Alcpone's Official 3DMark '06 Compilation

[DOM]

hehehehe good eye

cuz is it good to break in the cpu when you first get it or is it a BS

cuz I cant with till I get mine UPS get here around 5-7pm

 

[nflesher87]

cuz is it good to break in the cpu when you first get it or is it a BS

cuz I cant with till I get mine UPS get here around 5-7pm

it's actually more about "burning in" which has to do with the TIM, and is only necessary for certain TIMs such as arctic silver 5, what TIM are you going to be using?

 

[DOM]

Mx-2

 

[erocker]

MX-2 Works straight away! OC that beast, I want to see some results! I may be in the market for one, not sure yet.

 

[asb2106]

Mx-2

no need to burn in, I just applied mx2 12 days ago, and I monitored temps daily. They moved up and down based on the ambient, but they never lowered due to the TIM setting

 

[DOM]

Yeah been hearing alot wont do over 450 but you know im going to try my best to get more since everythings on water mobo well be max out but not the v-core dont want to kill it

 

[asb2106]

Yeah been hearing alot wont do over 450 but you know im going to try my best to get more since everythings on water mobo well be max out but not the v-core dont want to kill it

i wonder if the quads will suffer from the degredation like the dual 45nm's do??? Whats the multi on that? its 8 right, Id hope you could get more than 450 otta it, otherwise youd prob be better off with a q6600!!

 

[DOM]

i wonder if the quads will suffer from the degredation like the dual 45nm's do??? Whats the multi on that? its 8 right, Id hope you could get more than 450 otta it, otherwise youd prob be better off with a q6600!!

but not all Q6600 OC the same and I heard there higher vids that been coming out so it just luck if you get a good one but some Q do degradation like the dual 45nm's do I think but heres a thread at XS about it Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

 

[asb2106]

but not all Q6600 OC the same and I heard there higher vids that been coming out so it just luck if you get a good one but some Q do degradation like the dual 45nm's do I think but heres a thread at XS about it Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

I guess your right, I have only used 3 different q6600's and they have all done 3.6 easy for me. But in that, one needed 1.62 V to hit it, 1.55 & 1.44. So i understand where your comin from. I do think that youll hit 400FSB on the new quad with much less volts than the 6600 took

 

[DOM]

I guess your right, I have only used 3 different q6600's and they have all done 3.6 easy for me. But in that, one needed 1.62 V to hit it, 1.55 & 1.44. So i understand where your comin from. I do think that youll hit 400FSB on the new quad with much less volts than the 6600 took

LOL 400 is just 3.2GHz I hope to get 3.6GHz at least for 24/7 and hope to get more to bench well im out for a bit baby needs a bath and shes got a present for me eww it smells

 

[Mussels]

I guess your right, I have only used 3 different q6600's and they have all done 3.6 easy for me. But in that, one needed 1.62 V to hit it, 1.55 & 1.44. So i understand where your comin from. I do think that youll hit 400FSB on the new quad with much less volts than the 6600 took

all 4 that i've OC'd personally only needed 1.40 -> 1.425v fpr 3.6GHz. 1.62v would have made me cry...

 

[g30rg1e]

@paul343

QUOTE "By the way, good catch on the other 9800GTX that was posted at about the same time. I thought his overclock settings were too high... I guess the Texture Fillrate gave it away"


i believe i submitted my original benches around the same time as yours, im curious what issues you saw with them regarding clocks and fill rates, your welcome to the original screen shots if you want to analyse them......there quite genuine

 

[erocker]

@paul343

QUOTE "By the way, good catch on the other 9800GTX that was posted at about the same time. I thought his overclock settings were too high... I guess the Texture Fillrate gave it away"


i believe i submitted my original benches around the same time as yours, im curious what issues you saw with them regarding clocks and fill rates, your welcome to the original screen shots if you want to analyse them......there quite genuine

Indeed they are!

