• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Issues Official Statement Regarding RX 560 Silent Downgrade

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.34/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
AMD has come forward with a statement regarding the state of things as it purports to the recent RX 560 downgrade issue, which has been covered extensively by media outlets just this week. The issue stems from the fact that there was no clear differentiator between two different versions of AMD's RX 560 graphics card, which could ship with two different levels of performance: one with 14 CUs (Compute Units) enabled (896 stream processors) or 16 (1024 stream processors, the original specification for the card).

"It's correct that 14 Compute Unit (896 stream processors) and 16 Compute Unit (1024 stream processor) versions of the Radeon RX 560 are available," stated a company representative. "We introduced the 14 CU version this summer to provide AIBs and the market with more RX 500 series options. It's come to our attention that on certain AIB and e-tail websites there's no clear delineation between the two variants. We're taking immediate steps to remedy this: we're working with all AIB and channel partners to make sure the product descriptions and names clarify the CU count, so that gamers and consumers know exactly what they're buying. We apologize for the confusion this may have caused."





While it's true that AMD is now dealing with the situation openly, the company itself isn't completely blameless on the issue. AMD's own RX 560 product page lists the two possible configurations (14 and 16 CU) absent of any further differentiation in product name. At the same time, AMD could have better enforced differentiation opportunities with its AIB partners upon supplying them with both versions of the GPU. As it stands, some users have been unwittingly buying a lower performing part than what was initially advertised by AMD. While this new transparent stance from AMD is refreshing, it doesn't do much regarding already affected customers. Of course, if users suspect or want to check whether or not they have purchased the higher performance version of the card (16 CUs), they can perform a GPU verification with TechPowerUp's GPU-Z tool.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,917 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
100% fail and zero points gained. Nicely done AMD.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
225 (0.04/day)
Location
Finland
Processor 4690K @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-P
Cooling CRYORIG H7
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) HyperX Fury, DDRS 1600MH2
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1070 SC Black Edition
Storage Lots
Display(s) 24" Predator GN246HL, 1080p, 144Hz
Case Phanteks P300
Power Supply Corsair CX650
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 1/0 0.o
oh AMD's so sorry... as who could have known identical names on different products could cause confusion :shadedshu:
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,976 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
AMD did what Nvidia is doing for ages. Let me be clear from the beginning.
THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT DONE SO.


GT 730 nvidia.jpg



Here is a list with articles about Nvidia's misleading branding: Nvidia GT 730 articles
And here is Nvidia's apology: Nvidia explains the three models of GeForce GT 730
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (1.06/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
nVidia doing shit is justified by us knowing Huang goes as low as it gets.
AMD doing shit is not justified by that, clear let down, boo, AMD...
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.86/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
And there is the token "yeah but Nvidia" post.

AMD you were the light, the shining beacon of goodness! Noooooooo!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
422 (0.10/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name masina
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASUS TUF B550M
Cooling Scythe Kabuto 3 + Arctic BioniX P120 fan
Memory 16GB (2x8) DDR4-3200 CL16 Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) Radeon Pro WX 2100 2GB
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500, 640GB WD Black
Display(s) AOC C24G1
Case SilentiumPC AT6V
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Cooler Master MasterKeys L PBT
Software Win 10 Pro
Is it really so hard to call it RX 555? It's not RX 550 and it's not RX 560. Would be a natural course of things...

Technically it is and should be called RX560D... but AIB partners are not giving a single duck about naming schemes.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,384 (1.08/day)
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.93/day)
NVIDIA always didn't do nuffin, but as soon as AIB's (not even AMD themselves) screws users over, whole internet implodes in rage over AMD. So typical in last years...
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.62/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10
AMD did what Nvidia is doing for ages. Let me be clear from the beginning.
THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT DONE SO.


View attachment 94561


Here is a list with articles about Nvidia's misleading branding: Nvidia GT 730 articles
And here is Nvidia's apology: Nvidia explains the three models of GeForce GT 730

Good reality check. In any case, two (or three) wrongs don't make a right. I'm sure the 2nd party folks aren't happy about the confusion either... marketing has to work overtime on this one.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,929 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
NVIDIA always didn't do nuffin, but as soon as AIB's (not even AMD themselves) screws users over, whole internet implodes in rage over AMD. So typical in last years...

Don't try to bring logic to this matter. The anti-AMD squad is on the way most likely and will stomp every bit of common sense.

Let's all ignore the fact that in many, possibly most cases, Nvidia's cards actually get stronger with updated architectures.

Let's ignore the fact that they are doing that simply because it's cheaper to manufacture them on the newer nodes associated with those architectures.

