• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Internal Memo Reveals that even Intel is Impressed by AMD's Progress

Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,204 (1.24/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Counter strike at 10Fps.
That's slideshow territory right there. :laugh:

I remember Cyrix... I mean Shitrix. Damn, I just showed my age. :laugh:
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,986 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) Gigabyte G27Q + AOC 19'
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11 x64
We also have VIA Master Race, they even do GPUs.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,244 (1.36/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Ryzen 5800x
Motherboard Gigabyte x570 Gaming X
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 4x8GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6800 XT (reference)
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 2TB
Display(s) Samsung CFG70, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
Shitrix more like it. I remember the days of my first PC with a Shitrix PR300 and a voodoo banshee. Counter strike at 10Fps.

Heh.. my first PC was a Cyrix 486-50. Seemed straightforward enough though. Things got more complicated after Pentium.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.67/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
The only way that I can figure Intel is that they got complacent being on top for so long. Tech progression stagnated and they were for a long while selling 4 core 8 thread CPUs for what they should have been selling 6 core 12 thread CPUs for. It's the same lesson over and over again. When there is a lack of competition then the company on top charges more for less value and tech stagnates.
This.
Intel rested for far too long on their laurels and the urgency to innovate wasn't strong enough.
Now they're ~real~ interested,.....urgently.

I love it.

Look at the 8700K, it runs as hot as a mofo (partly due to the paste TIM that they use)
8700K, note the temps
240mm AIO cooled

schmeeble frog.JPG
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,204 (1.24/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
What are your temps when doing MPEG4 h.264 encoding/transcoding using Handbrake? Because that’s when I see the higher than like-able temps.

I’m ripping some DVDs (that I have to stress, I own them!) and when compressing down the content from the raw MKV files I see high temps.

Edit: I've done some research and Handbrake's h.264 encoder does indeed use AVX 256-bit instructions.
Intel said:
Accelerating x265 with Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 512 (Intel® AVX-512)
The x264 project for Advanced Video Coding (AVC) encoding and the x265 project for High-Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) encoding are the two widely used media libraries that extensively use multiple generations of SIMD instructions on Intel architecture processors, from MMX technology all the way up to Intel AVX2.
AVX instructions, especially the 256-bit kind, can very much heat a processor up.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,973 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
Yes. It is and can be a good one depending on use cases. It can EASILY blow the monetary savings of the cpu (core vs core and thread vs thread) right out the door. Over buying on cores and threads in a DC environment can be quite detrimental to the bottom line on many fronts.
AMD sells models of server CPUs with 8 cores, not only models with 32-64 cores. And at lower prices compared to Intel. If there is a market where more than 2 or 4 cores are a negative, I am pretty sure they can start selling models with a limited number of cores. So, where is the problem?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
It wouldn't have been so bad years ago. It's remarkable just how few CPU companies/designers are around anymore.
Actually there's quite a lot of them. Just not in the PC business.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,244 (1.36/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Ryzen 5800x
Motherboard Gigabyte x570 Gaming X
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 4x8GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6800 XT (reference)
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 2TB
Display(s) Samsung CFG70, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
Actually there's quite a lot of them. Just not in the PC business.

I had some of those in mind too. Up until the recession or a bit before, it seemed like every UNIX company had their own chips. I don't even know what's around anymore except Power.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I had some of those in mind too. Up until the recession or a bit before, it seemed like every UNIX company had their own chips. I don't even know what's around anymore except Power.
While it's true those went the way of the Dodo, we now have ARM based designs creeping their way into that market.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
21 (0.01/day)
They should check the security pillar. I think it's made of jello.

I liked that...;) Funny...;) Apropos!

Yes. It is and can be a good one depending on use cases. It can EASILY blow the monetary savings of the cpu (core vs core and thread vs thread) right out the door. Over buying on cores and threads in a DC environment can be quite detrimental to the bottom line on many fronts.


*cough* For every piece of software that charges by the core for using it, there are at least four competing pieces of software that charge according to other metrics--like, uh, perceived quality and professional reputation, for instance, or, uh compatibility with varying software standards, or even, in some cases, security. Or some combination thereof! Unless the software is in the "my business cannot survive without this software" category, my sincere recommendation is to eschew these "licensed by the x86 core" applications as if they are spreading plague...;)

Intel are scrambling. Worse position they've been in since Athlon 64, maybe even worse as this time they're helmed by a band-aid choice of a CEO, Bob Swan. A man that has no understanding of the main products Intel develops vs a MIT powerhouse who studied electrical engineering for her PhD.