 

[nflesher87]

I believe I've read of the QX9650s suffering similar fates with high voltage, however the kentsfields are the toughest cpus I've seen when it comes to high voltage
also to add, don't rely on VID, my current Q66 G0 has a VID of 1.30V and can bench 3DMark06 at 3.8 on air whereas my first Q66 G0 had a VID of ~1.26V and couldn't bench '06 beyond 3.6 on the same air cooler

 

[DOM]

I believe I've read of the QX9650s suffering similar fates with high voltage, however the kentsfields are the toughest cpus I've seen when it comes to high voltage
also to add, don't rely on VID, my current Q66 G0 has a VID of 1.30V and can bench 3DMark06 at 3.8 on air whereas my first Q66 G0 had a VID of ~1.26V and couldn't bench '06 beyond 3.6 on the same air cooler

Same mobo ?

 

[CrAsHnBuRnXp]

Yeah been hearing alot wont do over 450 but you know im going to try my best to get more since everythings on water mobo well be max out but not the v-core dont want to kill it

I cant get stable at 450.

 

[Snipe343]

what if the res wont go to 1280x1024?

 

[Mussels]

what if the res wont go to 1280x1024?

then you're screwed

You'll need to connect another screen in order to do the test.

 

[erocker]

what if the res wont go to 1280x1024?

Then you are not eligable. Sorry.

 

[Snipe343]

awwww, o well guess i just have to wait, all my monitors are old-ish and only have a res of 1024 by 768

 

[erocker]

You should be able to find an old CRT on craigslist or something that will do 1280x1024 really cheap. I look forward to it man, sorry again.

 

[paul343]

i believe i submitted my original benches around the same time as yours, im curious what issues you saw with them regarding clocks and fill rates, your welcome to the original screen shots if you want to analyse them......there quite genuine

Apologies if I have something wrong, but I saw another 9800GTX that doesn't seem to be on the list... yours is a 9800 correct?? Your (if it was yours and not someone elses) post seemed to get deleted quickly along with a comment of mine complementing whoever on there massive clock and memory timings. By far the highest I had seen. I noticed that the Texture Fillrate was less that 50GTexels (I think) and thought it was low in comparision to what my card gives (this number changes for me on GPUZ when I change clockrates) Sooo, when I combined the above, I reasoned that the images were not what they might be.

Anyway, if those were your clocks, NICE! and sorry if this all came out wrong. If its not you then back to the orignal comment I guess...

Paul

 

[nflesher87]

Add Me Please

sapphire 3850 256mb stock cooling
also you may remove my score ranked #47 on this card when I used the E2200

 

[nflesher87]

also another note, I think it would be nice to have an arrow indicating the top score for each gpu
like this:

1, giorgos th. - ATi HD3870X2 @ 878/1098 - 24842 - QX9650 @ 5429.5Mhz - 417.7FSB <--Top 3870X2 score
2, CY:G - ATi HD3870X2 @ 900/1098- 19444 - E8400@ 4320.2Mhz - 480FSB
3, fitseries3 - ATi HD3870X2 @ 825/901 - 19064 - Q6600 @ 3789.5Mhz - 421.1FSB
4, whilhelm - ATi HD3870X2 @ 825/901 - 16195 - Q6600 @ 3005Mhz - 334FSB
5, mandelore - Watercooled 1GB HD2900XT @ 955/1179- 15549 - QX9650 @ 4515.4Mhz - 430FSB <-- Top 2900XT score
6, giorgos th. - ATi HD2900XT @ 887/981 - 15380 - QX9650 @ 5507Mhz - 452FSB
7, TheHaunted - ATi HD3870 @ 1066/1323 - 15116 - Q6600 @ 3711.8Mhz - 412.4FSB <-- Top 3870 score
8, yogurt_21 - ATi HD2900XT @ 941/981 - 14852 - Q6700 @ 3950.1Mhz - 395FSB
9, trt740 - ATi HD2900XT @ 877/1197 - 14452 - Q6600 @ 4041.1Mhz - 449FSB
10, asb2106 - GeCube HD3870 @ 891/1422 - 14113 - Q6600 @ 3779.9Mhz - 420FSB

and so on, but in nice colors and what not

 

[TheGoat Eater]

Add me please

SCORE - 19289

Palit "vanilla" 9600GTs in SLI @ 750/1875/950
CPU: E8400 @ 4.5GHz FSB 500
RAM - DDR3-1800

Cheers