• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Intel Outs Extreme Board DX79TO, Sandy Bridge-E Platform On The Cheap

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,775 (7.41/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel's Desktop Board division didn't miss out on the Sandy Bridge-E LGA2011 platform launch, after all, it's ceremonial for Intel to launch a new generation of processors with its own branded motherboards that are fully compatible with them. While Intel had two models of LGA2011 motherboards in the pipeline, the DX79SI and DX79TO, only the former was launched in November, which made it to most platform reviewers. The DX79SI was launched at a price point of US $289 - $299 MSRP, though some retailers easily set that price above $300. The new DX79TO is designed to be a down-scaled version of the DX79SI, targeting a price range of $203 - $208, according to ARK. Naturally then, the price that's 30% lower than that of the DX79SI invites some aggressive feature-cutting.

To begin with, the DX79TO could have a slightly slimmer CPU VRM. Thankfully, it doesn't cheap out much on VRM heatsinks, with the same exact ones found on the DX79SI. The heatsink cooling the VRM area south of the socket is not linked to the PCH heatsink with a heat-pipe, like on the DX79SI. The PCH heatsink itself looks slightly slimmer, though it's not a major area of concern. The CPU socket is still wired to as many as eight DDR3 DIMM slots, supporting up to 64 GB of quad-channel DDR3 memory.



Let the cost cutting begin. First, the expansion slot area does away with the third PCI-Express 3.0 x16 (x8) slot, it is reduced to a PCIe x1. The board is left with two PCI-Express 3.0 x16 slots wired to the CPU, one legacy PCI, and three PCIe x1. Next up, the 8-channel HD audio cluster is replaced by a 6-channel one (pray why? even $50 motherboards have 8-channel audio these days!). Optical SPDIF output is gone. The board has just one GbE connection, the DX79SI has two. Thankfully this connection is still driven by an Intel-made controller. There is just one USB 3.0 controller, which handles the two USB 3.0 ports on the rear panel. The front-panel USB 3.0 controller and its headers are blanked, so two USB 3.0 ports are all you get with this board. In all, Intel did some very aggressive cost cutting, which makes the DX79TO a board for those who'll run Sandy Bridge-E at bare-minimum stock settings. It is DX58OG, encore.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Seeing that $200 is considered "cheap" for a motherboard made me cry a little bit inside.
 
Seeing that $200 is considered "cheap" for a motherboard made me cry a little bit inside.

$200 is cheap for an Intel board.
 
$200 is cheap for an Intel board.

Rather, $200 is cheap for a LGA2011 board. In no time this board will fall to $189 or even $179 thanks to the crap feedback it will receive.
 
Rather, $200 is cheap for a LGA2011 board. In no time this board will plummet to $189 thanks to the crap feedback it will receive.

True enough.
 
Inb4 this board is "featured" on every pre-built skt2011 in the known universe.
 
No one will buy it , at least not me.
x79 motheboards is By far NO NO way near of the X58 when it was Released.
i don't see any reason to upgrade to X79 i am very happy with my X58 classified with i7-970 @4.23GHZ. :roll:
Ok when they roll out the 8-core 16-threads CPU now thats a different story...
 
I'm curious as to why they went with 8 RAM slots.
 
Apparently, 8 DIMM slots is cheaper than 2 more channels of audio and an optical jack.
 
Here's a review of the Intel DX79SI and some others.

 
Back
Top