• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Asetek Receives Award of $600K After Patent Infringement Lawsuit

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,904 (7.37/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Asetek today announced that it has received payment of approximately $600 thousand as awarded in a patent infringement lawsuit against CMI USA, Inc. In December 2014, the U.S. District Court unanimously ruled in favor of Asetek on all claims in a patent infringement lawsuit against CMI USA, Inc. ("CMI") involving Asetek's U.S. Patents 8,240,362 and 8,245,764. The jury awarded Asetek damages representing a 14.5% royalty on CMI's infringing sales since 2012. After an appeal by CMI, the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued an opinion in April 2017 affirming the prior rulings regarding infringement, validity, damages and injunction against CMI. Payment from CMI of approximately $600,000, including interest, was received by Asetek today.

"This award signifies another successful defense of Asetek's intellectual property," said André Sloth Eriksen, Founder and CEO of Asetek. "As part of efforts to build and maintain market share, we closely review and assess all competitive offerings for infringement of our patents. We are pleased with our success in defending them."

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
cooler master
 
glad this is over...
 
I think the funny part is, IIRC, AseTek offered them a 10% royalty rate and they refused it. The courts then decided on 14.5% and the appeals court actually raised that even further to 23.5%.
 
Maybe, they'll use the money to improve their cheap pump design.

Of course not.
 
Maybe, they'll use the money to improve their cheap pump design.

Of course not.

Considering the original name of the product was LCLC or "low cost liquid cooling" I see no reason to. If you want a custom loop build one.
 
Back
Top