• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Do you still use Antivirus software on your latest hardware?

Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
1,179 (0.59/day)
Location
Turkey
System Name MSI-MEG
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570S ACE MAX
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism + Thermal Grizzly
Memory 32 GB
Video Card(s) MSI Suprim X RTX 3080
Storage 500 GB MSI Spatium nvme + 500 GB WD nvme + 2 TB Seagate HDD + 2 TB Seagate HDD
Display(s) 27" LG 144HZ 2K ULTRAGEAR
Case MSI MPG Velox Airflow 100P
Audio Device(s) Philips
Power Supply Seasonic 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse HP OMEN REACTOR
Keyboard Corsair K68
Software Windows10 LTSC 64 bit
It seems to me the old hot debates about which antivirus is good are long gone. Smartphones, IOTs and other network capable devices are all swirling in. Although the raw computing power greatly surpasses any technological devices we have today, the PCs are being dragged away being part of our lives.
So my question is do you still use Antivirus or firewall or etc on your PCs as of 2025? and more importantly do you think it is a relevant question?
 
Apple for a phone, Defender on my PC..

No smut sites, no torrent, Mr. good boy and no problems.
 
For most Windows users the stock Defender is absolutely good enough. For corporate security it’s another thing entirely, but that’s not what you are asking for, I presume. And running a properly setup firewall on ones router is also generally a good idea.
 
Not really.
Defender and every now and then I run a scan with Malwarebytes and thats about it.
On my Android phone I use even less just whatever is built in and I've never had any issue with that.

I wont lie I do some torrenting here and there mainly for series and movies but I'm very picky about the sites I'm using and so far its been fine.
 
I'm delighted to see everybody thinks the same as me:)

For most Windows users the stock Defender is absolutely good enough. For corporate security it’s another thing entirely, but that’s not what you are asking for, I presume. And running a properly setup firewall on ones router is also generally a good idea.
I even disable it to gain even the minimal power
 
No, I don't. And I haven't for the last 17+ years, but I've always tweaked my OS for the added security, and use my brain when downloading stuff and running downloaded executables. Seriously infected my PC once in the mentioned period, and it was a Win XP system, one nice guy from the Bleeping Computers forum helped me clean it. BTW, MS Defender - yuck, and firewall isn't an AV, it's just a firewall...
 
I think it madness not to have some anti-virus running on a PC, in my case Defender.
 
I think it madness not to have some anti-virus running on a PC, in my case Defender.
I remember getting viruses and trojans installing XP with an active internet connection lol.. that was 20 something years ago, I can only imagine what its like now..
 
Nope - never touched windows defender. It may update when using online updates. I'm kinda sure it does not update itself when i used several times the windows 11 pro offline update package.
99% is gog.com / epic games store / software and updates from computerbase.de/downloads

Using antivirus is the wrong approach in the first place. To fix something which is badly designed is definitely wrong.
 
So my question is do you still use Antivirus or firewall or etc on your PCs as of 2025? and more importantly do you think it is a relevant question?
Of course I still have full security on all my computers - Defender and Windows firewall with occasional double checks with Malwarebytes.

Relevant question? Sorry, but I think it is a silly question. Did the bad guys go away? Are new vulnerabilities (including zero-day) being discovered all the time? Is malware still a threat today?

Do seat belts save lives? With newer cars having all those anti-collision features, and multiple airbags all around, are seat belts still needed? If the law didn't require it, would you use seat belts? Are all those silly questions? Yes.

Are you smarter than the bad guys? Especially the highly educated, vastly experienced, heavily resourced, organized bad guys often "state sponsored"?

Is the user still the weakest link in security? Absolutely! Even the most secure computer, house, bank, organization, etc. is easily compromised if the user opens the door and invites the bad guy in.

So are you totally infallible? It is absolutely impossible for you to ever be tricked, even once, by highly sophisticated, socially engineered malware? Is it impossible for you to accidently click on something you shouldn't have? If so, you must walk on water.