But let's ignore the already ignored ancient practice of having the same name for different products and spin it in such a way to make it look like a good thing. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
2,745 (0.50/day)
Location
MN
System Name Personal / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5900x / i5-4460
Motherboard Asrock x570 Phantom Gaming 4 /ASRock Z87 Extreme4
Cooling Corsair H100i / stock HSF
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 / 8GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA XC3 Ultra RTX 3080Ti / EVGA RTX 3060 XC
Storage 500GB Pro 970, 250 GB SSD, 1TB & 500GB Western Digital / 2x 4TB & 1x 8TB WD Red, 2TB SSD & 4TB SSD
Display(s) Dell - S3220DGF 32" LED Curved QHD FreeSync Monitor / 50" LCD TV
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo / CM HAF XB Evo
Audio Device(s) Logitech G35 headset
Power Supply 850W SeaSonic X Series / 750W SeaSonic X Series
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Black Microsoft Natural Elite Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 / Windows 10 Pro 64
AMD did what Nvidia is doing for ages. Let me be clear from the beginning.
THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT DONE SO.


View attachment 94561


Here is a list with articles about Nvidia's misleading branding: Nvidia GT 730 articles
And here is Nvidia's apology: Nvidia explains the three models of GeForce GT 730

I don't see my particular GT 730 listed on that pic you posted.
Mine has:
1GB DDR3
384 CUDA
64bit bus
12.8GB/s bandwidth
800MHz memory



I'm not caring one way or the other about it's overall performance since I have it in my work computer, but I just thought I'd point it out that she's different over the three listed in your pic.

After all the looking around it looks like the version I have is a mix between a GT 720 and a GT 730 of some sorts....I can't really find any legit posting of this particular model on wikipedia or nvidia.....oh well, it was cheap and did what I needed from it....plus, it's better over the crappy HD 2500 onboard my work computer was using.

Heck, I just went and benched my super powered work computer on 3DMark SkyDiver and compared it to another i3-3220 running just the onboard HD 2500, noticeable difference: https://www.3dmark.com/compare/sd/4914831/sd/2980398#
 
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
1,872 (0.58/day)
Location
Seattle, WA
oh AMD's so sorry... as who could have known identical names on different products could cause confusion :shadedshu:

Yeah this was a shitty thing to do. Alternatively, nVidia differentiated on the two 1060 names and it hasn't seemed to reduce the number of, "What's the difference between 1060s?" threads that pop up on tech forums everywhere.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,133 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,976 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
Let's all ignore the fact that in many, possibly most cases, Nvidia's cards actually get stronger with updated architectures.
GT 730 is supposed to be a 700 series card and one version of that card is using a 400 series GPU(cut down GT 430). Maybe I misunderstood your post. If not, then how is a 400 series GPU, disguised as a 700 series GPU an updated architecture?
And even if we ignore the Fermi version you can't sell under the same name a card with 64bit DDR3 and a card with 64bit GDDR5. The bandwidth difference is huge. In the past that kind of bandwidth difference was enough to justify two DIFFERENT models. GT 640 and GTX 650.

Good reality check. In any case, two (or three) wrongs don't make a right. I'm sure the 2nd party folks aren't happy about the confusion either... marketing has to work overtime on this one.
No it doesn't. As I think I make it clear, it was a bad idea from AMD. By now, they should have known to been much more careful and not think like this

"yeah but Nvidia"





I don't see my particular GT 730 listed on that pic you posted.
Mine has:
1GB DDR3
384 CUDA
64bit bus
12.8GB/s bandwidth
800MHz memory



I'm not caring one way or the other about it's overall performance since I have it in my work computer, but I just thought I'd point it out that she's different over the three listed in your pic.

After all the looking around it looks like the version I have is a mix between a GT 720 and a GT 730 of some sorts....I can't really find any legit posting of this particular model on wikipedia or nvidia.....oh well, it was cheap and did what I needed from it....plus, it's better over the crappy HD 2500 onboard my work computer was using.

Heck, I just went and benched my super powered work computer on 3DMark SkyDiver and compared it to another i3-3220 running just the onboard HD 2500, noticeable difference: https://www.3dmark.com/compare/sd/4914831/sd/2980398#

Your card is the worst of these three models available in 3D performance. Looking at features is probably better than the Fermi model. It's that "LOL BAD" version in the screenshot I posted. It does have a Kepler GPU, it does have 384 CUDA cores, but it also comes with only - in your case - 12.8GB/sec memory bandwidth. It's lower than those 14.4GB/sec on Nvidia's specs page, because when GT 730 came out the specs where talking about DDR3 memory running at 1800MHz.

In typical day usage scenarios - don't know about CUDA, you might not notice any difference, but a model with GDDR5 memory would be killing your card in 3DMark.
 
D

Deleted member 67555

Guest
So lemme get this straight... About the same time there was a slight price hike the product was also being cheapened.....
This is fucking Gross AMD...
Very very gross.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,991 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) AOC Q27G3XMN + Samsung S22F350
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse EVGA X15
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11
Guys it's not like Intel never did this right? Oh wait, third time using 9 gen graphics up until now...
VIA master race.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,651 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Big mistake intended or not. WHoever is responsible needs to be sacked or get a payment cut off. Much unneeded press negativity in a period that AMD tries hard to gain market share. AIBs might have a share of responsibility in this but AMD should prevent this from happening from the get go.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,917 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
AMD did what Nvidia is doing for ages. Let me be clear from the beginning.
THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT DONE SO.


