Kanan
Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2015
- Messages
- 3,517 (1.11/day)
- Location
- Europe
System Name | eazen corp | Xentronon 7.2 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 in, 1 out) |
Memory | G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 @ 3800, CL16-19-19-39-58-1T, 1.4 V |
Video Card(s) | Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti modded to MATRIX // 2000-2100 MHz Core / 1938 MHz G6 |
Storage | Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM |
Display(s) | Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV |
Case | Corsair Carbide 600C |
Audio Device(s) | HyperX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Logitech Z906 / Sony HD AVR @PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80 |
Power Supply | EVGA 650 GQ |
Mouse | Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // Xbox 360 Wireless Controller |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 LUX RGB /w Cherry MX Brown switches |
VR HMD | Still nope |
Software | Win 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 15 095 Time Spy | P29 079 Firestrike | P35 628 3DM11 | X67 508 3DM Vantage Extreme |
Because at Radeon cards it was malfunctioning and 120 Hz was running fine because it simply is 2x60 Hz, whereas 144 isn't. Also, comparing 144 Hz to reducing a Ferrari from 600 to 400PS is just laughable - please don't use car analogies if you're too stupid to properly use them. It's more like going down 20 PS not, 200. 120 Hz is largely if not 99,9% the same as 144 Hz. I guess you're also tricking yourself into believing your eyes can see the difference, nice placebo. Next time, try to be thankful or at least respectful and not smash down helpful suggestions.