• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

NVIDIA to Launch GeForce GTX 980 Ti After Summer

An immediate ban because you hint that guy is gay.... That's awful rude.

Don't you, guys, have parents who taught you how to behave and not being rude with people?

Its the internet bro......
 
i been away that long i didnt even know rcoon was a mod... feels odd him being authoritative lol


ive decided im not waiting on any release and buying soon as my rebates through! just depends on how much and when....
 
well, wish you luck man.
 
Demand for Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan X is unexpectedly high

KitGuru said:
Even though Nvidia Corp.’s latest high-end graphics card costs more than its predecessors in Europe, demand for the graphics adapter is surprisingly high. According to a German retailer, customers are getting more GeForce GTX Titan X graphics cards than previous-generation products of the same class.

“The demand exceeds the available [hardware],” said a spokesperson of CaseKing.de in an interview with ComputerBase web-site. “We have already [sold] impressive numbers and we are getting new [GeForce GTX Titan X] to the warehouse.”

Mind Factory, another reseller from Germany, confirmed that sales figures of the GeForce GTX Titan X are higher than shipment figures of the original GeForce GTX Titan.

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...dia-geforce-gtx-titan-x-is-unexpectedly-high/
 

This is what I call heavy trolling. Without a single number for a proof, they can write whatever novels they prefer...

This is far more interesting:

DirectX 12 vs. DirectX 11 – Over 100fps Difference on Unreleased GPU

Read more: http://wccftech.com/directx-12-directx-11-100fps-difference-unreleased-gpu/#ixzz3VzRfsgql

Did a test of DirectX 11 vs. DirectX 12 on an unreleased GPU with an 8core CPU. DX11: 13fps, DX12: 120fps. Lighting and lens effects.
 
This is what I call heavy trolling. Without a single number for a proof, they can write whatever novels they prefer...

This is far more interesting:

DirectX 12 vs. DirectX 11 – Over 100fps Difference on Unreleased GPU

Read more: http://wccftech.com/directx-12-directx-11-100fps-difference-unreleased-gpu/#ixzz3VzRfsgql

Did a test of DirectX 11 vs. DirectX 12 on an unreleased GPU with an 8core CPU. DX11: 13fps, DX12: 120fps. Lighting and lens effects.

Shred of proof/evidence*
Also, what would be the reasoning behind the lie?
Just claiming it sells does not make it suddenly sell, why would they make a new Titan if it did not make them money?
Or do you believe that if people think something sells/is popular they are more inclined to buy it themselves (thus making it sell thus rendering Nvidia's claim truthful).

And on that second part all I have to say is: seems legit.
 
Also, what would be the reasoning behind the lie?

Advertisement. ;)

But let's say they do not lie... The absolute numbers will actually say how many people actually bought it.
 
The company could be using the time to let the market digest existing inventories of the GTX 980

Well we won't be digesting any GTX980 right now after this news that is for sure.
 
This card on Summer would be nice option for me. TITAN X is to expensive, GTX980 is to weak for GK110 owners and 1GB only more memory.
Special tragedy would be investment in some expensive 980 models with price close to TITAN X. Better upgrade on X99, I can pay that now, R5E + 5820K + GSkill 2800/3000 and I will sell 3770K platform, and collect rest of money even before GTX980 Ti show up. It would be good some model 10-20% faster than TITAN X. Every percent is important. And that would be 50-60% stronger card with double more video memory with same not lower bandwidth.
Better 50-60 than 10-15% with GTX980. Only 5 months delay can bring me 40-50% more GPU performance and 3GB Video Memory for same money.
Plan is developed for year 2015.
 
This is what I call heavy trolling. Without a single number for a proof, they can write whatever novels they prefer...

This is far more interesting:

DirectX 12 vs. DirectX 11 – Over 100fps Difference on Unreleased GPU

Read more: http://wccftech.com/directx-12-directx-11-100fps-difference-unreleased-gpu/#ixzz3VzRfsgql

Did a test of DirectX 11 vs. DirectX 12 on an unreleased GPU with an 8core CPU. DX11: 13fps, DX12: 120fps. Lighting and lens effects.