No, I don't. And I haven't for the last 17+ years, but I've always tweaked my OS for the added security, and use my brain when downloading stuff and running downloaded executables. Seriously infected my PC once in the mentioned period
And yet you were still infected! And even seem proud of the fact you were only infected once. :kookoo: How many other computers did your computer infect, or innocent people did you jeopardize by allowing your computer to get infected? Don't say none because there's no way you could have a clue. Even if you physically took your computer off-line the instant you suspected the infection, it was too late. That piece of malware could have been on your computer for weeks or months, wrecking havoc on others before affecting your computer.

Yes, absolutely being a smart, careful user and paying attention - especially with unsolicited items is critical, goes a long way to keeping our systems clean, and may have saved your systems from many more infections.

But malware typically is intentionally designed to be invisible, difficult to be detected - especially once saved to disk. And sadly, by you not using security software, the data being downloaded to your system is not being scanned for malicious code or activity before being saved, or before "running" in the computer's operating environment.

Therefore, you are, and will remain ignorant of what is on your systems. That's meant more as an observation than a personal criticism. However, that ignorance of not knowing makes your computer (and thus you) a potential threat to others, and that is a criticism.

Back to seat belts, that reminds me of those who claim to be such good drivers, they don't need to wear seat belts. :kookoo::rolleyes: :kookoo:- or need insurance. :mad:

I've owned this house for nearly 40 years now. I've never had my house burn down, broken into, or blown away by a tornado (and I live in Tornado Alley). So I guess I don't need home owners insurance, huh?

I too have had just 1 infection. And I am not proud of that because I could have prevented it.

None of my own "personal" computers (and my first was a Gateway I bought directly from the factory in the late 1980s) have been infected because I use security software, I keep Windows and my security current and I avoid being "click-happy" on unsolicited links - plus I am the only one who has access to my personal computers - an important point.

It was on one of my work computers. And that was back in the early 1990s and it was through the "sneakernet" when a co-worker brought in an infected floppy disk from his home. Unbeknownst to me, he put it in my computer to quickly print out a file, then he forgot about it. The next day, when I booted my computer, not realizing there was a floppy disk in the drive, it booted to the floppy first and infected my work computer. I was not happy.

Lesson learned? ALWAYS change the BIOS Setup menu to NEVER boot to floppy without prompting me first. Then make sure no unwanted bootable devices are left inserted (or attached) at the end of every computing session and before booting up next time.

BTW, MS Defender - yuck,
And how would you know Defender is "yuck" if you haven't used any security for 17 years? :(

The "TRUTH" is 100s of millions of Windows users are using Defender and guess what? They haven't been infected. Over and over again the past several years, Defender has achieved top scores from multiple testing labs. "Yuck"? Yeah right.
and firewall isn't an AV, it's just a firewall...
Huh? My F150 isn't an AV either. Its just a pickup truck. Nobody claimed a firewall (or trucks) are AVs.

That said, computer (and router) firewalls are vital security tools to establish a barrier (firewall) between a trusted network or device and an untrusted network (the internet). Again, nobody claimed it was an AV.

I think it madness not to have some anti-virus running on a PC, in my case Defender.
Malware is like "life". And what is the primary, "primal" goal of all life? To reproduce! So what does malware do beside infect the host computer? It seeks out new computers to infect, first on the LAN then out on the Internet. For this reason, it is naïve, at best, to assume not keeping our computers properly secured with a capable anti-malware solution only affects the individual user.

So I can think of much more appropriate descriptions than "madness".
 
I agree and cannot believe that people are turning off anti-virus in this day and age.
 
Not using antivirus on Windows means it defaults to Windows Defender and it suuuuucks. It's just so damn slow and has so many stupid false positives these days. It's crazy how Microsoft, company that partners with so many other software studios and has telemetry jacked into everything has such horrendous false positives. I guess letting Ai do all the work and firing actual engineers makes everything go to shit.
 
I think your system is unstable lol. All quiet over here.
 
Firewall yes. I do not use an antivirus at the moment though, including defender. Haven't had an infection in decades either. Of course I stay updated with patches too.

so many stupid false positives these days.
That's why I dumped it years ago actually. It was flagging my personal dev work and trying to delete the compiles lol.

