• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Has 14 nm Test Circuits In The Lab, Limited Teaser Info Released

They're dead in the water. :ohwell:
Then it's time to bend over and say Awwwwwwww... As Intel is going to screw you in the arse on their insane prices :shadedshu
And as for your comment about dead in the water! How the hell do you know what amd's plans are going to be? Are you an actual reporter? Oh I forgot you get your info on the interweb my bad. :shadedshu
 
AMD's going nowhere by the time intel have brought out their 2016 broadwell and prior haswell chip the whole computing world may have changed with gpu compute power being used natively and aggressively by the os and all software which would make a 2016 amd APU perform on par with intels finest in computational terms and amd are well ahead of intel in that area plus x86 might itself be the old horse by then.

with arms 2016 offerings being more to pc users tastes all in all no one horse race on the horizon plus nv will be making cpu's by 2016 and everyone can use gate last technologies not just intel tri gate ,and what. you think other devs have stood still, that insults the many other chip cos dev department teams im sure they will at least try and compete though it might not even be relevant by 2016 times change and fast.
 
i just blew my 45 up tut

cant bring myself to change my sys specs though, this pc too poo
 
This is why ARM wont be competing with intel anytime soon, i mean, imagine what they would do if they actually had competition...
 
Wow they are "PLAYing" with 14Nm in a laboratory-environment... have the path to actually go and produce 14nm products!

OMG I'd expect so... this is constituting News'. :wtf:

This doesn't indicate they've anything that comprises something more than a rudimentary I/O circuit, and then probably nothing more than a proof of concept employing 3D metal gates at that level. Everyone is speculating that by 2014-2015 they'll have working chips… Ah, I’d hope so! Moore's Law@2years or David House "18 months" it's due to repeat we know that!

But, like others say will/should that really be the right direction in 2-3 years? Well that’s the direction Intel wants you to believe and follow. Kind Orwellian-1984 to me, they know what you want? This feels so lock-step with x86… :respect:

Is APU/GPU computing, ARM etc... the revolution?
 
Last edited:
Amd need a ufo packed with nice shiz to crash into their main office.
At which point AMD will take the fluffy dice from the UFO's rear-vision mirror and reverse engineer them for 32nm...

...Next they'll sell the rest of the UFO for scrap *cough*Xilleon and mobile*cough* to fund another $250k relocation allowance for Rory Read in order to move to Roswell to oversee the fluffy dice product ramp :eek:
 
Sniff, sniff do you smell that? Smells like Intel is cooking up a monopoly.:banghead:
 
you guys who are worried about an intel monopoly are literally arguing against yourselves.

intel pretty much has a monopoly. they control the entire industry YET they continue to push out insane chips with even greater degrees of innovation at reasonable prices.
 
Intel has continually innovated and offered competatively and fairly priced products for the better half of the last decade, and people still treat them like nothing but a terrible anti-competative monopoly. Intel continues to push out new and innovative products, and all people do is bitch. They have had a monopoly since the 90's, and when AMD had a few years to catch up when Netburst was flopping, they did very little to capitalize.
 
Don't get me wrong I'm not complaining I like Intel. I don't even think their prices are high, I just don't like to see the law broken monopoly aren't allowed where I live.
 
Don't get me wrong I'm not complaining I like Intel. I don't even think their prices are high, I just don't like to see the law broken monopoly aren't allowed where I live.

monopolies are not allowed in the U.S. either. it all comes down to HOW a company achieves their business success. do they do it with back alley deals with other companies forcing out smaller competitors and working with corrupt politicians to have laws passed in their favor or do they do it by consistently making the best products. while intel's history is not white as snow, i think we can all vouch for their incredible innovations.
 
Last edited:
monopolies are not allowed in the U.S. either. it all comes down to HOW a company achieves their business success. do they do it with back alley deals with other companies forcing out smaller competitors and working with corrupt politicians to have laws passed in their favor or do they do it by consistently making the best products. while intel's history is not white as snow, i think we can all vouch for their incredible innovations.

Totally, they're kings for good reasons. And the prices are still pretty nice when looking at what performance you get.
 
Back
Top