 2280 slots as well, but this time they're PCIe 3.0 at least and possibly even four lanes wide. There's also what Synology calls an expansion port here, which is a USB Type-C port which most likely supports 10 Gbps data transfers, but Synology doesn't mention the actual transfer speeds anywhere in the specs.



Next up we have the DS1525+ and DS1825+ which are five and eight bay versions of largely the same hardware. Both models are based on the same AMD Ryzen V1500B SoC as the DS925+, but ships with 8 GB of ECC DDR4 memory instead of 4 GB for the DS925+. Once again the PCIe interface is of the 3.0 variety and both models have a pair of M.2 slots for NVMe SSDs. The two Ethernet ports are both 2.5 Gbps and the DS1525+ has what Synology calls a network upgrade slot, whereas the DS1825+ has a PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe expansion slot. Both models have a pair of USB Type-C expansion ports and the DS1525+ gets two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, whereas the DS1825+ gets three.



The last new model is the FS200T which is a niche product, once again based on the aging Celeron J4126, although paired with 4 GB of DDR4, upgradable to 8 GB. It has six 2.5 SATA drive bays and it's intended to be used with SATA SSDs. Around the back is one 2.5 Gbps and one 1 Gbps Ethernet port, as well as two USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1 5 Gbps ports. Apart from the DS225+ and the FS200T, you should be able to find all the new products on Synology's website now.



As for the debacle with the plus models only being certified for use with Synology branded drives, it appears that the company communicated its plans very poorly and there's no excuse for the press release that was put out. Synology will allow other drives to be used with its plus range of NAS appliances, but it's under the condition that the likes of Seagate, Toshiba and WD validate their drives with the specific model in accordance with Synology's validation program. There are quite some gotchas with this, as for starters, it's unclear if these companies will agree to this and if they do, it might only be for a few limited drives, like their NAS specific products.

As it was explained to us, Synology got tired of trying to validate third party drives, as the hard drive makers change things without notifying Synology about changes to their drives and the company felt that they were spending too many resources on validating drives for the hard drive manufacturers. Not doing so is a big gamble from Synology's side, but clearly also a push to try and sell bundles to their customers. From our understanding, the feedback has been good from their business customers, but Synology is aware of the feedback from its consumer customers and the company is listening to feedback, but the question is if that will be enough to retain many of their consumer customers.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Since the new gen only support Syntology´s own drives, they can keep them.
 
Since the new gen only support Syntology´s own drives, they can keep them.
One million times this. I saw this and thought "ooh 2.5GBit in the little ones, I need a new NAS" and then remembered that requirement.

So that's one sale lost to that policy.
 
Numbers are changing just not the ones that matter, they paddle the same crap they are becoming like EA Fifa series same crap on every release.
 
Since the new gen only support Syntology´s own drives, they can keep them.
Maybe read the news post?
I explained in some detail what's going on, but yes, for now, I guess it's true that only their own drives are supported.
We'll have to wait and see if the hard drive manufacturers agree to do the testing on behalf of Synology or not.
 
As for the debacle with the plus models only being certified for use with Synology branded drives, it appears that the company communicated its plans very poorly and there's no excuse for the press release that was put out. Synology will allow other drives to be used with its plus range of NAS appliances, but it's under the condition that the likes of Seagate, Toshiba and WD validate their drives with the specific model in accordance with Synology's validation program.
It smells like backtracking.

Sorry, but it's too late and too little.
 
We'll have to wait and see if the hard drive manufacturers agree to do the testing on behalf of Synology or not.
At that point, I can bet that Synology will come up with another excuse to block them.

Sorry but they lost my business and mind you, I have been using and buying Synology NASes for over 10 years.

I'm preparing to migrate away before my 918+ dies.
 
It smells like backtracking.

Sorry, but it's too late and too little.
It might very well be, I can't say, but my bigger concern is if the hard drive makers will agree to their terms or not. If they don't, then I believe Synology has painted themselves into a corner.

At that point, I can bet that Synology will come up with another excuse to block them.
My understanding from my hour long chat with them today, is that this wasn't the intention as such, but yeah.
Sorry but they lost my business and mind you, I have been using and buying Synology NASes for over 10 years.