Bingo! So much of a company's fate is inextricably applied to the man at the top--After the highpoint of A64, @ AMD, the point at which the company should have taken off like a bat out of hell, putting the wrong person at the top of the stack in the CEO position came darn close to killing the company off, instead--which would have been a tragedy--would have set general computing back maybe 50 years. It didn't happen, thankfully---investors largely kept the clock ticking at AMD until the right CEO could be landed, and she had one foot in engineering and one foot in the consumer markets and she understood AMD's situation perfectly! Lisa Su was ideal on so many levels it defies description. The right ma--er, lady, for the job! In spades! Lots of CEO candidates might have identified AMD's problems correctly but few of them would have known how to solve them! But CEO mismanagement is the #1 cause of computer companies expiring--a la Commodore--just one example--Cyrix, and many more. I mean, for years at AMD the company had a CEO so utterly clueless about "What to do?--where to go?" that at one point AMD was actually selling Intel servers under the AMD brand! *talk about face palm* I thought at the time it was finally curtains for AMD as selling servers for Intel had to be the bottom--but Lisa Su came on deck, ready to knock the ball out of the park, little did I know....;) AMD simply doesn't have the money to toss away like Intel has and wastes, but the interesting thing is that Intel's mistakes today are going to begin exacting penalties that have far greater short-term and long term effects on Intel--and it's all because of the fact that AMD is making Intel appear to be the quite second-rate tech company. It's AMD executing on a dime these days--certainly not Intel. ATM Intel has a huge cash warchest to sit on, but the flip side is that a company the size of Intel can burn through money like there's no tomorrow, so sitting pat on past performance to continue to bring in something isn't going to work all that much longer! Either Intel will make the products people want--or it won't--and there's no gray area left. It's a very binary proposition.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,204 (1.24/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
And we come back to the question of why did Intel put a finance guy in the CEO seat?
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,448 (0.31/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E MPG Carbon Wifi
Cooling Custom loop, 2x360mm radiator,Lian Li UNI, EK XRes140,EK Velocity2
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5-6400 @ 6400MHz C32
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra OC Scanner core +750 mem
Storage MP600 2TB,960 EVO 1TB,XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB,Micron 1100 2TB,OCZ Vector 512GB,1.5TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Acer X34S, Acer XB270HU
Case LianLi O11 Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Logitech G-Pro X Wireless
Power Supply EVGA P3 1200W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G512 Carbon w/ GX Brown
VR HMD HP Reverb G2 (V2)
Software Win 11
And we come back to the question of why did Intel put a finance guy in the CEO seat?

Bob Swan hasn't been at the head of the company long enough to be involved in any of the end-point decisions that have put them in the place they're in currently.

We'll need some time with him in the seat to see what comes of his tenure.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Cyrix CPU's were very solid BITD.
Really? I remember them being the weakest of the bunch. Ok with integer processing (but so was everybody else), but weakest when it came to FP.
But it would be nice if Cyrix and VIA were still around. Because now fanboys on either side, only have one brand to hate :D
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.67/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
What are your temps when doing MPEG4 h.264 encoding/transcoding using Handbrake?
AVX instructions, especially the 256-bit kind, can very much heat a processor up.
I don't know because I never use Handbrake. If I do copy a movie, (a rare occurrence) I use DVD Fab to do it with.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
96 (0.05/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard AsRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 4 x 16 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT red 3000C15 @ 3800C16 Micron rev E
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2070 mini
Storage Corsair MP510 1.92TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J592UQU 31.5" UHD + Fujitsu P19-2 19" 1280x1024
Case Jonsbo U3 mATX
Audio Device(s) ATH-M50
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600W SFX [currently RMAed]
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard QPAD MK-50 mechanical
Software Win10Edu_64
"maybe providing amd IP to Intels X86 many years ago wasn't such a smart long term move after all? " - voltage

