x800professor
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Messages
- 894 (0.14/day)
Processor | E6600 @ 3.5GHz |
---|---|
Motherboard | EVGA 680i |
Cooling | Thermaltake Big Typhoon with high CFM LED fan + 25cm case fan |
Memory | 2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 1066 C5 @ 1130 5-5-5-15 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA 8800 GTS 655/909 |
Storage | 400GB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | 20.1" SCEPTRE X20WC-Gamer |
Case | Thermaltake Armor with 25cm fan |
Audio Device(s) | On board for now |
Power Supply | FSP Group (Fortron Source) FX700-GLN |
Software | Windows XP Professional |
yeah, i have had a few VERY nice crt's and infact NO lcd to date can compair with a highe end crt for pure quility.
i have owned mitsubishi diamontron 17 and 19in monotors, STELLER montotors, far crisper then even this 21.1 gaming lcd, only reasion i use the gaming lcd is that over the years my 19in diamontron, 19in kds, 19in hitchi(great prof monotors) all have taken damnage to the tube, stupid people trying to clean them with the wrong stuff(scrubby pads insted of just a damp cloths mostly)
there are 3 important things people dont tend to realise about crt vs lcd.
1. dot pitch: this is VERY important for clairty, the closer the dots are to eachother the clearer the image is, lcd's even extreamly expencive ones are higher dotpitch then a good crt, infact this ones got .25 dotpitch and my crt has .24 and i can tell the diffrance, mainly beacuse the dots on lcds are SQUARE so u can see each one of you are wihtin 2 feet of your monotor.
2. refresh rate: now this does effect lcd's but in a diffrent way then crt's, if you are using a digital dvi connection you need to FORCE higher then "stock" refresh on you lcd, my 21.1in uses 60hz at 1600x1200 over VGA, but that setting carrys over to digital for some reasion, when i force 120hz it (almost) totaly removes taring in windows and games, refresh rate is the speed at witch the image is refreshed onto the screen, with a crt you want att least 75hz at 1600x1200, 85+ is perfect.
a crt unlike an lcd wont show taring even at lower refreshrates on desktop or in game as long as vsync is enabled, this is another advantege of good crt's.
3. maturity, crts are FAR more mature as a display tech, no dead pixels are possable, they tend to last 10+years if they arent abused
hell i have 15in crt's that are from the early 90's and even 2 OLD ASS 12in crts that are from some of the first pc's ever made, they still work 100% perfect.
lcds are the new kid on the block thats why you see dead pixels,poor dotpitches, and other little issues.
oh b4 anybody brings on contrast ratio, crts (decent to good quility ones) have ajustiable contrast my old diamontron 17in puts this lcd to shame, and that units over 7 years old.
The Dissadvantege, side, crts are larger and bulkyer, this is why lcd's have taken off so much in home use, tho in my exp not so much in gfx related fields, i have done contract work for a couple companys what did alot of graphical work, and they dont use even high end lcds for the work, they use high end crt's, when i asked them about it the reasion was some of what i stated above, better dot pitch gives better clarity and fine detail, no refresh issues, and no dead pixels(there where others but those are the ones that stuck with me)
money wasnt the issue but they did mention that for the price of a decent 20in lcd they could get 2 high end crt's that would run at 2048 res with a high refreshrate.
x800prof if you want a cheap way to replace that 17in pos try www.merkortech.com , choose accurat it, they have STUNNING deals on large high quility crt's, recently someobyd i know got a 24in sony widescreen crt for 375bucks FREE SHIPING!!!!!
last one i ordered was a 21in ibm crt with DVI-D(digital dvi) connection for a client, shes quite happy with it and it was all of 175bucks free shiping
some of them acctualy have almost the same depth as my 17in , the 21in ibm is between the size of my 17in and 19in in depth, and was STUNNING for clarity, quite shocking how nice it was, if i had the $ i would have ordered 2 more of them for me
Don't forget power consumption. That's another drawback of CRTs. This one slurps down 155W. Everyone who has ever used this monitor loves it. Check this out http://www.pcworld.com/zoom?id=101777&page=2&type=top100chart&zoomIdx=1
They have one on accurateIT, but its $229. I got this one on Ebay with a 2 year warranty for something like $120. It's in perfect condition. The biggest drawback is the pure size of this thing. I won't have to worry about native resolution on this, and that is great. I know that X1950XT won't be able to do 2048x1536 in too many games, but it doesn't matter.
By the way, most of the dead pixels today are usually caused by a speck of dust. It's not necessarily that its a "young" technology, it's just that it is rather costly to build them in a totally dust free room or toss out every panel with a single dead pixel. Now 5-6 years ago, most of the dead pixels were the result of manufacturing errors, but today it's mostly dust. That's why you usually don't see clusters of dead pixels very much anymore. You'll usually just see one or two. HOWEVER, a single dead pixel would drive me insane. It's one of the big reasons I don't have an LCD on anything but my old Toshiba P25-S607 laptop. Not a single dead pixel on that, hurray!