• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Coffee Lake" Architecture by Q2-2018, 7 nm Process By 2022?

btarunr

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,683 (7.42/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Specs
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel's silicon fabrication has evidently hit a huge roadblock. It turns out that not just "Kaby Lake," but its two successors "Cannon Lake" and "Coffee Lake" could also be built on the 14 nm node, at best with a few process-level improvements. "Coffee Lake" is the company's 9th generation Core architecture, which is two steps ahead of even the "Kaby Lake" architecture, which is due later this year. "Kaby Lake" makes its way to the 45W mobile (H-segment) and 15W mobile (U-segment), in Q4-2016 and Q3-2016, respectively. The 15W U-segment will be augmented by "Cannon Lake" (8th generation Core) in Q4-2017. By mid-2018, Intel plans to launch "Coffee Lake" across both H- and U-segments.

According to a "Hot Hardware" report, based on a job listing for a systems engineer at the company, Intel could be staring at the scary prospect of holding out on 14 nm for the next three years, only to be relieved by the stopgap 10 nm node, which makes its debut with the 10th generation Core "Tiger Lake" architecture, due for 2019. "Tiger Lake," its succeeding "Ice Lake," and one other architecture could be launched on 10 nm, before finally deploying 7 nm around 2022.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
I think I'll just wait for Redbull Lake... Should be stronger...
 
Coffee Lake? Coffee with my Intel sounds like a plan. :cool:
 
Think i shall wait for Bovril forest.
 
6 core, 12 threads CPU's coming to laptops! :pimp:
 
HTC said:
But then you won't be able to sleep ...
Click to expand...
...thinking that a CPU you bought in 2020, is only 40% faster than the one you bought in 2011...
 
Last edited:
RejZoR said:
My Hasslewell-E already can't... :p
Click to expand...

Perhaps you spend too much time baywatching ...

Prima.Vera said:
...thinking that a CPU you bought in 2020, is only 40% faster than the one you bought in 2007...
Click to expand...

Just proves what a company can get away with when it faces no "real" competition. Intel is just milking the consumers by providing near zero performance boost over previous generations.

When AMD was "in the game", how much of a performance boost came from one generation to the next, in percentage? Since AMD "left" the scene, how much of a gain has Intel had from one generation to the next?
 
HTC said:
Perhaps you spend too much time baywatching ...



Just proves what a company can get away with when it faces no "real" competition. Intel is just milking the consumers by providing near zero performance boost over previous generations.

When AMD was "in the game", how much of a performance boost came from one generation to the next, in percentage? Since AMD "left" the scene, how much of a gain has Intel had from one generation to the next?
Click to expand...


Have to agree here, my XEON is x58 but kicks the snot out of the 2500k i had aven with that at over 5ghz :/
 
The IPC gain Intel gain from one generation to the next is minimal and the performance boost comes mostly from more cores and other enhancements.

@ least it's allot better the what AMD has. Hopefully, AMD's Zen will force intel to either drop it's prices, up it's performance or, if we're REALLY lucky, both.
 
The chipsets called coffee cake.
 
How many PCI-Espresso lanes will it have? :rolleyes:
 
C'mon AMD now is your chance to play a little catch up!
 
HTC said:
Perhaps you spend too much time baywatching ...



Just proves what a company can get away with when it faces no "real" competition. Intel is just milking the consumers by providing near zero performance boost over previous generations.

When AMD was "in the game", how much of a performance boost came from one generation to the next, in percentage? Since AMD "left" the scene, how much of a gain has Intel had from one generation to the next?
Click to expand...
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/screenshots/original/2011/10/xCPU-Index-November-2011-Games1.png
this old Benchmark tells exactly what you wrote and additionally again what a flop bulldozer is.

the jumps intel made from:
"Q9550" to "i5-760" and then to "i5-2400" are great at compareable pricepoints
or
"QX9770" to "i7-975XE" and the to "i7-2700" again great at compareable pricepoints

and when you look at AMDs journey i get upset because there is a point where they gave up the race:
"Phenom 9950 BE" first jumps to CPUs without L3-Cache "Athlon II X4 640" to "A8-3850" not that bad
or
the clockscaling "Phenom 9950 BE" to "X4 940" to "X4 980" is okay too

but look at the Bulldozer-Cores
now one gets that AMD took a very wrong turn.
In my opinion they should´ve shrunk the Phenom ll and thurban till the "jim keller point in time" who came and designed a "new big many pipelines Core" in a Bobcat-Quadcore-Module-style AMD could´ve leaned with the Cat-Cores and never design stuff like Bulldozer
 
this thread is funny at least..
 
Ok, I'm going to say the same thing everyone else is saying.. Dumbest name.. EVER..
 
Coffee Lake...Love it, Ill drink to that :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top