I agree, but not for the reasons you posed.
If I was using AMFM or whatever it would not show Global Experience in AMD software
Not necessarily.
It is always the same people that don't understand.
I believe it's more accurate to say that it's always the same people willing to engage in discussion
You see I bought Spiderman 2 after it showed 27 FPS in the TPU review and it was on sale.
A sale is always nice, I guess! Happy gaming.
What none of you can seem to understand is having an all AMD build that is faster than the PS5
While true, this is not because of the system being all-AMD, but rather, because the PS5 hardware is rather anemic and out of date. The same can be said for Intel+AMD, Intel+Nvidia and AMD+Nvidia builds. Perhaps, even the odd Arc A770 and B580 builds, GPUs which are in far less machines than I'd hoped for.
will mean that you will get great performance when they are ported over to PC.
Not true. There is no evidence whatsoever to support this claim, and plenty of evidence on the contrary.
Are you enjoying Gamepass? You can thank AMD for that too as the same Games are on the Xbox.
Xbox Game Pass is simply a low cost way to rent games. AMD has no involvement with it. I've cancelled my subscription years ago, as I stopped using my Xbox One S and I can just buy the odd game I'm interested on through Steam.
That fact alone is enough to allow for someone that owns AMD to spend more time enjoying their product than belly aching about Nvidia.
Yet... here you are.
I do agree on the market share argument but it is not because AMD is bad at Gaming.
Loaded statement. They aren't bad per se, but they are in no position to claim a spot as a premium graphics vendor. The low market share is a reversible situation, as long as they stay the course and continue to improve their products. Even now with RDNA 4, they aren't exactly matched up with the competition. It's no longer the horrible mess it used to be, though, and over the generations they have made quite a bit of progress. Which I expect to speed up now that the foundational work (drivers, hardware that has the appropriate features such as tensor cores and a competent video coding engine) has been laid.
The glaring issue though is that DGPU is no longer the most viable way to get into Gaming.
It is the only viable way to have a solid gaming experience on a desktop PC, and the only way to have any form of high-end experiences on a laptop computer.
I am willing to bet that there are more Steam Decks sold than any DGPU or laptop that is more expensive.
Not the case, due to regional availability concerns. It is true that iGPUs are ubiquitous in this space. However, even with AMD's great advances in the mobile space and their excellent mobile SoCs, the lion's share of mobile processors (and consequently, iGPUs) still belong to Intel.
That is why I love Gaming on my 800+ library Game PC and the only Game that makes my PC not sing is City Skylines 2 but you need high population and city to see that.
It is the least to be expected of a 7900 XT. I've also amassed a great library of games over the 16 years I've been gaming on PC, and I believe there is not one of them that wouldn't run on your machine. However, it is equally true that there are games where faster hardware would be of benefit, if the eye candy and/or resolution are turned all the way up.
The best though is I gifted my Nephew my previous build and he loves it. That is all AMD too.
I regularly give away my old gear to my brother for him to come up with builds for himself. His main PC still runs the Ryzen 9 3900XT I owned back in 2020, before I upgraded to the 5950X. He was satisfied and did not want the 5950X once I retired it, so I sold it and bought the i9-13900KS I currently own, as the 7950X3D was relatively delayed and I didn't want an 8-core processor. Turns out that was the right call to make at the time, since the Core Ultra is not a good processor and the 16-core X3Ds have that split topology issue, so the wait continues for a 12-core+ 3D CCD chip.
I can't speak to why the 7900XT shows 27 fps in that review but I know I get way more than that if you choose to not believe that what can I do? So just stop attacking me as if I just pulled the numbers out of a hat.
Nobody is attacking you, however you are doing precisely that. There's no way to validate your claims because they don't line up with the experiences that are reported by both users and reviewers, not to mention the theoreticals don't add up. If a RTX 5090 which is showing 3 times the performance of your GPU is falling far short of that claim, the evidence is overwhelmingly against you.
This reminds me of the Starfield flame up or even Avatar. While people were complaining online about no DLSS AMD users were busy enjoying the Game and wondering what all the fuss was about.
A mod to implement DLSS 3 with frame generation was released for Starfield before Bethesda released the patch adding a native implementation. It worked well. But this was largely niche amongst the player base, whoever could run DLSS frame generation in Ada's earlier days would just download that mod and that was it. Noteworthy that this precludes the release of FSR 3's frame generation feature.
...just don't underestimate the audience, it's a critical mistake.