View attachment 94561


Here is a list with articles about Nvidia's misleading branding: Nvidia GT 730 articles
And here is Nvidia's apology: Nvidia explains the three models of GeForce GT 730

But... we're reading an AMD topic here. What's next, a full list of all weird releases of every company ever?

Also - you can see in your little screenshot a full spec list, including shader counts, memory bus etc. and these details are 100% correct. Let's fast forward to Intel's Skylake versus its Kaby Lake parts, now, or give their new i3 quadcore parts the middle finger because they're actually last years' i5 stack.... This is really quite normal. AMD has also been re-releasing Pitcairn until infinity, re-rebranding a whole product stack from HD- to R9, hell I could give you a dozen more examples of any hardware company.

Bottom line, your example makes no sense at all and its not the place.

And this one's for you @RejZoR
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/MSI-GTX-660-670-overvolting-PowerEdition,18013.html


Nobody is clean
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,929 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
954 (0.18/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Atta boy AMD, you really taking moves out of Nvidias playbook.. BAD MOVE!
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
AMD did what Nvidia is doing for ages. Let me be clear from the beginning.
THEY SHOULD HAVE NOT DONE SO.


View attachment 94561


Here is a list with articles about Nvidia's misleading branding: Nvidia GT 730 articles
And here is Nvidia's apology: Nvidia explains the three models of GeForce GT 730

I'm not a huge fan of different variations of a card all being given the same model number, I definitely don't think that should be done. But comparing it to what AMD did with the RX 560 isn't a fair comparison. What AMD did is notably worse.

With the GT730, that was literally a bottom of the barrel card. AND they released all the versions of the card at the same exact time. So everyone knew they existed from day one, and you knew what to look for. If reviewers reviewed the card, they knew to look at the version and let people know which one they were reviewing. (Did any major site ever even review the GT730?) Plus, the target demographic wasn't gaming, if you tried to game on a GT730, I feel bad for you, every version of that card was shit.

But AMD released a model on the market, then later on released another weaker card under the same name. This is very different from what nVidia did, and worse. It also isn't the first time they've released a card, let it be reviewed, then reduced the performance. They've been pulling that shit since at least 2008...
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
1,851 (0.53/day)
Location
Calabash, NC
System Name The Captain (2.0)
Processor Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E AORUS Master
Cooling 280mm Arctic Liquid Freezer II, 4x Be Quiet! 140mm Silent Wings 4 (1x exhaust 3x intake)
Memory 32GB (2x16) G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo (6000Mhz)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 SUPRIM X
Storage 1x Crucial MX500 500GB SSD; 1x Crucial MX500 500GB M.2 SSD; 1x WD Blue HDD, 1x Crucial P5 Plus
Display(s) Aorus CV27F 27" 1080p 165Hz
Case Phanteks Evolv X (Anthracite Gray)
Power Supply Corsair RMx (2021) 1000W 80-Plus Gold
Mouse Varies based on mood/task; is currently Razer Basilisk V3 Pro or Razer Cobra Pro
Keyboard Varies based on mood; currently Razer Blackwidow V4 75% and Hyper X Alloy 65
I'm not a huge fan of different variations of a card all being given the same model number, I definitely don't think that should be done.

But AMD released a model on the market, then later on released another weaker card under the same name. This is very different from what nVidia did, and worse.

GTX 1060. Nuff said.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.71/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
nVidia doing shit is justified by us knowing Huang goes as low as it gets.
AMD doing shit is not justified by that, clear let down, boo, AMD...
GTX 1060. Nuff said.
Christ... how many threads can we spill this into...

The fundamental problem is the fact that amd changed the specs on the website so the same name card has two different specs. 560d was asia... in the us its jusst a 560. The 1060 on nvidias website, clearly shows that the specs are different.

This will look familiar to vya... lol....Incoming car analogy!!!

NVIDIA - You can buy a base Mustang (1060 3gb) and a Mustang GT (1060 6gb)
Your argument - they are both called a Mustang and we cant differentiate easily enough. However if i look it up, clearly we can tell there is a difference..see specs.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/10series/geforce-gtx-1060/

AMD - You can buy a Mustang GT only...however you arent sure what motor is in it, the slower 6 cyl turbo or the 5.0L, and cant tell until you get it home and check. The specs from the factory show both motors for the same car and trim level, no help there.
Argument - Those dealerships are being shady even though the ford factory itself has it listed incredibly ambiguous. Ok.. its not ambiguous, it is clear there are two specs for the same card...no "d"
http://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/radeon-rx-560


While nvidias naming scheme could most certainly be made more clear, it is a different situation as nvidia makes it clear there is a difference starting from their website on down to the card partners.

Edit: and please stop the random nvidia injection into these threads. We get it... :)
 
Last edited:
Top