I'm preparing to migrate away before my 918+ dies.
And this is something I was very clear about, as I've read everyone's comments here over the past month and I understand that many of you are upset.
I'm not sure if the person I talked to has any real pull with management, but I do believe he will relay my comments based on the TPU readership feedback about this, to the management at the company.
I believe part of it is that they think they're too big to fail, as they claim they have 70% of the consumer and soho NAS market, so even if they lose "a few" customers, it's not too big of a deal for them. This doesn't feel like the right attitude to me, but it is what it is.

I'm only trying to relay the conversation I had today at the show and I honestly have no idea how this will play out long term, but it's clear that they've already lost some customers and it's going to be very hard for them to communicate their "full" intent at a later stage, when they've already posted the press release in question.
 
Last edited:
my comments based on the TPU readership feedback about this,
You should add the comments from the Youtube channel NASCompares.

People are even telling him to stop wasting his time reporting about synology because nobody wants to hear about it.

Heck, one person said "If you post one more video about synology, I will not only unsubscribe from your channel but will block it".

Synology overestimated their customer base.

Then again, maybe they observed how Ngreedia is abusing their customers and the loyalty is unwaivered, so perhaps they think the same thing will happen to them.
 
You should add the comments from the Youtube channel NASCompares.
They're not my responsibility I'm afraid, I write for TPU, not NASCompares.
Synology overestimated their customer base.

Then again, maybe they observed how Ngreedia is abusing their customers and the loyalty is unwaivered, so perhaps they think the same thing will happen to them.
They're betting bit on high-end rack mounted products for the corporate market and I guess this play works there, but they moved it too far down the product stack.
Apparently most of their business customers had no issues with this change.
 
When I bought enterprise kit it was the done thing to buy drives from the SAN/NAS provider, nobody has an issue with that, and I know cheapskates who put off the shelf drives in Dell machines particularly who had all sorts of weird problems.

Further down the stack it's a complete deal breaker though.
 
Im not buying another Synology product again, the hard drive change even though it doesn't affect me shows that they are great as F more than ever.

My current NAS from them will be my last, I'm hoping that Ubiquiti's NAS's come on in bounds so I can consider them as a replacement.
 
They're not my responsibility I'm afraid, I write for TPU, not NASCompares.

They're betting bit on high-end rack mounted products for the corporate market and I guess this play works there, but they moved it too far down the product stack.
Apparently most of their business customers had no issues with this change.
From my experience, all places that I have worked, we never, not once, cared about the hard drive model.

Only that it was compatible with the device, for example, being NAS compatible, instead of being DVR compatible.

One time we switched from WD to Seagate because WD accused us of sending them counterfeit drives for RMA and refusing to return those drives neither providing the replacement.

But for our NAS and and servers? We didnt care.

So I am not sure why is synology so hanged up on this, besides the little extra money they get from their markup.
 
Last edited:
Some Synology drives have a huge markup - the bigger the capacity the bigger the markup - 8TB is £250 vs £170 for Ironwolf/WD Red. It adds up for a home gamer. Corpo - who cares so long as someone signs the PO.

I've got a basic Syno NAS and want another but things are getting pricey. But then Chinesium alternatives ... Rock and hard place come to mind. I may wait further.
 
Some Synology drives have a huge markup - the bigger the capacity the bigger the markup - 8TB is £250 vs £170 for Ironwolf/WD Red. It adds up for a home gamer. Corpo - who cares so long as someone signs the PO.

I've got a basic Syno NAS and want another but things are getting pricey. But then Chinesium alternatives ... Rock and hard place come to mind. I may wait further.
I passed on this information too, the guy didn't believe me, but was going to look into it. They are Toshiba drives, but apparently with a custom Synology firware.
You still have Asustor and QNAP from Taiwan.
 
They are Toshiba drives, but apparently with a custom Synology firware.
For some reason, I was under the impression that they were Ironwolfs.
 