New graphics APIs have much less CPU overhead per draw call ... so CPU bound tests with insane number of draw calls per frame suddenly get GPU bound with new API.
You do realize that if CPU and GPU were at 100% utilization on DX11, you can't have 10 times draw calls on DX12 ... you could if the CPU was at 100% and GPU at 10%.
Other than that, it's completely unrelated with ... what was it? ... well, with anything.
 
You do realize

No

you ... you

Yeah, me, me.

Other than that, it's completely unrelated with ... what was it? ... well, with anything.

I am writing about whatever I decide is relevant to the topic in hand. If you have another opinion, it's your problem with miscommunication.

It is about an unreleased GPU, the 980Ti coming after summer is also such.

Other than that, I would wish you something but........ let's be kind.
 
upgrading to the very best part isn't a bright thing IMO... There is no need to buy those & then regret it later. I'm still happy with my rigs coz I chose each part carefully before buying it, rather than looking at ppl's reviews. Remember; your preferences matter more than anything else. I run most games on it's highest settings without problems is the one thing that counts. Aiming too high isn't worth your money if the parts you choose are rated by reviewers who says it's "the best"
 
No



Yeah, me, me.



I am writing about whatever I decide is relevant to the topic in hand. If you have another opinion, it's your problem with miscommunication.

It is about an unreleased GPU, the 980Ti coming after summer is also such.

Other than that, I would wish you something but........ let's be kind.

You not realizing that shows a lack of knowledge on your side.
I cannot find the "you...you" in his comment, if you called him out on grammar that he since rectified I have to say that is hilarious coming from you.

miscommunication is a problem for both parties always.
 
I am writing about whatever I decide is relevant to the topic in hand. If you have another opinion, it's your problem with miscommunication.
You do not have magical power to make irrelevant stuff relevant.
I do have an ordinary power to call irrelevant stuff irrelevant.
Other than that, I would wish you something but........ let's be kind.
Don't feel bad because I pointed out something about something you wrote.
 
You not realizing that shows a lack of knowledge on your side.
I cannot find the "you...you" in his comment, if you called him out on grammar that he since rectified I have to say that is hilarious coming from you.

miscommunication is a problem for both parties always.

Getting called out for English grammar on a tech site that has members from all over the world is silly anyway. Sony Xperia just wants to derail every GM200 thread.
 
Getting called out for English grammar on a tech site that has members from all over the world is silly anyway. Sony Xperia just wants to derail every GM200 thread.

No, I think the moderators should forbid you any personal remarks in my address, and in that case the conversation will flow and there will be peace understanding and happiness. :D
 
No, I think the moderators should forbid you any personal remarks in my address, and in that case the conversation will flow and there will be peace understanding and happiness. :D
why? You only contribute to news posts really anyways.
 
No, I think the moderators should forbid you any personal remarks in my address, and in that case the conversation will flow and there will be peace understanding and happiness. :D
Actually, it's pretty much you that do the bulk of the trolling and start the personal attacks, your ignorance is quite alarming at times, I can only imagine it's deliberate, rarely have I come across anyone attaining quite the fanboi level you currently enjoy, this is the 3rd or 4th time in about a week you have managed to hijack threads, mostly NVidia related which seems odd seeing as you dislike NVidia so much, sometimes you do actually display a degree of knowledge but certainly not recently, I think what's best for all of us is that you take a break from here for a spell and come back in 3 months refreshed.
 
