there might be a class-action lawsuit against Nvidia over this particular design at some point.
I'm not certain NVIDIA would be the proper defendant here. Does NVIDIA, a California based company, actually manufacture anything? I don't think so.
As far as I know, they do the R&D on the chips but pretty much outsource
everything else, including the manufacturing and design of the cards their chips will be mounted on.
In fact, they have a name for those companies, AIBs (add-in board partners). It is these AIBs who take the GPUs from NVIDIA (which were actually made by TSMC in Taiwan), mount them to their boards, add their own video memory,
power delivery, cooling solutions, etc. (
source).
That explains why boards made by ASUS, Gigabyte, MSI, etc. that use the exact same GPU, have a different component layout and perform differently too.
If NVIDIA is supplying ASUS and Gigabyte the GPUs only (through TSMC's fab labs), and simply giving those AIBs the specs (including the power requirements) and it is the AIBs who are deciding what connectors to use, then I would think it is the card makers who should be sued, "IF" a suit is even warranted.
As ShrimpBrime noted, a 96.7% success rate is pretty good, and on par with other similar products so again, not sure a lawsuit is warranted. Now if the card makers refused to honor warranties, or if resulting heat issues resulted in house fires (or worse) and the companies refuse to do anything about it, deny the problem, or worse, try to cover the problem up, then that is a different story.
@ShrimpBrime - It would be interesting if you refine your AI search to break the results down by brand.