I passed on this information too, the guy didn't believe me, but was going to look into it. They are Toshiba drives, but apparently with a custom Synology firware.
You still have Asustor and QNAP from Taiwan.
Been following pricing/alternatives for what seems like years - prolly wasted the difference in my time (and more!!). I like DSM and it's never been pwned, QNAP are really better HW and SW is getting better but they've been owned so...

For some reason, I was under the impression that they were Ironwolfs
Always been Tosh afaik - N300s, the cheaper NAS HDDs but noisy.

Problem with the NAS relying on known HDD and being in control is one wrong move from Syno and they could wipe out your array. I like the idea of a layer of separation non Syno HDDs gives. Different for corpo - I'm just tinkering. It's just all my photos and movies of the kids/family from birth onwards. I have backups, 3-2-1 and all that. I lost everything from my childhood - a witsec has more background than me so it made me super cautious.
 
Maybe read the news post?
I explained in some detail what's going on, but yes, for now, I guess it's true that only their own drives are supported.
We'll have to wait and see if the hard drive manufacturers agree to do the testing on behalf of Synology or not.
I did and right now it is just stupid........and unless they speed up communications and following actions they can go f them self.
 
Been following pricing/alternatives for what seems like years - prolly wasted the difference in my time (and more!!). I like DSM and it's never been pwned, QNAP are really better HW and SW is getting better but they've been owned so...
I believe you're mistaken.
 
I'm impressed they've finally gotten 2.5gb NICs on these now. The original plan was to wait until Computex and see if they did just that, but with the way the original hard drive announcement was worded and reported on, I stopped caring and bought a QNAP. Next time around I'll consider them again if this drive policy turns out to be nothing.
 
I understand the reasoning of 'We're spending far too much resources validating drives for these companies and getting effectively nothing in return', that is grounds enough for a pivot in the ecosystem policy...

But their solution sucks. It sucks balls, to be a tad vulgar. As I said before on the press release about this situation, Synology is perfectly within their rights to only offer special warranty services/support on their own branded drives that they've validated to a given performance/endurance standard, and this is very important for business bookkeepers and for less savvy people who want a shield to hide behind in case of catastrophe. They can scale back their validation process to only encompass their own drives and maybe the odd partnered drive. That's okay.

At no point should Synology be degrading the software experience of any of their DiskStation products because non-validated drives are installed in the system. That is hostile to the end user and harms the image of Synology outright. Synology was considered a gold standard in NAS management software; it was simple to use, feature-rich, and generally pleasant. Anything, and I mean anything, destructive towards that standard deserves loss of business.
 
I'm impressed they've finally gotten 2.5gb NICs on these now.
Asustor is going all 5 Gbps at the same time as Synology finally caught up to 2.5 Gbps. I believe we might see the competition moving to 10 Gbps several years ahead of Synology catching up again.

I understand the reasoning of 'We're spending far too much resources validating drives for these companies and getting effectively nothing in return', that is grounds enough for a pivot in the ecosystem policy...

But their solution sucks. It sucks balls, to be a tad vulgar. As I said before on the press release about this situation, Synology is perfectly within their rights to only offer special warranty services/support on their own branded drives that they've validated to a given performance/endurance standard, and this is very important for business bookkeepers and for less savvy people who want a shield to hide behind in case of catastrophe. They can scale back their validation process to only encompass their own drives and maybe the odd partnered drive. That's okay.

At no point should Synology be degrading the software experience of any of their DiskStation products because non-validated drives are installed in the system. That is hostile to the end user and harms the image of Synology outright. Synology was considered a gold standard in NAS management software; it was simple to use, feature-rich, and generally pleasant. Anything, and I mean anything, destructive towards that standard deserves loss of business.
Asustor went the opposite direction and even allow their users to do minor repairs to their NAS and they still honour the warranty, so I guess it depends what kind of customers these companies are going for.

You read my original take on this and I'm in no way in favour of what Synology has done, which is why I spent a significant amount of time talking to them at the show, trying to understand what's going on and why they did what they did. I'm not trying to defend them in any way, but I also wanted to share their point of view, be it right or wrong. As you say, this might make sense for some users, but it affects others that aren't ok with it and my opinion is that they went too far down their product SKUs with this.
 
Back
Top