"I think it's about Intel licensing x86 to AMD" - XiGMAKiD

"I think what he's on about was when things went 64-bit, or something...
AMD cross licensed AMD64 with Intel, so they could go on making x86 compatible CPUs." - TheLostSwede

The first one... English isn't my first language too, but I understood what he meant.
Then I wouldn't mind being enlightened to what you think he meant. We have two different takes on this so far. One seems to think he meant that it was a mistake for AMD to license AMD64 to Intel. One seems to think it was a mistake for Intel to license x86 to AMD. Both of which would be an oversimplification to the point of meaninglessness. Not to mention both interpretations seeing two different failures (one on the AMD side one on the Intel side).
 

dorsetknob

"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
9,105 (1.31/day)
Location
Dorset where else eh? >>> Thats ENGLAND<<<
"maybe providing amd IP to Intels X86 many years ago wasn't such a smart long term move after all? "
In the post 486/586 era of Intel and AMD
Intel needed a IP Cross licensing agreement with AMD as much as AMD also needed this Cross licensing ( and Probably more ).
AMD Brought X64 to the Deal which Intel wanted/Desperately needed.
The Other big Player Cyrix Had no IP that Intel wanted or needed and therefore could not effectivly compete with Intel (Pentium) and AMD (athlon ).
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
96 (0.05/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard AsRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 4 x 16 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT red 3000C15 @ 3800C16 Micron rev E
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2070 mini
Storage Corsair MP510 1.92TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J592UQU 31.5" UHD + Fujitsu P19-2 19" 1280x1024
Case Jonsbo U3 mATX
Audio Device(s) ATH-M50
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600W SFX [currently RMAed]
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard QPAD MK-50 mechanical
Software Win10Edu_64
The Other big Player Cyrix Had no IP that Intel wanted or needed and therefore could not effectivly compete with Intel (Pentium) and AMD (athlon ).
If that is what the OP meant, it is still a very limited view of a very complicated issue that has - in the end - little to do with cross licensing (which both parties and the consumers have gained by) and more to do with the own engineering staff and innovations. For who exactly was the AMD64 licensing deal not the "smart long term move after all" in this case? Intel is still the 60+ billion jaggernaut vs the AMD 6+ billion wallflower. Was AMD supposed to not license AMD64? It was a great implementation but even back then with AMD winning nearly every performance and price contest and charging 1k for binned FX chips, Intel had the vast majority of the market secured. If AMD hadn't let them license it, they would have lacked some crucial instruction sets themselve and Intel might just have gone forward with their own implementation and considering their lock on the market (through PR, money and shady/illegal actions) might have succeeded even more. Intel without at least a competent AMD would also be the target of many anti-trust investigations and potential splitting of the company. Cyrix is also an interesting subject in and of itself, since they just reverse engineered Intel CPUs without actually having an x86 license (very clever but you can't compete by reverse engineering alone for long). Via was/is the only other player with such a license. Cyrix went in another direction, before AMD64 became a thing.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,157 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
In the post 486/586 era of Intel and AMD
Intel needed a IP Cross licensing agreement with AMD as much as AMD also needed this Cross licensing ( and Probably more ).
AMD Brought X64 to the Deal which Intel wanted/Desperately needed.
The Other big Player Cyrix Had no IP that Intel wanted or needed and therefore could not effectivly compete with Intel (Pentium) and AMD (athlon ).
To add to the context, AMD also didn't have much IP Intel wanted. But they bought what they needed from DEC and marketed that technology. It was probably a pretty risky move, but it paid out big time.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.52/day)
Really? I remember them being the weakest of the bunch. Ok with integer processing (but so was everybody else), but weakest when it came to FP.
Na, Cyrix CPU's benchmarked fairly well in games and traded wins with like all the rest. Their downside was that they ran hotter than AMD, Intel and VIA. Even the Winchips ran cooler.
But it would be nice if Cyrix and VIA were still around. Because now fanboys on either side, only have one brand to hate :D
Right? It's not like the market isn't big enough for them now..
 
