Hi, depending on your bugg,et I would recommend the corsair 1600 watt power supply
Huh? How about power requirements? If the OP only needs a quality 550W supply, buying a massively oversized unit will kill the budget.
We know nothing of the OP's hardware. For all we know he could be using an R3 with integrated graphics. So yeah,
@jaggerwild has a point.
Yeah durability is what my primary concern and power output quality would be the 2nd concern
Sorry but your priorities are all wrong.
EVERYTHING inside your computer case depends on good, clean, stable power for stable operation, reliability and longevity of all your components and the computer in totality. Therefore, your top priority for your PSU should be the quality of its output power.
Quality output means great regulation and tight voltage tolerances across the full range of expected loads, great ripple suppression, good hold-up times, great excessive voltage and current protection, including inrush current and more. All that comes from a quality design, quality components, and quality construction.
Note if my computer has a maximum demand of 450W, it is MUCH MORE likely a poor quality 850W will fail prematurely (perhaps catastrophically, with a lot of collateral damage) than a top quality 550W PSU.
Shrek is right,
Is durability your only criterion? How about
- Power output
- Cost
- Efficiency
- Noise
Note that efficiency and noise are not true signs of quality. That is, you can have a relatively low efficiency supply with noisy fans that still provides "clean" and stable output voltages. But high efficiency and low noise typically do go hand in hand with quality. And note while the 80 PLUS certification is important, it really is only about efficiency and not quality.
Note also, there is a point of diminishing returns. I generally recommend getting, as a minimum, and 80 PLUS "Bronze" certified, and preferably "Gold". I do NOT recommend spending the extra money on Platinum, Titanium (and now Ruby in EU countries) unless you just happen to come across a too-good-to-pass up discount price.
Why not Titanium? Again, the higher certification rating does not imply cleaner outputs. So the only advantage is slightly higher (only ~4%) efficiency ratings. But if one really does the math, and truly understands the daily power requirements, it takes YEARS of use in energy cost savings to make up the difference in supply purchasing costs. YEARS! And before anyone balks, note the vast majority of computers are NOT up and running anywhere near 24 hours per day, let alone 24/7/365. And when they are up and running, most run closer to idle power demands than to the PSU's maximum capacity most of their up time. Research your local price per kilowatt/hour (average 12.89¢ to 17.45¢ in the US) then do the math.
Outpower wattage capacity also is NOT a sign of quality. That is, nothing says a 1600W supply will output cleaner, more stable power than a 550W supply.
Folks need to remember, the PSU will only deliver what the connected components ask for. PSUs deliver power, they don't push it. If the computer demands 400W, a capable 500W supply will deliver 400W just as an 850W supply or even a 1600W supply will. And there is NOTHING to suggest the bigger supplies will result in the computer having better performance, more stable operation, or better longevity.
@ionic_cloud - While your top priority should be the quality of the output, your first priority is to determine your power requirements. Sure, you can pad the results with a couple extra 100W. That will ensure some extra headroom for possible future upgrades. It
may also result in the PSU's fan slowing down, or even stop spinning for quieter operation.
Durability does NOT imply quality. However, properly sized, quality supplies typically result in a durable supply.