I agree and cannot believe that people are turning off anti-virus in this day and age.
I wouldn't advise it for 99.999% of the population. But I literally am a security researcher so... I don't worry much about missing an infection.
 
Sophos on my blower and Malwarebytes on my PC. I'm not a pirate these days but still a bit of a perv.
 
Haven't used a third party AV since WinXP days. Win7/10 era I've relied on Defender+Tinywall. Also have used browser script blockers (and later adblockers) for ~25 years, defaulted to disable everything, then whitelisting 'safe' sites.

Managed to make it through the wild west days of P2P file sharing and sketch ass IRC channels in the 90's w/o infection, dumb luck or just manually scanning everything? Who knows.
 
Last edited:
I just use the integrated windows defender.
 
Not using antivirus on Windows means it defaults to Windows Defender and it suuuuucks. It's just so damn slow and has so many stupid false positives these days.

I think your system is unstable lol. All quiet over here.
I agree with freeagent. The problem is clearly your system, not Defender.

I don't recall getting a false positive from Defender in many years. And note blocking a site or file that is not secure is NOT a false positive. A false positive is reporting a site or a download as unsafe or malicious when it is safe.
 
Using a third-party firewall & AV solution myself. Wouldn't say I need one installed, but I don't notice any performance issues even on modest hardware and it doesn't hurt to have it for precautionary purposes, especially when you're getting older or have health conditions (as medication may potentially result in a lapse of judgement). Also probably good to have something at the moment if you play COD (those RCEs, while hilarious, can potentially be used for nefarious purposes).
 
I don't recall getting a false positive from Defender in many years. And note blocking a site or file that is not secure is NOT a false positive. A false positive is reporting a site or a download as unsafe or malicious when it is safe.
I THINK what people mistake for false-positives is when the Defender blocks a program from running when, for example, it’s unsigned. This is fine behavior for most users. For power-users who may use custom tools or run code from Git via Terminal that they KNOW is fine it’s not an issue in any case since you can just tell the Defender to run it anyway. Or add files to the exception list. Defender is probably one of the least intrusive and annoying AVs I had ever used, I don’t get the hate TBH.
 
The only Windows installation I currently have has Defender running.

I have never ran a Windows machine without an antivirus in recent memory. I even had Microsoft Security Essentials on a stripped down machine running only a single software and firewalled thrice (locally on the machine itself and on two routers) from accessing the internet.

Once you figure out the hubris in believing that you are infallible and your computer will never be in a vulnerable position, you start to appreciate those daily scans and gladly pay those extra processor cycles.
 
My main PC I have been running a combo of ESET and Malwarebytes for over 10 years. I get the occasional notification about something being stopped, but aside from that, I don't really know it is running unless the notification pops up.

My laptop is Defender and Malwarebytes. I simply game on my laptop and nothing more really, so if I need to reload windows, it's not a big deal. Pull the latest ISO from Dell and I am up again in about a hour if that.
 
I THINK what people mistake for false-positives is when the Defender blocks a program from running when, for example, it’s unsigned.

Compile your own code with Microsoft Visual Studio and you get a "Waddatack Trojan" Happy Virus Found message. 100% Microsoft Libraries. happened more than once.

I'm not fond of those upload files with my own bandwidth to microsoft message boxes
 
I agree with freeagent. The problem is clearly your system, not Defender.

I don't recall getting a false positive from Defender in many years. And note blocking a site or file that is not secure is NOT a false positive. A false positive is reporting a site or a download as unsafe or malicious when it is safe.
If you mean performance, how is 5800X3D, 64GB RAM and Seagate Firecuda 530 4TB "a problem"? People keep saying this when my system can literally run anything smoothly and really fast and Windows Defender is still slow as dog shit.

If you mean false positives, not if you're a developer. And I'm not even some big time one, mostly scripts and compiled stuff from Autohotkey and stupid Windows Defender keeps being triggered on just random programs of mine for no logical reason. File signature should not be a difference between no detection/detection and false positive.
 
Back
Top