  • Like
Reactions: bug
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,986 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) Gigabyte G27Q + AOC 19'
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11 x64
The cost of getting on par with the freaking Atoms in performance must be huge.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
47 (0.02/day)
I'm glad the full memo is here, since it disappeared from the original Reddit site.
In my opinion, the real challenge to Intel comes from TSMC, rather than really from AMD itself. Their "7nm" may only be equivalent to Intel's 10nm, but they had it ready first.
It's true that Intel has as many people working on software for Intel chips as AMD has period. So Intel has a good Fortran compiler for Intel chips which is expensive - and AMD has a free Fortran compiler for AMD chips, from the open-source LLVM, which only runs on Linux. So that's an area where Intel is ahead. But that made me think of the rivalry between IBM and Control Data, and the famous "including the janitor" memo.
More is not always better, even if the small size of AMD is limiting it in some ways.

But it would be nice if Cyrix and VIA were still around.

Given that Microsoft Windows needs an x86 to run on, what would be nice is if the x86 architecture didn't require licensing. So that in addition to SPARC, Sun could have made x86; in addition to PowerPC, IBM could have made x86 (actually, they did for a while, licensing it from Cyrix). Any company able to make a CPU ought to be able to make a CPU that can actually be used: one that can run Windows. And if Windows and the applications for it aren't distributed as source, because it isn't free like Linux, then that means the dominance of Windows has enshrined the dominance of x86. CPU makers can't compete on their merits, if they can't make x86 chips.

Of course, while SPARC and PowerPC and MIPS and Alpha and 680x0 never took the world by storm, ARM was able to get somewhere - but by carving out a new niche, in which it is dominant.

So the remedy to competition in the chip industry, barring x86 being taken from Intel, would be the government forcing Microsoft to move Windows to RISC-V and abandon the x86. That, of course, is hardly likely to happen.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,204 (1.24/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Given that Microsoft Windows needs an x86 to run on
That's only because of the need for backward compatibility with decades-old legacy applications. Take the need to support legacy applications out of the equation and suddenly x86 is no longer a requirement, ARM can be used instead. Most modern programs still have source available so yes, they can be compiled for ARM. Will it be painful at first? Yes, but it can be done.
 

narble

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Well, yes and no. They didn't become complacent in that sense, but rather, they believed they were so far ahead, so even though their first 10nm process was a mess, they thought they would have time to fix it, but alas... Hence why they started a second 10nm process, as we know. On top of that, they decided to focus on a million other things, like FPGAs, AI co-processors, GPUs, wireless data modems (3G/4G, but clearly 5G was another mess), IoT (another huge failure), mobile phone SoCs (failure), photonics and what not. This means that they somewhat lost focus on the CPU business, as it was only part of what Intel made. Then they got a huge order for 4G models (and an expected order for 5G modems) from Apple, due to them falling out with Qualcomm and this ate up a lot of their production capacity. In other words, it's not so much being complacent, as having too many different businesses that don't quite fit and which used up a lot of resources. If you take a good look, it's not hard to see why Intel are in their current position. Yes, some of their "new" businesses have helped them make more money, but at the same time, they've lost focus on the good old x86 CPU.

Definitely a strategic miss, but I think you'll find it was nothing more than a poor decision in favor of short-term profitability... Bean-counters overriding engineering decisions.

Take a look at the investment Intel made (and reversed) in ASML a few years ago. Those guys were the only ones delivering EUVL and it looked like Intel had shut out the other foundries by buying up all of ASML's upcoming production. Intel didn't just buy a big stake in ASML, they pre-ordered enough of the upcoming production to shut out Samsung and TSMC. Then what happened? I'm sure Intel insiders could comment on this, but it looks like Intel just decided they'd get along just fine without EUV.

Just look back a couple of years at TSMC's roadmap and the indications that Intel was bypassing extra-dense litho for low-end silicon (indicators here and here). I just keep wondering how Intel thought they were going to be able to continue the ramp-up to greater capacity per die without a clear path beyond DUV. Your 10mm plans are adorable, Intel.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
111 (0.05/day)
Not for long. The 5700XT is about to be released and the later Navi (kraken) is coming as well.

Vega was a product that initially was designed for the compute and not gaming space. However with some tweaks you could apply it as a gaming GPU but with lots of overhead.
I've only just noticed your response. As much as everyone would like AMD to be competitive, it's not something that's going to happen anytime soon. Nvidia still controls the high end of the market.
 
Top