No reason to think on AMD. They are not threat in this moment.
They news last years are mostly rumors and promises. They are not capable to make GTX980 power in 200W or TITAN X power in 250W.
They couldn't do that before year when NVIDIA had technology for that and they will not capable to do that for one year.
NVIDIA chips are more complex and smarter than AMD. Radeon is more raw power, but last years and that is not possible to be competitive to NVIDIA.
We usually wait more than one year to AMD launch similar performance as NVIDIA. Because of that price are so high. And one more thing, AMD can't sell R9-390X over 600$, no matter on power, even 10% weaker than TITAN X. They will need to drop price soon.
From other side NVIDIA will sell GM200 6GB much more than TITAN X. If they launch something really good, with 100-120MHz more than TITAN X and prepare drivers nice without problems on PCB, VRM, display ports, coil whine, black screen, memory allocation, that could be and maybe best card ever made and most wanted chip.
But for nice non reference models manufacturers need and nice prepared terrain and nice reference cards. NVIDIA should start big production of GM200 chips because they can earn lot next 12-18 months on him. But something tell me that we didn't chance to see best Maxwell chip yet. I don't know... Maybe NVIDIA and prepare some real and expensive monster with 1000-1500e price with more than 4000 CUDA. That would be nice end of 28nm.
 
No reason to think on AMD. They are not threat in this moment.
They news last years are mostly rumors and promises. They are not capable to make GTX980 power in 200W or TITAN X power in 250W.
They couldn't do that before year when NVIDIA had technology for that and they will not capable to do that for one year.
NVIDIA chips are more complex and smarter than AMD. Radeon is more raw power, but last years and that is not possible to be competitive to NVIDIA.
We usually wait more than one year to AMD launch similar performance as NVIDIA. Because of that price are so high. And one more thing, AMD can't sell R9-390X over 600$, no matter on power, even 10% weaker than TITAN X. They will need to drop price soon.
From other side NVIDIA will sell GM200 6GB much more than TITAN X. If they launch something really good, with 100-120MHz more than TITAN X and prepare drivers nice without problems on PCB, VRM, display ports, coil whine, black screen, memory allocation, that could be and maybe best card ever made and most wanted chip.
But for nice non reference models manufacturers need and nice prepared terrain and nice reference cards. NVIDIA should start big production of GM200 chips because they can earn lot next 12-18 months on him. But something tell me that we didn't chance to see best Maxwell chip yet. I don't know... Maybe NVIDIA and prepare some real and expensive monster with 1000-1500e price with more than 4000 CUDA. That would be nice end of 28nm.
if AMD proves you wrong will you eat your words? Because you couldn't sound anymore bias towards Nvidia
 
AMD need lot of time to prove that... On GPU PhysX algorithm when work nice, not with CPU I look as something most realistic in gaming after 3D.
Lack of that on AMD for me is same like they are unable to present 25% of color tones... Like some big handicap. Two cards and one of them is normal other is not capable to do 100% same things. NVIDIA could go so far with PhysX that games look completely different, next step would be rendering in real time, every ricoshet or hit to be different and similar things...That would be next good step for gaming except higher resolution. Second thing is that NVIDIA success to somehow achieve with good filters and color tones to everything look more realistic.
I remember before 7-8 and maybe 10 years ATI had better pictures, sharper, NVIDIA looked as 25% lower resolution on same resolution in that time 1024. Now AMD have only sharp picture and color tones are little different, good eye can notice always on video clips in high quality what is inside, NVIDIA or AMD.
Tone of grass, threes... It would be really hard for me to back on AMD... On NVIDIA you can think more on gaming less on game bugs, AMD suffer much worse in buggy games... Than NVIDIA have very good explanation of every game and in game video settings for most games... They explain what will customer get if change some setting, comparison, what is good for image quality and what will improve performance, what customer no reason to enable because no visible change, where is better FXAA, where is better MSAA, in some game work one, in some game other... Comparison between them... Long time on AMD searching for solution for some bug in game I found solution but only for NVIDIA users... If some game is made for Radeon on NVIDIA you will have same or little more fps than Radeon. But if some game is made for NVIDIA you better to avoid immediately with AMD because usually that's disaster. Even if they change on CPU PhysX usually users are faced with fps drops and lose of performance and similar problems. Sometimes Radeons work with 99% on 90C and can't keep stable 60fps, from other side GeForce even only little faster on paper with Vsync work on 60-70% and fps is stable in same game...

But we can't be 100% sure, maybe AMD launch some surprise.
You never know. Now is best time for that if they have something good.
For both sides 5% difference is best scenario.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top